Article | Published:

Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation

Nature Neuroscience volume 7, pages 673677 (2004) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

As people find their way through their environment, objects at navigationally relevant locations can serve as crucial landmarks. The parahippocampal gyrus has previously been shown to be involved in object and scene recognition. In the present study, we investigated the neural representation of navigationally relevant locations. Healthy human adults viewed a route through a virtual museum with objects placed at intersections (decision points) or at simple turns (non-decision points). Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were acquired during subsequent recognition of the objects in isolation. Neural activity in the parahippocampal gyrus reflected the navigational relevance of an object's location in the museum. Parahippocampal responses were selectively increased for objects that occurred at decision points, independent of attentional demands. This increase occurred for forgotten as well as remembered objects, showing implicit retrieval of navigational information. The automatic storage of relevant object location in the parahippocampal gyrus provides a part of the neural mechanism underlying successful navigation.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Knowing where and getting there: a human navigation network. Science 280, 921–924 (1998).

  2. 2.

    , & (eds.) The Hippocampal and Parietal Foundations of Spatial Cognition (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999).

  3. 3.

    & The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely moving rat. Brain Res. 34, 171–175 (1971).

  4. 4.

    & The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map (Oxford, Clarendon, 1978).

  5. 5.

    , , , & Knowing where things are: parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual large-scale space. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 61–76 (1998).

  6. 6.

    , , & The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man. Cereb. Cortex 6, 823–829 (1996).

  7. 7.

    et al. Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation. Nature 425, 184–187 (2003).

  8. 8.

    et al. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 4398–4403 (2000).

  9. 9.

    , & The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. Neuron 35, 625–641 (2002).

  10. 10.

    , , & Hippocampal neurons encode information about different types of memory episodes occurring in the same location. Neuron 27, 623–633 (2000).

  11. 11.

    , , , & Brain activation during human navigation: gender-different neural network as substrate of performance. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 404–408 (2000).

  12. 12.

    , & Place representation within hippocampal networks is modified by long-term potentiation. Neuron 39, 843–853 (2003).

  13. 13.

    et al. Human hippocampal and parahippocampal activity during visual associative recognition memory for spatial and nonspatial stimulus configurations. J. Neurosci. 23, 9439–9444 (2003).

  14. 14.

    & Cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392, 598–601 (1998).

  15. 15.

    & Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 38, 347–358 (2003).

  16. 16.

    (ed.) Wayfinding Behavior (Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, 1999).

  17. 17.

    & Developmental differences in the ability to give route directions from a map. J. Environ. Psychol. 12, 175–185 (1992).

  18. 18.

    , , , & A cognitive activation study of memory for spatial relationships. Neuropsychologia 37, 829–841 (1999).

  19. 19.

    & Spatial descriptions as navigational aids: a cognitive analysis of route directions. Kognitionswissenschaft 7, 45–52 (1998).

  20. 20.

    & Two cortical visual systems. in Analysis of Visual Behavior (eds. Ingle, D.J., Goodale, M.A. & Mansfield, R.J.W.) 549–586 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1982).

  21. 21.

    & Automatic and effortful processes in memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 108, 356–388 (1979).

  22. 22.

    & Conscious and unconscious influences of memory for object location. Mem. Cognit. 29, 285–295 (2001).

  23. 23.

    , , & A specific role for the right parahippocampal gyrus in the retrieval of object-location: a positron emission tomography study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 8 588–602 (1996).

  24. 24.

    , & Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 631–632 (2002).

  25. 25.

    et al. Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 995–1002 (2002).

  26. 26.

    & Visual attention: insights from brain imaging. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 91–100 (2000).

  27. 27.

    , , & Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron 30, 829–841 (2001).

  28. 28.

    , , & Separate neural bases of two fundamental memory processes in the human medial temporal lobe. Science 276, 264–266 (1997).

  29. 29.

    , , , & Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. Science 281, 1185–1187 (1998).

  30. 30.

    , & Long-lasting cortical plasticity in the object naming system. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1329–1334 (2000).

  31. 31.

    , & Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science 287, 1269–1272 (2000).

  32. 32.

    & The Psychology of Sex Differences (Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1974).

  33. 33.

    How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using w2 and d. Am. Psychologist 36, 892–901 (1981).

  34. 34.

    Gender differences in wayfinding-strategies: relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles 30, 765–779 (1994).

  35. 35.

    , & Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. Cogn. Brain Res. 6, 351–360 (1998).

  36. 36.

    & A Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain (Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, 1988).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Fernández, P. Hagoort and M. Coles for helpful discussions and their comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Postbus 310, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

    • Gabriele Janzen
  2. F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

    • Gabriele Janzen
    •  & Miranda van Turennout

Authors

  1. Search for Gabriele Janzen in:

  2. Search for Miranda van Turennout in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Janzen.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1257

Further reading