Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control

Nature Neuroscience volume 4, pages 819–825 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

We describe a form of nonlinear decomposition that is well-suited for efficient encoding of natural signals. Signals are initially decomposed using a bank of linear filters. Each filter response is then rectified and divided by a weighted sum of rectified responses of neighboring filters. We show that this decomposition, with parameters optimized for the statistics of a generic ensemble of natural images or sounds, provides a good characterization of the nonlinear response properties of typical neurons in primary visual cortex or auditory nerve, respectively. These results suggest that nonlinear response properties of sensory neurons are not an accident of biological implementation, but have an important functional role.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Linear filter responses to example image and sound stimuli.
Figure 2: Joint statistics of a typical natural image as seen through two linear filters.
Figure 3: Examples of variance dependency in natural signals.
Figure 4: Generic normalization model for vision and audition.
Figure 5: Classical nonlinear behaviors of V1 neurons.
Figure 6: Suppression of responses to optimal stimuli by masking stimuli.
Figure 7: Nonlinear changes in tuning curves at different input levels.

References

  1. Attneave, F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psych. Rev. 61,183–193 (1954).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barlow, H. B. in Sensory Communication (ed. Rosenblith, W. A.) 217–234 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simoncelli, E. & Olshausen, B. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 1193–1216 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olshausen, B. A. & Field, D. J. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381, 607–609 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell, A. J. & Sejnowski, T. J. The 'independent components' of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Res. 37, 3327–3338 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Hateren, J. H. & van der Schaaf, A. Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 265, 359–366 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell, A. J. & Sejnowski, T. J. Learning the higher-order structure of a natural sound. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 7, 261–266 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geisler, D. From Sound to Synapse: Physiology of the Mammalian Ear (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shapley, R. & Enroth-Cugell, C. Visual adaptation and retinal gain control. Prog. Retin. Res. 3, 263–346 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carandini, M., Heeger, D. J. & Movshon, J. A. Linearity and normalization in simple cells of the macaque primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 17, 8621–8644 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Javel, E., Geisler, D. & Ravindran, A. Two-tone suppression in auditory nerve of the cat: rate-intensity and temporal analyses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 1093–1104 (1978).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Knierim, J. J. & Van Essen, D. C. Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 67, 961–980 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. DeAngelis, G. C., Freeman, R. D. & Ohzawa, I. The organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in the cat's visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 68, 144–163 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sillito, A. M., Grieve, K. L., Jones, H. E., Cudeiro, J. & Davis, J. Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities. Nature 378, 492–496 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Levitt, J. B. & Lund, J. S. Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex. Nature 387, 73–76 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rose, J. E., Anderson, D. J. & Brugge, J. F. Some effects of stimulus intensity on response of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 34, 685–699 (1971).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sceniak, M. P., Ringach, D. L., Hawken, M. J. & Shapley, R. Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 733–739 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kapadia, M. K., Westheimer, G. & Gilbert, C. D. Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 21, 12073–12078 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wainwright, M. J., Simoncelli, E. P. & Willsky, A. S. Random cascades on wavelet trees and their use in modeling and analyzing natural imagery. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis (in press).

  20. Heeger, D. J. Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Vis. Neurosci. 9, 181–198 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Geisler, W. S. & Albrecht, D. G. Cortical neurons: isolation of contrast gain control. Vision Res. 8, 1409–1410 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Skottun, B. C., Freeman, R. D., Sclar, G., Ohzawa, I. & Freeman, R. D. The effects of contrast on visual orientation and spatial frequency discrimination: a comparison of single cells and behavior. J. Neurophysiol. 57, 773–786.

  23. Bonds, A. B. Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex. Vis. Neurosci. 2, 41–55 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cavanaugh, J. R. Properties of the Receptive Field Surround in Macaque Primary Visual Cortex. Thesis, Center for Neural Science, New York Univ. (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simoncelli, E. P. & Schwartz, O. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 11 (eds. Kearns, M. S., Solla, S. A. & Cohn, D. A.) 153–159 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Geisler, W. S., Perry, J. S., Super, B. J. & Gallogly, D. P. Edge co-occurance in natural images predicts contour grouping performance. Vision Res. 41, 711–724 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sigman, M., Cecchi, G. A., Gilbert, C. D. & Magnasco, M. O. On a common circle: natural scenes and Gestalt rules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1935–1940 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lyon, R. F. in The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing (ed. Dallos, P. et al.) 395–420 (Springer, Berlin, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, K. & Shamma, S. Self-normalization and noise-robustness in early auditory representations. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Proc. 2, 421–435 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abbott, L. F., Varela, J. A., Sen, K. & Nelson, S. B. Synaptic depression and cortical gain control. Science 275, 220–224 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Borg-Graham, L. J., Monier, C. & Frénac, Y. Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons. Nature 393, 369–373 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hirsch, J. A., Alonso, J.-M., Reid, R. C. & Martinez, L. M. Synaptic integration in striate cortical simple cells. J. Neurosci. 18, 9517–9528 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Anderson, J., Carandini, M. & Ferster, D. Orientation tuning of input conductance, excitation, and inhibition in cat primary cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 909–926 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Victor, J. D. The dynamics of the cat retinal X cell centre. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 386, 219–246 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ruderman, D. L. & Bialek, W. Statistics of natural images: scaling in the woods. Phys. Rev. Letters 73, 814–817 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao, H. B. & Santos-Sacchi, J. Auditory collusion and a coupled couple of outer hair cells. Nature 399, 359–362 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Maffei, L. & Fiorentini, A. The unresponsive regions of visual cortical receptive fields. Vision Res. 16, 1131–1139 (1976).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nelson, J. I. & Frost, B. J. Intracortical facilitation among co-oriented, coaxially aligned simple cells in cat striate cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 61, 54–61 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gilbert, C. D. & Wiesel, T. N. The influence of contextual stimuli on the orientation selectivity of cells in primary visual cortex of the cat. Vision Res. 30, 1689–1701 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Delgutte, B. in Auditory Computation (eds. Hawkins, H. & McMullen, T.) 157–220 (Springer, Berlin, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Field, D. J., Hayes, A. & Hess, R. F. Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local “association field.” Vision Res. 33, 173–193 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Foley, J. M. Human luminance pattern mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 11, 1710–1719 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Graham, N. & Sutter, A. Normalization: contrast-gain control in simple (Fourier) and complex (non-Fourier) pathways of pattern vision. Vision Res. 40, 2737–2761 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rieke, F., Bodnar, D. A. & Bialek, W. Naturalistic stimuli increase the rate and efficiency of information transmission by primary auditory afferents. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 262, 259–265 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Barlow, H. B. & Foldiak, P. in The Computing Neuron (eds. Durbin, R., Miall, C. & Mitchinson, G.) 54–72 (Addison-Wellesley, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wainwright, M. J., Schwartz, O. & Simoncelli, E. P. in Probabilistic Models of the Brain: Perception and Neural Function (eds. Rao, R., Olshausen, B. & Lewicki, M., MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2001, in press).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vinje, W. E. & Gallant, J. L. Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science 287, 1273–1276 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nirenberg, S., Carcieri, S. M., Jacobs, A. L. & Latham, P. E. Retinal ganglion cells act largely as independent encoders. Nature 411, 698–701 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Slaney, M. An efficient implementation of the Patterson and Holdworth auditory filter bank. Apple Technical Report 35, 1993.

  50. Simoncelli, E. P., Freeman, W. T., Adelson, E. H. & Heeger, D. J. Shiftable multi-scale transforms. IEEE Trans. Info. Theory 38, 587–607 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Cavanaugh, W. Bair, and J.A. Movshon for providing us with physiological data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, Room 809, New York, 10003, New York, USA

    Odelia Schwartz

  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Center for Neural Science, and Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, 10003, New York, USA

    Eero P. Simoncelli

Authors
  1. Odelia Schwartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eero P. Simoncelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eero P. Simoncelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwartz, O., Simoncelli, E. Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control. Nat Neurosci 4, 819–825 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/90526

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/90526

Further reading

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing