Review Article | Published:

Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging

Nature Neuroscience volume 20, pages 327339 (2017) | Download Citation


We review the aspects that uniquely characterize magnetoencephalography (MEG) among the techniques available to explore and resolve brain function and dysfunction. While emphasizing its specific strengths in terms of millisecond source imaging, we also identify and discuss current practical challenges, in particular in signal extraction and interpretation. We also take issue with some perceived disadvantages of MEG, including the misconception that the technique is redundant with electroencephalography. Overall, MEG contributes uniquely to our deeper comprehension of both regional and large-scale brain dynamics: from the functions of neural oscillations and the nature of event-related brain activation, to the mechanisms of functional connectivity between regions and the emergence of modes of network communication in brain systems. We expect MEG to play an increasing and pivotal role in the elucidation of these grand mechanistic principles of cognitive, systems and clinical neuroscience.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Magnetoencephalography: evidence of magnetic fields produced by alpha-rhythm currents. Science 161, 784–786 (1968). The first demonstration of brain magnetic fields measured outside the human scalp. The core principle of using a specially designed multilayer magnetically shielded chamber is introduced. Signal averaging reduced environmental magnetic noise and revealed modulations of alpha rhythms related to eyes open/closed.

  2. 2.

    Magnetoencephalography: detection of the brain's electrical activity with a superconducting magnetometer. Science 175, 664–666 (1972). The seminal demonstration that SQUID superconducting detectors greatly improved the sensitivity of MEG. Also features simultaneous EEG and MEG recordings with the first discussion concerning their respective merits. Also first recording of MEG patient data.

  3. 3.

    , , , & Magnetoencephalography: theory, instrumentation and applications to the noninvasive study of human brain function. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 413–497 (1993). A comprehensive and authoritative review of the technique, with important details concerning instrumentation, the physics and models. Some 25 years after, this reference remains a must-read.

  4. 4.

    The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. 2 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1964).A classic textbook on electromagnetism that remains a reference in content and clarity of style.

  5. 5.

    , & Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 18, 14–30 (2001). MEG and EEG methods and models explained from an electrical engineering perspective.

  6. 6.

    et al. Time-frequency analysis reveals decreased high-frequency oscillations in writer's cramp. Brain 130, 198–205 (2007). High-frequency oscillations (HFO; 500 to 700 Hz) measured in patients with dystonia and healthy controls following median nerve stimulation. These HFOs had been suggested to reflect the activity of thalamocortical and/or intracortical neurons bursting at high frequencies, which is altered in the pathophysiology of focal dystonia. Results show that HFO in patients with writer's cramp are strongly decreased in power and disorganized in time.

  7. 7.

    , , , & Ultra-low-noise EEG/MEG systems enable bimodal noninvasive detection of spike-like human somatosensory evoked responses at 1kHz. Physiol. Meas. 36, 357–368 (2015). Simultaneous recordings of temporally distinct ultrafast (in the 500 Hz and 1 kHz ranges) neural responses to median nerve stimulation using custom low-noise EEG and MEG apparatus. The authors argue these neural high-frequency processes are related to multi-unit spike discharges.

  8. 8.

    & Contributions of principal neocortical neurons to magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography signals. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 575, 925–936 (2006).

  9. 9.

    EEG and MEG: relevance to neuroscience. Neuron 80, 1112–1128 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Rhythms of the Brain. (Oxford University Press, USA, 2006). A classic textbook that reviews considerable ground in electrophysiology to explain how the polyrhythmic activity of the brain may support brain functions. It covers a wealth of concepts from physiology, evolutionary biology, connectomics and more in a clear and eloquent style.

  11. 11.

    & Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Field (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004). A classic EEG textbook for researchers and clinical electrophysiologists.

  12. 12.

    , , , & Infants' brain responses to speech suggest analysis by synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 11238–11245 (2014).

  13. 13.

    et al. Flexible head-casts for high spatial precision MEG. J. Neurosci. Methods 276, 38–45 (2017).

  14. 14.

    & Towards the utilization of EEG as a brain imaging tool. Neuroimage 61, 371–385 (2012).

  15. 15.

    et al. BabyMEG: a whole-head pediatric magnetoencephalography system for human brain development research. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87, 094301 (2016).

  16. 16.

    & NMR detection with an atomic magnetometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 123001 (2005).

  17. 17.

    , , , & Magnetoencephalography of epilepsy with a microfabricated atomic magnetrode. J. Neurosci. 34, 14324–14327 (2014).

  18. 18.

    , & SQUID-detected ultra-low field MRI. J. Magn. Reson. 228, 1–15 (2013).

  19. 19.

    Controversies in neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in localization of interictal epileptiform activity: pro. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 1001–1009 (2004).

  20. 20.

    Controversies in clinical neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity: con. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 1010–1020 (2004). An interesting read when paired with the 'pro-MEG' counterpoint piece represented by ref. 19. The author does not entirely conclude that MEG is useless and redundant with EEG. He advocates for joint data acquisitions of the two modalities, especially for the clinical evaluation of epilepsy, where EEG has set the standard in clinical electrophysiology.

  21. 21.

    , , , & Transient induced gamma-band response in EEG as a manifestation of miniature saccades. Neuron 58, 429–441 (2008).

  22. 22.

    et al. Thinking activates EMG in scalp electrical recordings. Clin. Neurophysiol. 119, 1166–1175 (2008).

  23. 23.

    High-frequency brain activity and muscle artifacts in MEG/EEG: a review and recommendations. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 138 (2013).

  24. 24.

    et al. Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Neuroimage 65, 349–363 (2013).

  25. 25.

    , & Reducing multi-sensor data to a single time course that reveals experimental effects. BMC Neurosci. 14, 122 (2013). An interesting application of spatial filtering techniques, which are more typically used as a means to produce images of source activity in MEG. The authors propose to use the methodology to reduce the dimension of sensor data volumes to that of a single time-varying scalar measure, which is designed to emphasize possible experimental effects.

  26. 26.

    , & The neural dynamics of attentional selection in natural scenes. J. Neurosci. 36, 10522–10528 (2016). One clear application of emergent signal classification techniques based on MEG sensor analysis and multivariate decoding. The results identify the emergence of rapid neural representations of visual objects in a cluttered scene as a function of top-down attentional processes.

  27. 27.

    , , & Spontaneous fluctuations in neural responses to heartbeats predict visual detection. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 612–618 (2014). First demonstration in humans that neural events locked to heartbeats before stimulus onset predict performance in a visual detection task. Heartbeat-related neural signatures were identified in the MEG sensor data and further mapped anatomically. Here MEG combined with electrocardiography provided superb multimodal capacity and the ability to finely establish the chronometry of task and physiological events.

  28. 28.

    et al. MEG detection of delayed auditory evoked responses in autism spectrum disorders: towards an imaging biomarker for autism. Autism Res. 3, 8–18 (2010).

  29. 29.

    , , & Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10240–10245 (2007).

  30. 30.

    et al. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG. Neuroimage 100, 590–607 (2014).

  31. 31.

    et al. Influences of skull segmentation inaccuracies on EEG source analysis. Neuroimage 62, 418–431 (2012).

  32. 32.

    et al. The role of blood vessels in high-resolution volume conductor head modeling of EEG. Neuroimage 128, 193–208 (2016).

  33. 33.

    , , , & Conductivity tensor mapping of the human brain using diffusion tensor MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11697–11701 (2001).

  34. 34.

    et al. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG. Neuroimage 127, 484–495 (2016).

  35. 35.

    , & Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study. Neuroimage 51, 145–163 (2010).

  36. 36.

    , , & Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses. Neuroimage 110, 60–77 (2015).

  37. 37.

    , & Complete electrode model in EEG: relationship and differences to the point electrode model. Phys. Med. Biol. 57, 999–1017 (2012).

  38. 38.

    , , , & A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 107, 159–173 (1998).

  39. 39.

    et al. Evaluation of inverse methods and head models for EEG source localization using a human skull phantom. Phys. Med. Biol. 46, 77–96 (2001).

  40. 40.

    et al. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI. Brain Topogr. 28, 87–94 (2015).

  41. 41.

    , , & Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46, 522–534 (1999).

  42. 42.

    , , , & The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex. Neuroimage 36, 1225–1235 (2007).

  43. 43.

    & A quantitative assessment of the sensitivity of whole-head MEG to activity in the adult human cortex. Neuroimage 16, 638–650 (2002).

  44. 44.

    et al. Modelling and detecting deep brain activity with MEG and EEG. Biomed. Eng. Res. 30, 133–138 (2009).

  45. 45.

    & Assessment of subcortical source localization using deep brain activity imaging model with minimum norm operators: a MEG study. PLoS One 8, e59856 (2013).

  46. 46.

    & The neural subjective frame: from bodily signals to perceptual consciousness. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. B Biol. Sci. 369, 2013.0208 (2014).

  47. 47.

    , , , & The phase of thalamic alpha activity modulates cortical gamma-band activity: evidence from resting-state MEG recordings. J. Neurosci. 33, 17827–17835 (2013).

  48. 48.

    , , , & Distinct contributions of human hippocampal theta to spatial cognition and anxiety. Hippocampus 22, 1848–1859 (2012).

  49. 49.

    et al. Evoked amygdala responses to negative faces revealed by adaptive MEG beamformers. Brain Res. 1244, 103–112 (2008).

  50. 50.

    et al. MEG evidence for dynamic amygdala modulations by gaze and facial emotions. PLoS One 8, e74145 (2013).

  51. 51.

    , , & Rapid amygdala responses during trace fear conditioning without awareness. PLoS One 9, e96803 (2014).

  52. 52.

    , & Sources of auditory brainstem responses revisited: contribution by magnetoencephalography. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1772–1782 (2009).

  53. 53.

    , , , & Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG. Nat. Commun. 7, 11070 (2016). Recent evidence of the ability of MEG to detect the deepest sources of signal from the cerebrum. Although the main result of the study was the demonstration that the auditory cortex is involved in basic frequency-following responses that were long thought to be produced solely by brainstem nuclei, the authors also demonstrated the fast cascade of event-related auditory responses from the inferior colliculus and other brainstem substructures, before the cortex responded.

  54. 54.

    , , & High-resolution retinotopic maps estimated with magnetoencephalography. Neuroimage 145 (Pt. A),107–117 (2017).

  55. 55.

    , , , & Discrimination of cortical laminae using MEG. Neuroimage 102, 885–893 (2014).

  56. 56.

    , & Can visual information encoded in cortical columns be decoded from magnetoencephalography data in humans? Neuroimage 121, 193–204 (2015).

  57. 57.

    The AAN Board of Directors. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Model Policy technical report (American Academy of Neurology, 2009).

  58. 58.

    , , & Twenty years of functional near-infrared spectroscopy: introduction for the special issue. Neuroimage 85, 1–5 (2014).

  59. 59.

    , , , & Spectral signal space projection algorithm for frequency domain MEG and EEG denoising, whitening, and source imaging. Neuroimage 56, 78–92 (2011).

  60. 60.

    & Combining MEG and EEG source modeling in epilepsy evaluations. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 27, 360–371 (2010).

  61. 61.

    , & Movement priming of EEG/MEG brain responses for action-words characterizes the link between language and action. Cortex 74, 262–276 (2016).

  62. 62.

    et al. Simultaneous MEG and intracranial EEG recordings during attentive reading. Neuroimage 45, 1289–1304 (2009). The first demonstration of simultaneous MEG and intracranial stereotactic EEG recordings in humans. Such data offers unique opportunities to confront MEG source imaging to ground-truth electrophysiological data obtained directly from the cortex and to improve models and methods of signal extraction. For practical and patient-safety reasons, it is not possible to obtain high-density scalp EEG recordings simultaneously with intracranial recordings.

  63. 63.

    et al. Distinct oscillatory STN-cortical loops revealed by simultaneous MEG and local field potential recordings in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neuroimage 55, 1159–1168 (2011).

  64. 64.

    , & Movement related dynamics of subthalmo-cortical alpha connectivity in Parkinson's disease. Neuroimage 70, 132–142 (2013).

  65. 65.

    , & Cortical magnetoencephalography of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of postural tremor. Brain Stimul. 5, 616–624 (2012).

  66. 66.

    et al. Analysis of simultaneous MEG and intracranial LFP recordings during deep brain stimulation: a protocol and experimental validation. J. Neurosci. Methods 261, 29–46 (2016). An experimental tour de force MEG data were recorded simultaneously with intracranial EEG and during deep brain stimulation (DBS). This research contributes to a better understanding of the physiological effects of DBS and the optimization of DBS parameters, such as the locus and rate of stimulation, to predict responsiveness to treatment and maximize functional outcome.

  67. 67.

    , & Transcranial modulation of brain oscillatory responses: a concurrent tDCS-MEG investigation. Neuroimage 140, 20–32 (2016). This and the next article demonstrate how external stimulation techniques can modulate specific brain rhythms, with eventually possible amelioration of brain functions. The fact that MEG sensors are not directly attached to the scalp leaves more room to use brain stimulation devices in the most flexible manner while still benefiting from high-density brain recordings. These procedures are more challenging with high-density EEG.

  68. 68.

    et al. Eyes wide shut: transcranial alternating current stimulation drives alpha rhythm in a state dependent manner. Sci. Rep. 6, 27138 (2016).

  69. 69.

    , & Targeted reinforcement of neural oscillatory activity with real-time neuroimaging feedback. Neuroimage 88, 54–60 (2014). A proof-of-concept study of neurofeedback training using MEG source imaging. The data show the positive effect of training in targeted brain regions and for the specific type of brain activity that was targeted.

  70. 70.

    et al. Real-time MEG neurofeedback training of posterior alpha activity modulates subsequent visual detection performance. Neuroimage 107, 323–332 (2015).

  71. 71.

    , & Academic software applications for electromagnetic brain mapping using MEG and EEG. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 972050 (2011). This article introduces a journal special issue entirely dedicated to academic software packages for MEG and EEG scientists.

  72. 72.

    Machine learning in medicine. Circulation 132, 1920–1930 (2015).

  73. 73.

    , & Resolving human object recognition in space and time. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 455–462 (2014).

  74. 74.

    & Characterizing the dynamics of mental representations: the temporal generalization method. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18, 203–210 (2014).

  75. 75.

    et al. Testing sensory evidence against mnemonic templates. Elife 4, e09000 (2015).

  76. 76.

    , & Similarity-based fusion of MEG and fMRI reveals spatio-temporal dynamics in human cortex during visual object recognition. Cereb. Cortex 26, 3563–3579 (2016).

  77. 77.

    , , , & Comparison of deep neural networks to spatio-temporal cortical dynamics of human visual object recognition reveals hierarchical correspondence. Sci. Rep. 6, 27755 (2016).

  78. 78.

    et al. Towards effective and rewarding data sharing. Neuroinformatics 1, 289–295 (2003).

  79. 79.

    & A practical guide for improving transparency and reproducibility in neuroimaging research. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002506 (2016).

  80. 80.

    et al. The NKI-Rockland sample: a model for accelerating the pace of discovery science in psychiatry. Front. Neurosci. 6, 152 (2012).

  81. 81.

    et al. The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: a review of papers published since its inception. Alzheimers Dement. 8 (Suppl. 1), S1–S68 (2012).

  82. 82.

    & Neuroinformatics software applications supporting electronic data capture, management, and sharing for the neuroimaging community. Neuropsychol. Rev. 25, 356–368 (2015).

  83. 83.

    et al. The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition perspective. Neuroimage 62, 2222–2231 (2012).

  84. 84.

    et al. OMEGA: the Open MEG archive. Neuroimage 124 (Pt. B), 1182–1187 (2016).

  85. 85.

    et al. The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample. Neuroimage 144 (Pt. B), 262–269 (2017).

  86. 86.

    & Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J. Neurosci. Methods 164, 177–190 (2007).

  87. 87.

    , , , & [MEG]PLS: a pipeline for MEG data analysis and partial least squares statistics. Neuroimage 124 (Pt. A), 181–193 (2016).

  88. 88.

    , & Scaling brain size, keeping timing: evolutionary preservation of brain rhythms. Neuron 80, 751–764 (2013).

  89. 89.

    What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453, 869–878 (2008).

  90. 90.

    Uses, misuses, new uses and fundamental limitations of magnetic resonance imaging in cognitive science. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 371, 20150349 (2016).

  91. 91.

    , & Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7900–7905 (2016).

  92. 92.

    et al. Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science 295, 690–694 (2002).

  93. 93.

    The restless brain. Brain Connect. 1, 3–12 (2011).

  94. 94.

    , & The origin of extracellular fields and currents—EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 407–420 (2012).

  95. 95.

    & Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1857–1865 (2009).

  96. 96.

    et al. Multimodal description of whole brain connectivity: a comparison of resting state MEG, fMRI, and DWI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 20–34 (2016).

  97. 97.

    , , , & Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412, 150–157 (2001).

  98. 98.

    & Neuronal correlates of spontaneous fluctuations in fMRI signals in monkey visual cortex: implications for functional connectivity at rest. Hum. Brain Mapp. 29, 751–761 (2008).

  99. 99.

    , , , & Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10238–10243 (2010).

  100. 100.

    et al. Investigating the electrophysiological basis of resting state networks using magnetoencephalography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16783–16788 (2011).

  101. 101.

    & The brain's resting-state activity is shaped by synchronized cross-frequency coupling of neural oscillations. Neuroimage 111, 26–35 (2015). First large-scale and noninvasive demonstration of phase-amplitude coupling between oscillatory rhythms across the human brain. The article also introduces a new mechanistic framework for inter-regional communication based on this phenomenon and provides evidence that resting-state networks can be identified accordingly.

  102. 102.

    & The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 506–515 (2010).

  103. 103.

    Grouping of brain rhythms in corticothalamic systems. Neuroscience 137, 1087–1106 (2006).

  104. 104.

    et al. High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science 313, 1626–1628 (2006). The first evidence of cross-frequency phase-amplitude coupling between theta and gamma oscillations in the human brain. Recordings were from cortical electrodes in a patient volunteer.

  105. 105.

    & A critical note on the definition of phase-amplitude cross-frequency coupling. J. Neurosci. Methods 201, 438–443 (2011).

  106. 106.

    , , & Temporal coding organized by coupled alpha and gamma oscillations prioritize visual processing. Trends Neurosci. 37, 357–369 (2014).

  107. 107.

    et al. Alpha-beta and gamma rhythms subserve feedback and feedforward influences among human visual cortical areas. Neuron 89, 384–397 (2016).

  108. 108.

    et al. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. (2016).

  109. 109.

    , & MEG: An Introduction to Methods (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010). This first textbook entirely dedicated to MEG methods is an excellent gateway for trainees and scientists intrigued by the technique.

  110. 110.

    & Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 511–517 (2012). An excellent review of how neuronal oscillations identified with MEG source imaging are engaged by the prosodic properties of speech at multiple time scales. The authors argue from an evolutionary perspective that oscillations participate in the foundations of speech and language processing, with the engagement of auditory and motor tuning.

  111. 111.

    On the neural mechanisms subserving consciousness and attention. Front. Psychol. 2, 397 (2012). This and the next thorough review of the neuroscience of consciousness survey both theoretical foundations and related experimental techniques. The focus and contribution of MEG are on the dynamical aspects of the timing of brain events involved in the emergence of the conscious experience.

  112. 112.

    & Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron 70, 200–227 (2011).

  113. 113.

    & Magnetoencephalography in the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 46, 19–26 (2015). A thorough review of the unique value of MEG in the evaluation of severe epilepsy cases.

  114. 114.

    , , & Magnetoencephalography in the preoperative evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 14, 446 (2014).

  115. 115.

    et al. Prospective MEG biomarkers in ASD: pre-clinical evidence and clinical promise of electrophysiological signatures. Yale J. Biol. Med. 88, 25–36 (2015). A review of how MEG can provide unique insight and practical markers of functional impairments in ASD.

  116. 116.

    , & Physiological and pathological oscillatory networks in the human motor system. J. Physiol. Paris 99, 3–7 (2006). A thorough review of how MEG imaging contributes to elucidating the brain networks affected in a variety of movement disorders. The method for dynamic imaging of coherent sources is reviewed as a means to identify and analyze cerebral oscillatory networks in health and pathology with MEG. The particular role and experimental evidence of the involvement of a cerebello-thalamo-premotor-motor cortical network are discussed in details in the context of Parkinson's disease.

  117. 117.

    , & MEG-measured auditory steady-state oscillations show high test-retest reliability: a sensor and source-space analysis. Neuroimage 122, 417–426 (2015). Auditory steady-state responses represent another electrophysiological marker that is readily and robustly measured with MEG. These relatively simple signals are proposed to be used in the evaluation of neuropsychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia.

  118. 118.

    et al. The pace of prosodic phrasing couples the listener's cortex to the reader's voice. Hum. Brain Mapp. 34, 314–326 (2013). A great demonstration of coupling between auditory speech signals and cortical activity using an ecologically valid continuous listening task. This study illustrates the capacity of MEG to produce brain maps of activity that are coherent with a peripheral, natural signal; here, throat contractions from the speech production of an individual. The temporal resolution of MEG imaging enabled the comparison between brain activity related to multiple temporal scales in speech rhythm and phrasing.

  119. 119.

    , , , & Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 158–164 (2016). Another beautiful example of how MEG can track the brain activity related to the multiscale dynamics of sensory and speech signals. Results show that cortical activity at different timescales corresponded to the time course of abstract linguistic structures at different hierarchical levels, such as words, phrases and sentences.

  120. 120.

    & Cortical entrainment to music and its modulation by expertise. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6233–E6242 (2015). The dynamical ability of brain signals to be entrained by speech at multiple time scales corresponding to various hierarchical structures of spoken language (see previous two references) are further tested here in the context of music perception, with an emphasis on musical training. The data from musicians show that cortical entrainment is enhanced by years of musical training.

  121. 121.

    et al. Phase delays within visual cortex shape the response to steady-state visual stimulation. Neuroimage 54, 1919–1929 (2011). Tonic visual responses in occipital cortex are induced by steady-state stimulation. The study shows how such procedures enhance SNR in MEG imaging. It also allows measurement of phase differences between stimulus properties and responses at different brain sites that can be converted into time delays caused by neural signal propagation and/or processing.

  122. 122.

    , , & Spatial attention increases high-frequency gamma synchronisation in human medial visual cortex. Neuroimage 79, 295–303 (2013). MEG was used to explore sustained gamma activity in human early visual cortex, a hallmark of processes engaged by spatial attention. These signals are more ambiguous in EEG owing to possible confounds from muscle activity or eye saccades. Results show that stimulus- and goal-driven modulations of attention may be mediated at different frequencies within the gamma range in the early visual cortex.

  123. 123.

    & Neural mechanisms of object-based attention. Science 344, 424–427 (2014). The authors used MEG and fMRI to separate rapid neuronal responses to attended and unattended objects. Delays as short as 20 ms between frontal and parahippocampal and basal posterior temporal regions were identified in a directed manner via measures of coupled oscillations. This study is a beautiful example of how MEG imaging contributes to identifying the dynamical flow of information processing in the brain.

  124. 124.

    , , & Distributed attention is implemented through theta-rhythmic gamma modulation. Curr. Biol. 25, 2332–2337 (2015). This article provides more compelling evidence that the phase of ongoing brain rhythms around 8 Hz that precede the onset of target stimuli of interest influences performance. Specifically, the authors test how this 8-Hz rhythm can implement the sequential sampling of multiple target locations in relation to gamma fluctuations in a visual attention task and explain the observed decrease in behavioral performances. The MEG findings suggest that theta rhythms implement an attentional sampling process that is continual and synchronized with power fluctuations in the gamma band.

  125. 125.

    et al. Coherent neural representation of hand speed in humans revealed by MEG imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7676–7681 (2007). This study is another demonstration of the powerful approach that consists in revealing the brain regions whose MEG source activity is coherent with a signal of reference. Results show that theta-band activity in sensorimotor regions is coherent with the instantaneous velocity of contralateral hand movements. The study also shows that further coherent cortico-cortical activity during movement performance spreads in a network of regions involving the supplementary motor area, dorsal parietal lobules and the ipsilateral cerebellum.

  126. 126.

    & Magnetoencephalography: from SQUIDs to neuroscience. Neuroimage 61, 386–396 (2012). A thorough review of MEG in neuroscience, with an emphasis on MEG's contributions to our understanding of sensory and cognitive processing, motor systems, plasticity and the neuroscience of language and social interactions.

  127. 127.

    & Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186–198 (2009).

  128. 128.

    Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect. 1, 13–36 (2011).

  129. 129.

    & Predictive coding under the free-energy principle. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 364, 1211–1221 (2009).

  130. 130.

    , , , & Dynamics of active sensing and perceptual selection. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20, 172–176 (2010).

  131. 131.

    & Cortical oscillations and sensory predictions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 390–398 (2012).

  132. 132.

    et al. Correlating magnetoencephalography to stereo-electroencephalography in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. Brain 2016, aww215 (2016).

  133. 133.

    , , , & Preoperative evaluation using magnetoencephalography: experience in 382 epilepsy patients. Epilepsy Res. 124, 23–33 (2016).

  134. 134.

    et al. Relationship between M100 auditory evoked response and auditory radiation microstructure in 16p11.2 deletion and duplication carriers. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 37, 1178–1184 (2016).

  135. 135.

    & Amyloid-β-induced neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: from synapses toward neural networks. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 812–818 (2010).

  136. 136.

    & Magnetoencephalography in neuropsychiatry: ready for application? Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 23, 273–277 (2010).

  137. 137.

    et al. Exaggerated phase-amplitude coupling in the primary motor cortex in Parkinson disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4780–4785 (2013).

  138. 138.

    , , , & Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 879716 (2011).

  139. 139.

    , , & Forward field computation with OpenMEEG. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 923703 (2011).

  140. 140.

    et al. Attention drives synchronization of alpha and beta rhythms between right inferior frontal and primary sensory neocortex. J. Neurosci. 35, 2074–2082 (2015).

  141. 141.

    A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 474–480 (2005).

  142. 142.

    , , , & Dynamical relaying can yield zero time lag neuronal synchrony despite long conduction delays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17157–17162 (2008).

Download references


S.B. is supported by a Discovery Grant from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the NIH (2R01EB009048-05) and a Platform Support Grant from the Brain Canada Foundation.

Author information


  1. McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

    • Sylvain Baillet


  1. Search for Sylvain Baillet in:

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvain Baillet.

About this article

Publication history





Further reading