Abstract
Given concerns about the reproducibility of scientific findings, neuroimaging must define best practices for data analysis, results reporting, and algorithm and data sharing to promote transparency, reliability and collaboration. We describe insights from developing a set of recommendations on behalf of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping and identify barriers that impede these practices, including how the discipline must change to fully exploit the potential of the world's neuroimaging data.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
How to establish and maintain a multimodal animal research dataset using DataLad
Scientific Data Open Access 05 June 2023
-
Amygdala subdivisions exhibit aberrant whole-brain functional connectivity in relation to stress intolerance and psychotic symptoms in 22q11.2DS
Translational Psychiatry Open Access 04 May 2023
-
Emotional descriptions increase accidental harm punishment and its cortico-limbic signatures during moral judgment in autism
Scientific Reports Open Access 31 January 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Ioannidis, J.P.A. PLoS Med. 2, e124 (2005).
Open Science Collaboration. Science 349, aac4716 (2015).10.1126/science.aac4716
Anonymous. Nature 515, 7 (2014).10.1038/515007b
Nichols, T.E. et al. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/054262 (2016).
Peng, R.D. Science 334, 1226–1227 (2011).
Bennett, C.M. & Miller, M.B. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 13, 690–702 (2013).
Schnack, H.G. et al. Hum. Brain Mapp. 31, 1967–1982 (2010).
Noble, S. et al. Neuroimage 277, 88–100 (2017).
Boekel, W. et al. Cortex 66, 115–133 (2015).
Kriegeskorte, N., Simmons, W.K., Bellgowan, P.S.F. & Baker, C.I. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 535–540 (2009).
Poldrack, R.A. et al. Neuroimage 40, 409–414 (2008).
Brakewood, B. & Poldrack, R.A. Neuroimage 82, 671–676 (2013).
Waskom, M.L., Kumaran, D., Gordon, A.M., Rissman, J. & Wagner, A.D. J. Neurosci. 34, 10743–10755 (2014).
Whitaker, K.J. et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 9105–9110 (2016).
Pernet, C.R. et al. Neuroimage 119, 164–174 (2015).
Owens, B. Science 351, 329 (2016).
Mennes, M., Biswal, B.B., Castellanos, F.X. & Milham, M.P. Neuroimage 82, 683–691 (2013).
Gorgolewski, K.J. et al. Sci. Data 3, 160044 (2016).
Bulik-Sullivan, B.K. et al. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015).
Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Smith, S.M., Keltner, J.R., Wager, T.D. & Nichols, T.E. Neuroimage 45, 810–823 (2009).
Goble, C. IEEE Internet Comput. 18, 4–8 (2014).
Glasser, M.F. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1175–1187 (2016).
Abraham, A. et al. Neuroimage 147, 736–745 (2016).
ISO. Statistics - Vocabulary and Symbols. Part 2: Applied Statistics. ISO 3534–2 (Second ed.) (ISO, 2006).
Acknowledgements
T.E.N. is supported by the Wellcome Trust (100309/Z/12/Z) and NIH (R01 NS075066-01A1, R01 EB015611-01). B.T.T.Y. is supported by Singapore MOE Tier 2 (MOE2014-T2-2-016), NUS (DPRT/944/09/14, R185000271720), NMRC (CBRG14nov007) and the NUS YIA. S.B.E. is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, EI 816/4-1, LA 3071/3-1; EI 816/6-1), the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457), the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme 'Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain' and the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 604102). M.H. was supported by funds from the German federal state of Saxony-Anhalt and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), project: Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, and CRCNS BMBF/NSF (01GQ1411/1429999). N.K. was supported by the UK Medical Research Council and a European Research Council Starting Grant (261352). A.C.E., S.D. and T.G. are supported by the Irving Ludmer Family Foundation and the Ludmer Centre for Neuroinformatics and Mental Health. T.W. was supported by a ZonMw TOP grant (91211021). R.A.P. is supported by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. M.P.M. is a Phyllis Green and Randolph Cowen Scholar and is supported in part by the NIH (U01 MH099059; R01 AG047596). J.-B.P. is supported by the NIBIB (P41EB019936) and by NIH–National Institute on Drug Abuse (U24DA038653), as well as by the Laura and John Arnold Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 82 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nichols, T., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. et al. Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nat Neurosci 20, 299–303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500
This article is cited by
-
Amygdala subdivisions exhibit aberrant whole-brain functional connectivity in relation to stress intolerance and psychotic symptoms in 22q11.2DS
Translational Psychiatry (2023)
-
Emotional descriptions increase accidental harm punishment and its cortico-limbic signatures during moral judgment in autism
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
How to establish and maintain a multimodal animal research dataset using DataLad
Scientific Data (2023)
-
Confronting racially exclusionary practices in the acquisition and analyses of neuroimaging data
Nature Neuroscience (2023)
-
Editorial: What the New White House Rules on Equitable Access Mean for the Neurosciences
Neuroinformatics (2023)