Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

What have we learned from public engagement?

The results of exercises in which members of the public discuss nanotechnology with scientists might not be surprising but, as Richard Jones explains, they are still worthwhile.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (The Royal Society, London, 2004);

  2. Final report of the Nanotechnology Engagement Group, to be published in June 2007;

  3. Beringer, J. et al. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: A Review of Government's Progress on its Policy Commitment (Council for Science and Technology, London, 2007);

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, R. What have we learned from public engagement?. Nature Nanotech 2, 262–263 (2007).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Find nanotechnology articles, nanomaterial data and patents all in one place. Visit Nano by Nature Research