Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Resource
  • Published:

Coexpression networks identify brain region–specific enhancer RNAs in the human brain

Abstract

Despite major progress in identifying enhancer regions on a genome-wide scale, the majority of available data are limited to model organisms and human transformed cell lines. We have identified a robust set of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) expressed in the human brain and constructed networks assessing eRNA-gene coexpression interactions across human fetal brain and multiple adult brain regions. Our data identify brain region–specific eRNAs and show that enhancer regions expressing eRNAs are enriched for genetic variants associated with autism spectrum disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: rBEEs.
Figure 2: rBEEs are enriched for ASD-associated genetic variants.
Figure 3: Weighted gene coexpression network.
Figure 4: Brain region– and fetal brain–specific modules.
Figure 5: rBEE-gene coexpression interactions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Djebali, S. et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature 489, 101–108 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Thurman, R.E. et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489, 75–82 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanyal, A., Lajoie, B.R., Jain, G. & Dekker, J. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature 489, 109–113 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhu, J. et al. Genome-wide chromatin state transitions associated with developmental and environmental cues. Cell 152, 642–654 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. FANTOM Consortium and the RIKEN PMI and CLST (DGT) et al. A promoter-level mammalian expression atlas. Nature 507, 462–470 (2014).

  6. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467, 1061–1073 (2010).

  7. Ward, L.D. & Kellis, M. Interpreting noncoding genetic variation in complex traits and human disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1095–1106 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. McCarroll, S.A., Feng, G. & Hyman, S.E. Genome-scale neurogenetics: methodology and meaning. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 756–763 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gratten, J., Wray, N.R., Keller, M.C. & Visscher, P.M. Large-scale genomics unveils the genetic architecture of psychiatric disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 782–790 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Anney, R. et al. Individual common variants exert weak effects on the risk for autism spectrum disorders. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 4781–4792 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Anney, R. et al. A genome-wide scan for common alleles affecting risk for autism. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 4072–4082 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, K. et al. Common genetic variants on 5p14.1 associate with autism spectrum disorders. Nature 459, 528–533 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiss, L.A. et al. A genome-wide linkage and association scan reveals novel loci for autism. Nature 461, 802–808 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kerin, T. et al. A noncoding RNA antisense to moesin at 5p14.1 in autism. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 128ra40 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics. C. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature 511, 421–427 (2014).

  16. Barry, G. et al. The long non-coding RNA Gomafu is acutely regulated in response to neuronal activation and involved in schizophrenia-associated alternative splicing. Mol. Psychiatry 19, 486–494 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mattick, J.S. The central role of RNA in human development and cognition. FEBS Lett. 585, 1600–1616 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maston, G.A., Landt, S.G., Snyder, M. & Green, M.R. Characterization of enhancer function from genome-wide analyses. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 13, 29–57 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wenger, A.M. et al. The enhancer landscape during early neocortical development reveals patterns of dense regulation and co-option. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003728 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, T.K. et al. Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers. Nature 465, 182–187 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lam, M.T., Li, W., Rosenfeld, M.G. & Glass, C.K. Enhancer RNAs and regulated transcriptional programs. Trends Biochem. Sci. 39, 170–182 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersson, R. et al. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature 507, 455–461 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317–330 (2015).

  24. Core, L.J. et al. Analysis of nascent RNA identifies a unified architecture of initiation regions at mammalian promoters and enhancers. Nat. Genet. 46, 1311–1320 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, H. et al. Tissue-specific RNA expression marks distant-acting developmental enhancers. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004610 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Vermunt, M.W. et al. Large-scale identification of coregulated enhancer networks in the adult human brain. Cell Reports 9, 767–779 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet 381, 1371–1379 (2013).

  28. Berndt, S.I. et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 11 new loci for anthropometric traits and provides insights into genetic architecture. Nat. Genet. 45, 501–512 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yip, K.Y. et al. Classification of human genomic regions based on experimentally determined binding sites of more than 100 transcription-related factors. Genome Biol. 13, R48 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Abrahams, B.S. et al. SFARI Gene 2.0: a community-driven knowledgebase for the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Mol. Autism 4, 36 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. O'Roak, B. et al. Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations. Nature 485, 246–250 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. O'Roak, B.J. et al. Exome sequencing in sporadic autism spectrum disorders identifies severe de novo mutations. Nat. Genet. 43, 585–589 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Sanders, S.J. et al. De novo mutations revealed by whole-exome sequencing are strongly associated with autism. Nature 485, 237–241 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Iossifov, I. et al. De novo gene disruptions in children on the autistic spectrum. Neuron 74, 285–299 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Cristino, A.S. et al. Neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders represent an interconnected molecular system. Mol. Psychiatry 19, 294–301 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 559 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Langfelder, P., Zhang, B. & Horvath, S. Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R. Bioinformatics 24, 719–720 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, B. & Horvath, S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 4, 17 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hawrylycz, M.J. et al. An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 489, 391–399 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Colantuoni, C. et al. Temporal dynamics and genetic control of transcription in the human prefrontal cortex. Nature 478, 519–523 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kang, H.J. et al. Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature 478, 483–489 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Irimia, M. et al. A highly conserved program of neuronal microexons is misregulated in autistic brains. Cell 159, 1511–1523 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Uddin, M. et al. Brain-expressed exons under purifying selection are enriched for de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Genet. 46, 742–747 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Willsey, A.J. et al. Coexpression networks implicate human midfetal deep cortical projection neurons in the pathogenesis of autism. Cell 155, 997–1007 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kleinjan, D.A. et al. Long-range downstream enhancers are essential for Pax6 expression. Dev. Biol. 299, 563–581 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Mu, L. et al. SoxC transcription factors are required for neuronal differentiation in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. J. Neurosci. 32, 3067–3080 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Eisinger, B.E., Driessen, T.M., Zhao, C. & Gammie, S.C. Medial prefrontal cortex: genes linked to bipolar disorder and schizophrenia have altered expression in the highly social maternal phenotype. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 110 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Maekawa, M. et al. Polymorphism screening of brain-expressed FABP7, 5 and 3 genes and association studies in autism and schizophrenia in Japanese subjects. J. Hum. Genet. 55, 127–130 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Shimamoto, C. et al. Functional characterization of FABP3, 5 and 7 gene variants identified in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder and mouse behavioral studies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 6495–6511 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Core, L.J. et al. Analysis of nascent RNA identifies a unified architecture of initiation regions at mammalian promoters and enhancers. Nat. Genet. 46, 1311–1320 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Takahashi, H., Lassmann, T., Murata, M. & Carninci, P. 5′ end-centered expression profiling using cap-analysis gene expression and next-generation sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 7, 542–561 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Lassmann, T., Hayashizaki, Y. & Daub, C.O. TagDust—a program to eliminate artifacts from next generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 25, 2839–2840 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S.L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105–1111 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Quinlan, A.R. & Hall, I.M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Wang, K., Li, M. & Bucan, M. Pathway-based approaches for analysis of genome-wide association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 1278–1283 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Parikshak, N.N. et al. Integrative functional genomic analyses implicate specific molecular pathways and circuits in autism. Cell 155, 1008–1021 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Voineagu, I. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of autistic brain reveals convergent molecular pathology. Nature 474, 380–384 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Hochberg, Y. & Benjamini, Y. More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat. Med. 9, 811–818 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to P. Carninci and members of the RIKEN Omics Science Center for helpful discussions; the RIKEN GeNAS facility for library preparation and sequencing data preprocessing; S. Miyauchi for technical support in the initial stages of the project; K. Morris, I. Dawes and B. Ballard for critically reading the manuscript; and G. Sutton for editorial assistance. This work was supported by a NARSAD young investigator award, a JSPS Grant-in-Aid, an NHMRC project grant (APP1062510) and an ARC DECRA fellowship (DE140101033) to I.V.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

P.Y. analyzed the CAGE and RNA-seq data; I.V. carried out the coexpression network analysis; P.L. carried out the GWAS set enrichment analyses; A.G., A.A. and M.W.C.T. contributed to the data analysis. I.V. conceived the project and supervised all aspects of the project. I.V. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Voineagu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 RNA-seq and CAGE data.

Genomic location of mapped sequencing reads for (a) RNA-seq and (b) CAGE data. (c) Inter-sample Spearman rank correlation coefficients based on normalized expression values of GENCODE genes.

Supplementary Figure 2 Properties of robust brain expressed enhancers (rBEEs).

(a) rBEE length distribution. (b) Boxplots of brain rBEE and gene expression levels based on normalized FANTOM5 CAGE data. (c) eRNA expression enrichment in the brain. Heatmaps display scaled rBEE expression values (z-scores) in brain samples relative to non-brain samples based on normalized FANTOM5 CAGE data. (top) Intronic rBEE. Gene names are listed in blue. Genes implicated in ASD are listed in red. (bottom) Intergenic rBEE. The color bars above the heatmaps display the brain region, color-coded as shown in the legend. The schematic display of brain regions was generated using the Brain Explorer software http://mouse.brain-map.org/static/brainexplorer. Brain region abbreviations shown between square brackets correspond to regions included in the dataset but not shown on the schematic representation of the brain. S1-S32: sample IDs as listed in Supplementary Table 9. Note that for the analysis of eRNA expression enrichment in the brain sample S33, a technical replicate, was excluded (see Online Methods).

Supplementary Figure 3 Comparison between rBEE and previously published enhancer data sets.

(a) Barplots showing the number of enhancers and the number of SNPs overlapping enhancer regions plus 1 kb flanks. “Rcluster” denotes enhancer clusters from the Epigenomics ROADMAP, Kundaje et al. 2015. Top and middle panels: previously published enhancer sets (see Online Methods and Supplementary Table 6). Bottom panel: enhancer sets characterized in this study. (b) Venn diagram showing the number of overlapping enhancer regions across multiple datasets. The numbers shown between brackets represent the total number of enhancer regions in each dataset. The intersection areas represent the number of rBEE regions overlapping previous datasets. In the case of intersections between two previous datasets (eg. ENCODE and Vermunt et al.) the intersection area shows the number of enhancers from the smaller dataset overlapping enhancers in the larger dataset. Note that the diagram is not drawn to scale.

Supplementary Figure 4 GWAS enrichment scores for rBEE and ROADMAP brain clusters 28 and 42.

Each histogram displays the enrichment score obtained for an enhancer set and a GWAS dataset, as listed above the histogram. Enhancer set enrichment scores are shown as red vertical lines relative to a null distribution (blue histogram) obtained by 10,000 random permutations. ADD - attention deficit disorder, ASD - autism spectrum disorders, BPI - bipolar illness, MDD - major depressive disorder, SCZ - schizophrenia.

Supplementary Figure 5 Histogram of enhancer length (kb) on a log10 scale across all enhancer data sets used for GWAS enrichment analysis.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–5 (PDF 962 kb)

Supplementary Methods Checklist (PDF 384 kb)

Supplementary Table 1: Intergenic and intronic brain-expressed enhancers (BEEs)

This table lists intergenic and intronic BEEs (genomic coordinates, annotation and mean expression values using the CAGE and RNA-seq data generated in this study).For replicated BEEs, the table also includes data on their overlap with H3K4me1 and H3K27ac peaks from Zhu et al. 2013 and on brain region specific expression using FANTOM5 CAGE data (see Methods). Robust brain expressed enhancers (rBEE) are shown in bold.nSamplesCAGE: number of CAGE samples in which the BEE was expressed at >0.5 TPM. AvgCAGEExp: average BEE expression across the 4 CAGE samples (Frontal, Temporal, Occipital and Cerebellum). nSamplesRNASeq: number of RNA-seq samples in which the BEE was expressed at >0.5 TPM. AvgRNASeqExp: average BEE expression of the enhancer region across the 4 RNA-seq samples (Frontal, Temporal, Occipital and Cerebellum). H3K27ac, H3K4me1: whether the BEE overlaps a chromatin modification peak in inferior temporal gyrus, midfrontal gyrus or anterior caudate nucleus, based on data from Zhu et al 2013. enChr :whether the BEE overlaps either a H3K27ac or a H3K4me1 peak. Fetal brain, amygdala, caudate.nucleus, cerebellum, temporal, globus.pallidus, hippocampus, locus.coeruleus, medulla.oblongata, occipital, parietal, thalamus: these columns list the number of FANTOM5 samples from each category showing expression levels above 0.5 TPM. Nreg: the number of brain regions with expression values >0.5TPM in at least 2 distinct samples from the same region (for simplicity fetal brain was included as a category/region). (XLSX 183 kb)

Supplementary Table 2: RNA samples used for CAGE and RNA-seq

Source, Catalogue Number, Organism, Gender, Age (years), RNA concentration and RIN information for the RNA samples used for CAGE and RNA-seq data generated in this study (RIN: RNA integrity number measured by an Agilent Bioanalyzer). (XLSX 44 kb)

Supplementary Table 3: Summary of RNA-seq and CAGE data

Number of sequencing reads: total number of reads obtained for RNA-seq and CAGE respectively. Number of mapped reads (mapQ >10): number of sequencing reads mapped to the human genome, after filtering for a mapping quality score (mapQ) >10. Mapping rate: the ratio between the number of mapped reads with mapQ >10 and the total number of reads. (XLSX 42 kb)

Supplementary Table 4: Expression of robust brain-expressed enhancers (rBEEs) in primary cultured cells

Chr, start, end: hg19 genomic coordinates. Annot: annotation as intergenic or intronic. Astrocytes (TPM), Neurons (TPM): mean normalized expression values (tags per million) in cultured astrocytes and neurons respectively. (XLSX 58 kb)

Supplementary Table 5: Percentage of protein-encoding genes expressed in cultured cells at varying expression thresholds

"+","-": presence or absence of expression above the corresponding threshold in each type of cultured cells. (XLSX 38 kb)

Supplementary Table 6: List of published enhancer data sets used for GWAS enrichment analyses (XLSX 9 kb)

Supplementary Table 7: GWAS enrichment P values

Columns: GWAS datasets (ADD - attention deficit disorder, ASD - autism spectrum disorders, BPI - bipolar illness, MDD - major depressive disorder, SCZ – schizophrenia, BMI – body mass index), rows: enhancer sets (see Results section and Methods section for details on GWAS datasets and enhancer sets). ROADMAP_brain_clusters denotes the union of the 17 ROADMAP brain clusters. p-values were obtained by 1000 random permutations of SNP labels and were Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons for each GWAS dataset (see Methods for details). p-values < 0.05 are highlighted in red. (XLSX 10 kb)

Supplementary Table 8: Disease-associated genes

This table contains the list of genes implicated in neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders used for overrepresentation analyses. (XLSX 59 kb)

Supplementary Table 9: FANTOM5 samples used for WGCNA

List of FANTOM5 samples used for the co-expression network analysis. Library IDs and sample descriptions were obtained from: http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/data/ (XLSX 34 kb)

Supplementary Table 10: WGCNA kME values and module assignment

Module Label, Module Color: numeric and color labels assigned to co-expression modules. kME: module membership value (see Methods for details). pvalBH: Bonferroni and Hochberg corrected p-values for module membership. (XLSX 7812 kb)

Supplementary Table 11: WGCNA module eigengene values (XLSX 52 kb)

Supplementary Table 12: Coexpression module annotation

N rBEE, N Genes: number of rBEE and genes included in the module respectively. Annotation: brain region or developmental stage for which the co-expression module shows significantly higher module eigengene values (modules without significant p-values for any brain region or developmental stage are not included in the list).Module Eigengene Significance: Benjamini and Hochberg corrected Wilcoxon test p-values for module eigengene significance (see Methods). Enrichment p-value: Benjamini and Hochberg corrected hypergeometric test p-values for brain region marker enrichment (see Methods). The description of brain region marker lists is available at:http://www.inside r.org/packages/cran/WGCNA/docs/userListEnrichment. For each co-expression module only the most significantly enriched brain marker list, relevant to the module annotation, is shown. The region marker lists only include adult brain regions and thus there is no value reported for fetal brain modules. (XLSX 37 kb)

Supplementary Table 13: Coexpression network properties of robust brain expressed enhancers

This table lists the WGCNA module membership for rBEEs (rBEE module, rBEE kME) and their closest genes (closestGene Module, closestGene kME). TO: topological overlap value for the rBEE-closest gene pair. Chr, start, end: rBEE hg19 chromosomal coordinates. Annot: rBEE annotation as intergenic or intronic. closestGeneDist: the distance between rBEE and its closest gene, in number of base-pairs. (XLSX 69 kb)

Supplementary Table 14: Topological overlap values for intergenic rBEE and the top 20 coexpressed genes located in cis (i.e., within 500 MB)

TO: topological overlap values (see Methods). (XLSX 10 kb)

Supplementary Code: Supplementary data analysis code

These scripts contain annotated data analysis code for identifying rBEE regions, WGCNA network analysis and GWAS set enrichment analysis. See Readme.pdf for details on each script. (ZIP 165 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, P., Lin, P., Gokoolparsadh, A. et al. Coexpression networks identify brain region–specific enhancer RNAs in the human brain. Nat Neurosci 18, 1168–1174 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4063

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4063

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing