Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Does the brain model Newton's laws?

Nature Neuroscience volume 4, pages 693–694 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

How does the nervous system synchronize movements to catch a falling ball? According to one theory, only sensory information is used to estimate time-to-contact (TTC) with an approaching object1,2; alternatively, implicit knowledge about physics may come into play3,4. Here we show that astronauts initiated catching movements earlier in 0 g than in 1 g, which demonstrates that the brain uses an internal model of gravity to supplement sensory information when estimating TTC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Test of TTC estimation during ball catching in 0 g.
Figure 2: Anticipatory motor responses during catching in 0 and 1 g.
Figure 3: Timing of forearm rotations and biceps EMG compared to first- and second-order model predictions for different TTC thresholds (λ).

References

  1. Gibson, J. J. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, D. N. in Tutorials in Motor Behavior (eds. Stelmach, G. E. & Requin, J.) 281–296 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1980).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Lacquaniti, F., Carrozzo, M. & Borghese, N. A. in Multisensory Control of Movement (ed. Berthoz, A.) 379–393 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1993).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Hubbard, T. L. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2, 322–338 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, D. N., Young, D. S., Reddish, P. E., Lough, S. & Clayton, T. M. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 35, 333–346 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Savelsbergh, G. J., Whiting, H. T., Burden, A. M. & Bartlett, R. M. Exp. Brain Res. 89, 223–228 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rushton, S. K. & Wann, J. P. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 186–190 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peper, L., Bootsma, R. J., Mestre, D. R. & Bakker, F. C. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 591–612 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, D. N., Craig, C. M. & Grealy, M. A. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266, 2029–2035 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tresilian, J. R. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 301–310 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Werkhoven, P., Snippe, H. P. & Toet, A. Vision Res. 32, 2313–2329 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lacquaniti, F. & Maioli, C. J. Neurosci. 9, 134–148 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Collewijn, H. Brain Res. 36, 59–70 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lackner, J. R. & DiZio, P. Exp. Brain Res. 130, 2–26 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Regan, D. J. Sports Sci. 15, 533–558 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support was provided by the French space agency CNES, the Italian space agency ASI and the Italian Ministry of Health. We thank the NASA Flight Research Management Branch, the Lockheed Martin Space Operations Company, the Kinélite development team, the STS-90 astronauts (S. Altman, J. Buckey, A. Dunlap, K. Hire, R. Linnehan, C. Mukai, J. Pawelczyk, R. Searfoss, D. Williams) and M. Venet, A. Lee, D. McMahon, B. Marchiel, M. Pias, and F. Silvagnoli for development of the flight experiment; D. Angelini, M. Ehrette, P. Leboucher, P. Prévost and M. Zaoui for technical assistance; L. Amadio, M. Buderer, A. Guëll, O. Marsal and S. McCollum for program support; and D. Alais, M. Amorim, M. Carrozzo, J. Droulez, R. Grasso, Y. Ivanenko, J. Sanes, P. Senot and I. Viaud-Delmon for comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The European Laboratory for the Neuroscience of Action, Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Perception et de l'Action, CNRS and Collège de France, 11 place Marcelin Berthelot, Paris, 75005, France

    J. McIntyre & A. Berthoz

  2. The European Laboratory for the Neuroscience of Action, Sezione di Fisiologia Umana, IRCCS Fondazione, Santa Lucia via Ardeatina 306, Rome, 00179, Italy

    J. McIntyre, M. Zago & F. Lacquaniti

  3. Centro di Bio-Medicina Spaziale, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, via O. Raimondo 1, Rome, 00173, Italy

    F. Lacquaniti

Authors
  1. J. McIntyre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Zago
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Berthoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Lacquaniti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to J. McIntyre or M. Zago.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McIntyre, J., Zago, M., Berthoz, A. et al. Does the brain model Newton's laws?. Nat Neurosci 4, 693–694 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/89477

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/89477

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing