Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Keeping the world a constant size: object constancy in human touch

Abstract

The perceived size of objects touching different regions of skin varies across the body surface by much less than is predicted from variations in tactile receptor density. Here we show that altering the visual experience of the body alters perceived tactile distances. We propose that the brain attempts to preserve tactile size constancy by rescaling the primary, distorted body-surface representation into object-centered space according to visual experience of the body.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Tactile distance perception task.
Figure 2: Distorted and undistorted views of the arm in experiments 2 and 3.
Figure 3: Viewing the body influences tactile distance perception.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weber, E.H. The Sense of Touch (H.E. Ross & D.J. Murray, trans.) (Academic, London, UK, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weinstein, S. in The Skin Senses (ed Kenshalo, D.R.) 195–218 (Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kurth, R. et al. NeuroReport 11, 1487–1491 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Green, B.G. Percept. Psychophys. 31, 315–323 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paillard, J., Michel, F. & Stelmach, G. Arch. Neurol. 40, 548–451 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kennett, S., Taylor-Clarke, M. & Haggard, P. Curr. Biol. 11, 1188–1191 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Penfield, W. & Rasmussen, T. The Cerebral Cortex of Man: a Clinical Study of Localization of Function (Macmillan, Oxford, UK, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boring, E.G. Am. J. Psychol. 77, 494–498 (1964).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marr, D. Vision (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calford, M.B. Neuroscience 111, 709–738 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Recanzone, G.H., Merzenich, M.M., Jenkins, W.M., Grajski, K.A. & Dinse, H.R. J. Neurophysiol. 67, 1031–1056 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramachandran, V.S. & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. Arch. Neurol. 57, 317–320 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gandevia, S.C. & Phegan, C.M.L. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 514, 609–616 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Graziano, M.S.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10418–10421 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M. & Iwamura, Y. NeuroReport 7, 2325–2330 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (M.T.C.), and a Leverhulme Trust research fellowship (P.H.). We thank J. Woodhouse, S. Kennett and D. Wolpert for advice and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Haggard.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Fig. 1

Bias in tactile distance judgment before and after viewing an enlarged video image of the hand. (JPG 31 kb)

Supplementary Note (PDF 7 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor-Clarke, M., Jacobsen, P. & Haggard, P. Keeping the world a constant size: object constancy in human touch. Nat Neurosci 7, 219–220 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1199

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1199

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing