Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Perceptual learning in autism: over-specificity and possible remedies


Inflexible behavior is a core characteristic of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but its underlying cause is unknown. Using a perceptual learning protocol, we observed initially efficient learning in ASD that was followed by anomalously poor learning when the location of the target was changed (over-specificity). Reducing stimulus repetition eliminated over-specificity. Our results indicate that inflexible behavior may be evident ubiquitously in ASD, even in sensory learning, but can be circumvented by specifically designed stimulation protocols.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: The texture discrimination task.
Figure 2: Over-specificity in ASD visual learning and its elimination following the dummy training.
Figure 3: RT analysis.


  1. 1

    Sumiyoshi, C. et al. Neurosci. Res. 69, 252–257 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Dawson, M., Mottron, L. & Gernsbacher, M.A. in Learning and Memory: a Comprehensive Reference (eds. Byrne, J. & Roediger, H.L.I.) 759–772 (Elsevier, Oxford, 2008).

  3. 3

    Sagi, D. Vision Res. 51, 1552–1566 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Harris, H., Gliksberg, M. & Sagi, D. Curr. Biol. 22, 1813–1817 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Karni, A. & Sagi, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 4966–4970 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Ahissar, M. & Hochstein, S. Nature 387, 401–406 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Greenlee, M.W. & Magnussen, S. Vision Res. 28, 1303–1310 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Brown, J., Aczel, B., Jiménez, L., Kaufman, S.B. & Grant, K.P. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove) 63, 1789–1812 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Roser, M.E., Aslin, R.N., McKenzie, R., Zahra, D. & Fiser, J. Neuropsychology 29, 163–172 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Petrov, A.A., Van Horn, N.M. & Ratcliff, R. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 490–497 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Liu, C.C. & Watanabe, T. Vision Res. 61, 107–114 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Qian, N. & Lipkin, R.M.A. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5, 77 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Webster, M.A. J. Vis. 11, 3 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Harris, H. & Sagi, D. Vision Res. 109, 77–86 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Lord, C. et al. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 30, 205–223 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Lord, C. et al. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 24, 659–685 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank R. Egan, A. Gupta and J. Geskin for their assistance in data collection, and D. Plaut and R. Malach for fruitful comments and discussions. This work was supported by grants from the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation and the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative. H.H. thanks the Azrieli Foundation for the award of an Azrieli Fellowship.

Author information




H.H., M.B. and D.S. designed the experiments. D.I., N.M. and Y.B. handled the clinical aspects. H.H. and M.B. collected the data. H.H., M.B. and D.S. analyzed the data. H.H., D.J.H., M.B. and D.S. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dov Sagi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Over-specificity with shorter stimulus durations.

Same format as Fig. 2a. Black curve: a group of ASD observers (n = 3) were trained with the standard training protocol, but with shorter stimulus presentation time of 10 ms (instead of 40 ms, used in Fig. 2). Gray curve: data from a group of non-matched control observers (see Methods, n = 24). Learning at location 1 of the ASD group matches the learning of the typical group. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA uncovered a significant effect of day (F(4,8) = 5.04, p = 0.02). Subsequent two-tailed pairwise comparison found significant learning following training (from day 1 to day 4, p = 0.015). Numerically, the initial performance level at the new location (day 5; 133 ± 16 ms) was worse than the trained performance level (day 4; 91 ± 18 ms), implying specificity of learning. However, the difference was not significant (p = 0.1). Also, the initial performance at the new location (day 5) was not significantly different from the initial performance level (day 1, p = 0.09), supporting specificity of learning. Typically, there are no performance relapses at location 2 (days 5-8, ‘standard’ group), but the ASD group showed a drop in performance on day 7 (125 ±11 ms) relative to day 6 (93 ± 4 ms), which was followed by a significant improvement on day 8 (p = 0.03). Notably, while in Fig. 2 there is ~30ms difference between the ASD and control groups’ initial performance level, here the initial thresholds of the ASD and non-ASD groups are closer. This implies that the stronger target duration time applied in Fig. 2 increased the difference between ASD and controls and may be explained by an increased sensitivity of the ASD observers to stimulus intensity.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harris, H., Israeli, D., Minshew, N. et al. Perceptual learning in autism: over-specificity and possible remedies. Nat Neurosci 18, 1574–1576 (2015).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing