Abstract
Attended objects are perceived to occur before unattended objects even when the two objects are presented simultaneously. This finding has led to the widespread view that attention modulates the speed of neural transmission in the various perceptual pathways. We recorded event-related potentials during a time-order judgment task to determine whether a reflexive shift of attention to a sudden sound modulates the speed of sensory processing in the human visual system. Attentional cueing influenced the perceived order of lateralized visual events but not the timing of event-related potentials in visual cortex. Attentional cueing did, however, enhance the amplitude of neural activity in visual cortex, which shows that attention-induced shifts in visual time-order perception can arise from modulations of signal strength rather than processing speed in the early visual-cortical pathways.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Titchener, E.N. Lectures on the Elementary Psychology of Feeling and Attention (Macmillan, New York, 1908).
Carrasco, M. & McElree, B. Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5363–5367 (2001).
Jaskowski, P. Selective attention and temporal-order judgment. Perception 22, 681–689 (1993).
Schneider, K.A. & Bavelier, D. Components of visual prior entry. Cognit. Psychol. 47, 333–366 (2003).
Shore, D.I., Spence, C. & Klein, R.M. Visual prior entry. Psychol. Sci. 12, 205–212 (2001).
Spence, C., Shore, D.I. & Klein, R.M. Multisensory prior entry. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 130, 799–832 (2001).
Stelmach, L.B. & Herdman, C.M. Directed attention and perception of temporal order. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 17, 539–550 (1991).
Stone, S.A. Prior entry in the auditory-tactile complication. Am. J. Psychol. 37, 284–287 (1926).
Downing, P.E. & Treisman, A.M. The line-motion illusion: Attention or impletion? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23, 768–779 (1997).
Frey, R.D. Selective attention, event perception and the criterion of acceptability principle: evidence supporting and rejecting the doctrine of prior entry. Hum. Mov. Sci. 9, 481–530 (1990).
Pashler, H.E. The Psychology of Attention (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998).
Schneider, K.A. & Bavelier, D. Components of visual prior entry. Cognit. Psychol. 47, 333–366 (2003).
Di Russo, F., Martinez, A. & Hillyard, S.A. Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. Cereb. Cortex 13, 486–499 (2003).
Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M.I., Pitzalis, S. & Hillyard, S.A. Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 95–111 (2001).
Heinze, H.J., Luck, S.J., Mangun, G.R. & Hillyard, S.A. Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75, 511–527 (1990).
Heinze, H.J. et al. Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature 372, 543–546 (1994).
Luck, S.J., Heinze, H.J., Mangun, G.R. & Hillyard, S.A. Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. II. Functional dissociation of P1 and N1 components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75, 528–542 (1990).
Mangun, G.R., Hopfinger, J.B., Kussmaul, C., Fletcher, E. & Heinze, H.J. Covariations in ERP and PET measures of spatial selective attention in human extrastriate visual cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 5, 273–279 (1997).
Hillyard, S.A. & Anllo-Vento, L. Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 781–787 (1998).
Dufour, A. Importance of attentional mechanisms in audiovisual links. Exp. Brain Res. 126, 215–222 (1999).
Frassinetti, F., Bolognini, N. & Làdavas, E. Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction. Exp. Brain Res. 147, 332–343 (2002).
McDonald, J.J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W.A. & Hillyard, S.A. Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception. Nature 407, 906–908 (2000).
McDonald, J.J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W.A., Di Russo, F. & Hillyard, S.A. Neural substrates of perceptual enhancement by crossmodal spatial attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15, 10–19 (2003).
Shimojo, S., Miyauchi, S. & Hikosaka, O. Visual motion sensation yielded by non-visually driven attention. Vision Res. 37, 1575–1580 (1997).
Woldorff, M.G. Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: analysis and correction. Psychophysiology 30, 98–119 (1993).
Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O. & Echallier, J.F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72, 184–187 (1989).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank D.R. Heraldez and M.M. Marlow for technical assistance and L.M. Ward for providing access to research equipment. This research was supported by grants from the National Institute for Mental Health (MH 25594), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (227959) and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Fig. 1
Grand-averaged ERPs obtained when the uncued target was presented 70 ms before the cued target, averaged separately according to which target was reported to appear first. (PDF 193 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDonald, J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Di Russo, F. et al. Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception. Nat Neurosci 8, 1197–1202 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1512
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1512
This article is cited by
-
Choice-dependent cross-modal interaction in the medial prefrontal cortex of rats
Molecular Brain (2021)
-
Cross-modal orienting of exogenous attention results in visual-cortical facilitation, not suppression
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Sex differences in vocalization are reflected by event-related potential components in the music frog
Animal Cognition (2020)
-
Cue–target onset asynchrony modulates interaction between exogenous attention and audiovisual integration
Cognitive Processing (2020)
-
Preference of spectral features in auditory processing for advertisement calls in the music frogs
Frontiers in Zoology (2019)