Mechanisms of scent-tracking in humans

  • A Corrigendum to this article was published on 01 February 2007

Abstract

Whether mammalian scent-tracking is aided by inter-nostril comparisons is unknown. We assessed this in humans and found that (i) humans can scent-track, (ii) they improve with practice, (iii) the human nostrils sample spatially distinct regions separated by 3.5 cm and, critically, (iv) scent-tracking is aided by inter-nostril comparisons. These findings reveal fundamental mechanisms of scent-tracking and suggest that the poor reputation of human olfaction may reflect, in part, behavioral demands rather than ultimate abilities.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Human subject's path following a scent trail, as compared to a dog's path.
Figure 2: Training increased tracking velocity, decreased deviation from track, and increased sniffing frequency.
Figure 3: The two-nostril advantage in sampling and tracking.

Change history

  • 04 January 2007

    corrected last name

References

  1. 1

    Vickers, N.J. Chem. Senses 31, 155–166 (2006).

  2. 2

    Koehl, M.A. et al. Science 294, 1948–1951 (2001).

  3. 3

    Thesen, A., Steen, J.B. & Doving, K.B. J. Exp. Biol. 180, 247–251 (1993).

  4. 4

    Settles, G.S. J. Fluids Eng. 127, 189–218 (2005).

  5. 5

    Mainland, J. & Sobel, N. Chem. Senses 31, 181–196 (2006).

  6. 6

    Moulton, D.G. Am. Zool. 7, 421–428 (1967).

  7. 7

    Crimaldi, J.P. & Koseff, J.R. Exp. Fluids 31, 90–102 (2001).

  8. 8

    Wilson, D.A. & Sullivan, R.M. Physiol. Behav. 66, 41–44 (1999).

  9. 9

    Gilad, Y., Wiebel, V., Przeworski, M., Lancet, D. & Paabo, S. PLoS Biol. 2, 120–125 (2004).

  10. 10

    Laska, M., Seibt, A. & Weber, A. Chem. Senses 25, 47–53 (2000).

  11. 11

    Shepherd, G.M. PLoS Biol. 2, 572–575 (2004).

  12. 12

    Smith, T.D. & Bhatnagar, K.P. Anat. Rec. B New Anat. 279, 24–31 (2004).

  13. 13

    Rajan, R., Clement, J.P. & Bhalla, U.S. Science 311, 666–670 (2006).

  14. 14

    Porter, J., Anand, T., Johnson, B., Khan, R.M. & Sobel, N. Neuron 47, 581–592 (2005).

  15. 15

    Gibbons, B. Nat. Geogr. Mag. 170, 324–361 (1986).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Studies were funded by Army Research Office grant #46666-LS and by US National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders grants DC006915 and DC005958. The authors wish to thank B. Willmore for help with the video tracking algorithm and K. Scott for comments on the manuscript, as well as Arak Elite.

Author information

Correspondence to Jess Porter or Noam Sobel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

An example dynamic power spectra and tracking path. (PDF 370 kb)

Supplementary Video 1

Sample trial. (MOV 2171 kb)

Supplementary Methods (PDF 90 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Porter, J., Craven, B., Khan, R. et al. Mechanisms of scent-tracking in humans. Nat Neurosci 10, 27–29 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1819

Download citation

Further reading