Color from invisible patterns

Abstract

Human pattern resolution is limited by optical blurring1 as well as neural filtering1,2,3 by a cascade of retinal and cortical sites4,5,6 with progressively lower resolution limits. Curiously, pattern structure can influence perceived color: a high-contrast, monochromatic (single wavelength) pattern appears desaturated (closer to white) relative to a uniform field of the same wavelength3,7,8. Here we show that this desaturation is evident even when the pattern's frequency is too high for conscious perception, implicating a nonlinear process—namely light adaptation—at the level of single cone photoreceptors. We propose a neural mechanism in which fast, involuntary eye movements serve to shift control over perception between two competing cone populations, each operating at different levels of adaptation.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: The perceptual phenomenon.
Figure 2: The frequency response.
Figure 3: Perceptual and neural dynamics.

References

  1. 1

    Campbell, F.W. & Green, D.G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 181, 576–593 (1965).

  2. 2

    Sekiguchi, N., Williams, D.R. & Brainard, D.H. Nonlinear distortion of gratings at the foveal resolution limit. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 10, 2118–2133 (1993).

  3. 3

    He, S. & MacLeod, D.I.A. Local luminance nonlinearity and receptor aliasing in the detection of high frequency gratings. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 13, 1139–1151 (1996).

  4. 4

    MacLeod, D.I.A., Williams, D.R. & Makous, W. A visual nonlinearity fed by single cones. Vision Res. 32, 347–363 (1992).

  5. 5

    McMahon, M.J., Lankheet, M.J., Lennie, P. & Williams, D.R. Fine structure of parvocellular receptive fields in the primate fovea revealed by laser interferometry. J. Neurosci. 20, 2043–2053 (2000).

  6. 6

    He, S. & MacLeod, D.I.A. Orientation-selective adaptation and tilt after-effect from invisible patterns. Nature 41, 473–475 (2001).

  7. 7

    Burton, G.J. Evidence for nonlinear response processes in the human visual system from measurements on the thresholds of spatial beat frequencies. Vision Res. 13, 1211–1225 (1973).

  8. 8

    Williams, D.R. Aliasing in human foveal vision. Vision Res. 25, 195–205 (1985).

  9. 9

    He, S. & MacLeod, D.I.A. Contrast-modulation flicker: dynamics and spatial resolution of the light adaptation process. Vision Res. 38, 985–1000 (1998).

  10. 10

    Hayhoe, M., Benimoff, N.I. & Hood, D.C. The time course of multiplicative and subtractive adaptation processes. Vision Res. 27, 1981–1996 (1987).

  11. 11

    Krauskopf, J. Effect of retinal image stabilization on the appearance of heterochromatic targets. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 53, 741–744 (1963).

  12. 12

    Ditchburn, R.W. Eye Movements and Visual Perception (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1973).

  13. 13

    Byford, G.H. A sensitive contact lens photoelectric eye movement recorder. I.R.E. Trans. Med. Electron. 9, 236–243 (1962).

  14. 14

    Ditchburn, R.W. & Ginsborg, B.L. Involuntary eye movements during fixation. J. Physiol. 119, 1–17 (1953).

  15. 15

    Riggs, L.A., Armington, J.C. & Ratliff, F. Motions of the retinal image during fixation. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 44, 315–321 (1954).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grant EY-01711 from the National Institutes of Health. We wish to thank A. Shady, D. Hood, A. Holcombe and D. Beer for their comments on an earlier manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Sherif Shady.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shady, S., MacLeod, D. Color from invisible patterns. Nat Neurosci 5, 729–730 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn894

Download citation

Further reading