Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Stress and the brain: individual variability and the inverted-U

It is a truism that the brain influences the body and that peripheral physiology influences the brain. Never is this clearer than during stress, where the subtlest emotions or the most abstract thoughts can initiate stress responses, with consequences throughout the body, and the endocrine transducers of stress alter cognition, affect and behavior. For a fervent materialist, few things in life bring more pleasure than contemplating the neurobiology of stress.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Conceptualization of the inverted-U in the context of the benefits and costs of stress.


  1. 1

    McEwen, B. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1353–1363 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Arnsten, A.F. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1376–1385 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Sorrells, S.F. et al. Neuron 64, 33–39 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Hodes, G. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1386–1393 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Tost, H. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1421–1431 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Chatterji, S. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1364–1375 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Holon, N. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1405–1412 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Calhoon, G. & Tye, K. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1394–1404 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hariri, A.R. & Holmes, A. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1347–1352 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Caspi, A. et al. Science 301, 386–389 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Diamond, D.M. et al. Hippocampus 2, 421–430 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    McEwen, B.S. & Sapolsky, R. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 5, 205–216 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Chrousos, G. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 5, 374–381 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Baldi, E. & Bucherelli, C. Nonlinearity Biol. Toxicol. Med. 3, 9–21 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Luksys, G. & Sandi, C. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 502–508 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Prager, E. & Johnson, L. Sci. Signal. 2, re5 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Roozendaal, B. Psychoneuroendocrinology 25, 213–238 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Sapolsky, R.M., Romero, L. & Munck, A. Endocr. Rev. 21, 55–89 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Fiorillo, C.D., Tobler, P. & Schultz, W. Science 299, 1898–1902 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Russo, S.J. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1475–1484 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M Sapolsky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sapolsky, R. Stress and the brain: individual variability and the inverted-U. Nat Neurosci 18, 1344–1346 (2015).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing