Article | Published:

Prior experience enhances plasticity in adult visual cortex

Nature Neuroscience volume 9, pages 127132 (2006) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The brain has a remarkable capacity to adapt to alterations in its sensory environment, which is normally much more pronounced in juvenile animals. Here we show that in adult mice, the ability to adapt to changes can be improved profoundly if the mouse has already experienced a similar change in its sensory environment earlier in life. Using the standard model for sensory plasticity in mouse visual cortex—ocular dominance (OD) plasticity—we found that a transient shift in OD, induced by monocular deprivation (MD) earlier in life, renders the adult visual cortex highly susceptible to subsequent MD many weeks later. Irrespective of whether the first MD was experienced during the critical period (around postnatal day 28) or in adulthood, OD shifts induced by a second MD were faster, more persistent and specific to repeated deprivation of the same eye. The capacity for plasticity in the mammalian cortex can therefore be conditioned by past experience.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Instructed learning in the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl. Nature 417, 322–328 (2002).

  2. 2.

    & Long-term retention of single and multistate prismatic adaptation by humans. Nature 272, 364–366 (1978).

  3. 3.

    , & Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting. J. Neurosci. 25, 473–478 (2005).

  4. 4.

    Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 831–843 (2004).

  5. 5.

    Capacity for plasticity in the adult owl auditory system expanded by juvenile experience. Science 279, 1531–1533 (1998).

  6. 6.

    , & Adaptive axonal remodeling in the midbrain auditory space map. J. Neurosci. 21, 3161–3174 (2001).

  7. 7.

    , & Anatomical traces of juvenile learning in the auditory system of adult barn owls. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 93–98 (2005).

  8. 8.

    & Single cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J. Neurophysiol. 26, 1003–1017 (1963).

  9. 9.

    & Visual resolution and experience: acuity deficits in cats following early selective visual deprivation. Science 180, 420–422 (1973).

  10. 10.

    & Ocular dominance in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex and the effects of monocular deprivation. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 281, 267–283 (1978).

  11. 11.

    , & Recovery from the effects of monocular deprivation in kittens. J. Comp. Neurol. 176, 53–63 (1977).

  12. 12.

    et al. Correlated binocular activity guides recovery from monocular deprivation. Nature 416, 430–433 (2002).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Recovery of cortical binocularity and orientation selectivity after the critical period for ocular dominance plasticity. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 2113–2121 (2004).

  14. 14.

    Observations on monocular deprivation in mice. J. Neurophysiol. 41, 28–42 (1978).

  15. 15.

    & Experience-dependent plasticity of binocular responses in the primary visual cortex of the mouse. J. Neurosci. 16, 3274–3286 (1996).

  16. 16.

    , , , & Functional architecture of cortex revealed by optical imaging of intrinsic signals. Nature 324, 361–364 (1986).

  17. 17.

    , & Mapping retinotopic structure in mouse visual cortex with optical imaging. J. Neurosci. 22, 6549–6559 (2002).

  18. 18.

    & New paradigm for optical imaging: temporally encoded maps of intrinsic signal. Neuron 38, 529–545 (2003).

  19. 19.

    & How monocular deprivation shifts ocular dominance in visual cortex of young mice. Neuron 44, 917–923 (2004).

  20. 20.

    et al. NMDA receptor-dependent ocular dominance plasticity in adult visual cortex. Neuron 38, 977–985 (2003).

  21. 21.

    et al. A semi-persistent adult ocular dominance plasticity in visual cortex is stabilized by activated CREB. Learn. Mem. 11, 738–747 (2004).

  22. 22.

    , , & Multiple periods of functional ocular dominance plasticity in mouse visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 380–388 (2005).

  23. 23.

    & Inhibitory threshold for critical-period activation in primary visual cortex. Nature 404, 183–186 (2000).

  24. 24.

    et al. Reversible blockade of experience-dependent plasticity by calcineurin in mouse visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 791–796 (2005).

  25. 25.

    & Prolonged sensitivity to monocular deprivation in dark-reared cats. J. Neurophysiol. 43, 1026–1040 (1980).

  26. 26.

    et al. Reactivation of ocular dominance plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Science 298, 1248–1251 (2002).

  27. 27.

    , & Anatomical correlates of functional plasticity in mouse visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 19, 4388–4406 (1999).

  28. 28.

    , & Experience-dependent pruning of dendritic spines in visual cortex by tissue plasminogen activator. Neuron 44, 1031–1041 (2004).

  29. 29.

    , & Dendritic spine dynamics are regulated by monocular deprivation and extracellular matrix degradation. Neuron 44, 1021–1030 (2004).

  30. 30.

    Critical period regulation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 27, 549–579 (2004).

  31. 31.

    Mouse visual cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 413–420 (2003).

  32. 32.

    & Developmental plasticity of mouse visual acuity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 17, 167–173 (2003).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. King for comments on the manuscript and M. Sperling for computing help. This work was supported by the Max Planck Society (S.B.H., T.D.M.-F., T.B. and M.H.) and the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (T.D.M.-F.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Max-Planck-Institut für Neurobiologie, Am Klopferspitz 18, D–82152 Martinsried, Germany.

    • Sonja B Hofer
    • , Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel
    • , Tobias Bonhoeffer
    •  & Mark Hübener

Authors

  1. Search for Sonja B Hofer in:

  2. Search for Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel in:

  3. Search for Tobias Bonhoeffer in:

  4. Search for Mark Hübener in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Hübener.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1610

Further reading