Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder predict creativity


We tested whether polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder would predict creativity. Higher scores were associated with artistic society membership or creative profession in both Icelandic (P = 5.2 × 10−6 and 3.8 × 10−6 for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder scores, respectively) and replication cohorts (P = 0.0021 and 0.00086). This could not be accounted for by increased relatedness between creative individuals and those with psychoses, indicating that creativity and psychosis share genetic roots.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder predict their corresponding disorder and creativity.
Figure 2: Nagelkerke's pseudo-R2 in Iceland for schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BD), artist (Art) and university degree (Univ) based on schizophrenia and bipolar disorder polygenic risk scores derived at the significance threshold of P < 0.2.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Post, F. Br. J. Psychiatry 165, 22–34 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Juda, A. Am. J. Psychiatry 106, 296–307 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Andreasen, N.C. Am. J. Psychiatry 144, 1288–1292 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Herbert, P.S. Jr. Psychiatr. Q. 33, 534–547 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jamison, K.R. Psychiatry 52, 125–134 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ludwig, A.M. Am. J. Psychother. 46, 330–356 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Karksson, J.L. Hereditas 66, 177–182 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kyaga, S. et al. Br. J. Psychiatry 199, 373–379 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kyaga, S. et al. J. Psychiatr. Res. 47, 83–90 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Owen, G.S., Cutting, J. & David, A.S. Br. J. Psychiatry 191, 453–454 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heilman, K.M., Nadeau, S.E. & Beversdorf, D.O. Neurocase 9, 369–379 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M. & Christoff, K. Neuroimage 59, 1783–1794 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stefansson, H. et al. Nature 505, 361–366 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Nature 511, 421–427 (2014).

  15. Psychiatric GWAS Consortium Bipolar Disorder Working Group. Nat. Genet. 43, 977–983 (2011).

  16. Barrantes-Vidal, N. J. Conscious. Stud. 11, 58–78 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karlsson, J.L. Hereditas 100, 83–86 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Styrkarsdottir, U. et al. Nature 497, 517–520 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Purcell, S. et al. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Carson, S.H., Peterson, J.B. & Higgins, D.M. Creat. Res. J. 17, 37–50 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van der Loos, M.J.H.M. et al. PLoS ONE 8, e60542 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Willemsen, G. et al. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 13, 231–245 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Willemsen, G. et al. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 16, 271–281 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nivard, M.G. et al. Genes Brain Behav. 13, 195–201 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, Y., Willer, C.J., Ding, J., Scheet, P. & Abecasis, G.R. Genet. Epidemiol. 34, 816–834 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Minică, C.C., Dolan, C.V., Kampert, M.M., Boomsma, D.I. & Vink, J.M. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 23, 388–394 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hofman, A. et al. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 28, 889–926 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lichtenstein, P. et al. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 9, 875–882 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Benjamin, D.J. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8026–8031 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoogendoorn, E.H. et al. Clin. Chem. 52, 104–111 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are grateful to the participants and thank the staff at the Krókháls recruitment center. We thank P. Arp, M. Jhamai, M. Moorhouse, M. Verkerk and S. Bervoets for their assistance in creating the GWAS database. The authors are very grateful to the participants and staff from the Rotterdam Study, participating general practitioners and the pharmacists. The Netherlands Twin Registry thanks all participants. The research leading to these results has received support from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreement 115008, resources of which are composed of European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) in-kind contributions and financial contributions from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and the European Union–funded FP7-People-2011-IAPP grant PsychDPC (GA 286213). This study presents independent research funded in part by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley, NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK National Health Service, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The Rotterdam Study was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research NWO Investments (175.010.2005.011, 911-03-012), the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (014-93-015; RIDE2) and the Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI)/Netherlands Consortium for Healthy Aging (NCHA) project 050-060-810. The Rotterdam Study is funded by the Erasmus Medical Center; Erasmus University, Rotterdam; the Netherlands Organization for the Health Research and Development (ZonMw); the Research Institute for Diseases in the Elderly (RIDE); the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science; the Ministry for Health, Welfare, and Sports; the European Commission (DG XII); and the Municipality of Rotterdam. Funding for the Netherlands Twin Registry was obtained from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and MagW/ZonMW, BBMRI-NL (184.021.007), the VU University Institute for Health and Care Research (EMGO+) and Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, the European Science Council (ERC) Genetics of Mental Illness (230374), Avera Institute for Human Genetics and US National Institute of Mental Health (1RC2MH089951-01 and 1RC2 MH089995). The Swedish Twin Registry was financially supported by the Ragnar Söderberg Foundation (E9/11), the Swedish Research Council (421-2013-1061), the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius Foundation (P2012-0002:1), the Sven and Dagmar Salén Foundation, the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation (M11-0451:1) and the Karolinska Institutet. Some of the statistical analyses were carried out on the Genetic Cluster Computer (, which is financially supported by the Netherlands Scientific Organization (NWO 480-05-003 PI: Posthuma) along with a supplement from the Dutch Brain Foundation and the VU University Amsterdam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



R.A.P., S.S., D.G., G.B., H.S. and K.S. were involved in study design. G.B., H.S., E.S., S.S., K.S., D.C., P.K.E.M., F.U., C.A.R., H.T., A. Hofman, F.J.A.v.R. and G.W. were involved in cohort ascertainment, phenotypic characterization and recruitment. R.A.P., S.S., G.B., H.S., G.B.W., T.E.T., A.I., M.J., T.E.G. and J.J.H. were involved in informatics and data management. R.A.P., S.S., A.K., D.G., C.A.R., A.A. and M.M.N. carried out statistical analysis. D.C., D.J.B., M.J., A. Helgason, L.A.K., P.K., D.I.B., H.S. and K.S. were involved in planning and supervising the study. R.A.P., S.S., G.B., E.S., D.G., H.S. and K.S. wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kari Stefansson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.S., H.S., G.B., G.B.W., D.G., A.I., A. Helgason, A.K., T.E.T. and K.S. are employees of deCODE Genetics/Amgen.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Power, R., Steinberg, S., Bjornsdottir, G. et al. Polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder predict creativity. Nat Neurosci 18, 953–955 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing