Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Divide and conquer: strategic decision areas

Strategic decisions can prove difficult to study. The board game shogi is used to investigate the functional neuroanatomy of strategic decisions, revealing different brain areas from those engaged by other forms of choice.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Many routes to a decision.

monkeybusinessimages/Matthieu_Photoglosky/Jack Wackerhausen/Thinkstock


  1. 1

    Wan, X., Cheng, K. & Tanaka, K. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 752–759 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    FitzGerald, T.H., Seymour, B. & Dolan, R.J. J. Neurosci. 29, 8388–8395 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Hare, T.A., Schultz, W., Camerer, C.F., O'Doherty, J.P. & Rangel, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18120–18125 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Behrens, T.E., Hunt, L.T. & Rushworth, M.F. Science 324, 1160–1164 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Nicolle, A. et al. Neuron 75, 1114–1121 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Kolling, N., Behrens, T.E., Mars, R.B. & Rushworth, M.F. Science 336, 95–98 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Hayden, B.Y., Pearson, J.M. & Platt, M.L. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 933–939 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    McCoy, A.N. & Platt, M.L. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1220–1227 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Amemori, K.-i. & Graybiel, A.M. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 776–785 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Lee, S.W., Shimojo, S. & O'Doherty, J.P. Neuron 81, 687–699 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Hyafil, A., Summerfield, C. & Koechlin, E. J. Neurosci. 29, 5135–5142 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Cisek, P. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 927–936 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Hunt, L.T., Dolan, R.J. & Behrens, T.E. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1613–1622 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Kolling, N., Wittmann, M. & Rushworth, M.F. Neuron 81, 1190–1202 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D.G. Psychol. Rev. 103, 650–669 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nils Kolling or Laurence T Hunt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolling, N., Hunt, L. Divide and conquer: strategic decision areas. Nat Neurosci 18, 616–618 (2015).

Download citation


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing