Recording from neural networks at the resolution of action potentials is critical for understanding how information is processed in the brain. Here, we address this challenge by developing an organic material–based, ultraconformable, biocompatible and scalable neural interface array (the ‘NeuroGrid’) that can record both local field potentials(LFPs) and action potentials from superficial cortical neurons without penetrating the brain surface. Spikes with features of interneurons and pyramidal cells were simultaneously acquired by multiple neighboring electrodes of the NeuroGrid, allowing for the isolation of putative single neurons in rats. Spiking activity demonstrated consistent phase modulation by ongoing brain oscillations and was stable in recordings exceeding 1 week's duration. We also recorded LFP-modulated spiking activity intraoperatively in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. The NeuroGrid constitutes an effective method for large-scale, stable recording of neuronal spikes in concert with local population synaptic activity, enhancing comprehension of neural processes across spatiotemporal scales and potentially facilitating diagnosis and therapy for brain disorders.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $17.42 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Buzsáki, G. Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 446–451 (2004).
Alivisatos, A.P. et al. The brain activity map. Science 339, 1284–1285 (2013).
Carandini, M. From circuits to behavior: a bridge too far? Nat. Neurosci. 15, 507–509 (2012).
Adrian, E.D. & Moruzzi, G. Impulses in the pyramidal tract. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 97, 153–199 (1939).
Wilson, M.A. & McNaughton, B.L. Dynamics of the hippocampal ensemble code for space. Science 261, 1055–1058 (1993).
Wise, K.D. & Najafi, K. Microfabrication techniques for integrated sensors and microsystems. Science 254, 1335–1342 (1991).
Buzsáki, G. & Draguhn, A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 304, 1926–1929 (2004).
Campbell, P.K., Jones, K.E., Huber, R.J., Horch, K.W. & Normann, R.a. A silicon-based, three-dimensional neural interface: manufacturing processes for an intracortical electrode array. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 38, 758–768 (1991).
Polikov, V.S., Tresco, P.A. & Reichert, W.M. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J. Neurosci. Methods 148, 1–18 (2005).
Gold, C., Henze, D.A., Koch, C. & Buzsáki, G. On the origin of the extracellular action potential waveform: a modeling study. J. Neurophysiol. 95, 3113–3128 (2006).
Buzsáki, G. Somadendritic backpropagation of action potentials in cortical pyramidal cells of the awake rat. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 1587–1591 (1998).
Harris, K.D. et al. Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 401–414 (2000).
Engel, A.K., Fries, P. & Singer, W. Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 704–716 (2001).
Viventi, J. et al. Flexible, foldable, actively multiplexed, high-density electrode array for mapping brain activity in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1599–1605 (2011).
Stavrinidou, E. et al. Direct measurement of ion mobility in a conducting polymer. Adv. Mater. 25, 4488–4493 (2013).
Owens, R.M. & Malliaras, G.G. Organic electronics at the interface with biology. MRS Bull. 35, 449–456 (2010).
Khodagholy, D. et al. Highly conformable conducting polymer electrodes for in vivo recordings. Adv. Mater. 23, 1–5 10.1002/adma.201102378 (2011).
Khodagholy, D. et al. In vivo recordings of brain activity using organic transistors. Nat. Commun. 4, 1575 (2013).
Einevoll, G.T. et al. Laminar population analysis: estimating firing rates and evoked synaptic activity from multielectrode recordings in rat barrel cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 97, 2174–2190 (2007).
Ranck, J.B. Studies on single neurons and septum in dorsal hippocampal in unrestrained rats. Exp. Neurol. 41, 461–531 (1973).
Stark, E. et al. Inhibition-induced theta resonance in cortical circuits. Neuron 80, 1263–1276 (2013).
Sirota, A. et al. Entrainment of neocortical neurons and gamma oscillations by the hippocampal theta rhythm. Neuron 60, 683–697 (2008).
Robbins, A.A., Fox, S.E., Holmes, G.L., Scott, R.C. & Barry, J.M. Short duration waveforms recorded extracellularly from freely moving rats are representative of axonal activity. Front. Neural Circuits 7, 181 (2013).
Barthó, P. et al. Characterization of neocortical principal cells and interneurons by network interactions and extracellular features. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 600–608 (2004).
Steriade, M., McCormick, D.A. & Sejnowski, T.J. Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. Science 262, 679–685 (1993).
Nir, Y. et al. Regional slow waves and spindles in human sleep. Neuron 70, 153–169 (2011).
Contreras, D. et al. Intracellular and computational characterization of the intracortical inhibitory control of synchronized thalamic inputs in vivo. J. Neurophysiol. 78, 335–350 (1997).
Csicsvari, J., Hirase, H., Czurkó, A., Mamiya, A. & Buzsáki, G. Fast network oscillations in the hippocampal CA1 region of the behaving rat. J. Neurosci. 19, RC20 (1999).
Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K. & Chang, E.F. Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science 343, 1006–1010 (2014).
Crone, N.E., Sinai, A. & Korzeniewska, A. High-frequency gamma oscillations and human brain mapping with electrocorticography. Prog. Brain Res. 159, 275–295 (2006).
Waziri, A., Schevon, C. & Cappell, J. Initial surgical experience with a dense cortical microarray in epileptic patients undergoing craniotomy for subdural electrode implantation. Neurosurgery 64, 540–545 (2009).
Rubehn, B., Bosman, C., Oostenveld, R., Fries, P. & Stieglitz, T. A MEMS-based flexible multichannel ECoG-electrode array. J. Neural Eng. 6, 036003 (2009).
Kim, D.-H. et al. Dissolvable films of silk fibroin for ultrathin conformal bio-integrated electronics. Nat. Mater. 9, 511–517 (2010).
Besson, P., Andermann, F., Dubeau, F. & Bernasconi, A. Small focal cortical dysplasia lesions are located at the bottom of a deep sulcus. Brain 131, 3246–3255 (2008).
Berggren, M. & Richter-Dahlfors, A. Organic bioelectronics. Adv. Mater. 19, 3201–3213 (2007).
Rivnay, J., Owens, R.M. & Malliaras, G.G. The rise of organic bioelectronics. Chem. Mater. 26, 679–685 (2014).
Abidian, M.R. & Martin, D.C. Experimental and theoretical characterization of implantable neural microelectrodes modified with conducting polymer nanotubes. Biomaterials 29, 1273–1283 (2008).
Peterka, D.S., Takahashi, H. & Yuste, R. Imaging voltage in neurons. Neuron 69, 9–21 (2011).
Chichilnisky, E.J. & Baylor, D.a. Receptive-field microstructure of blue-yellow ganglion cells in primate retina. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 889–893 (1999).
Meister, M., Pine, J. & Baylor, D.a. Multi-neuronal signals from the retina: acquisition and analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 51, 95–106 (1994).
Marre, O. et al. Mapping a complete neural population in the retina. J. Neurosci. 32, 14859–14873 (2012).
Lee, S., Kruglikov, I., Huang, Z.J., Fishell, G. & Rudy, B. A disinhibitory circuit mediates motor integration in the somatosensory cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1662–1670 (2013).
Thesen, T. et al. Sequential then interactive processing of letters and words in the left fusiform gyrus. Nat. Commun. 3, 1284 (2012).
Bragin, A., Engel, J., Wilson, C.L., Fried, I. & Mathern, G.W. Hippocampal and entorhinal cortex high-frequency oscillations (100–500 Hz) in human epileptic brain and in kainic acid–treated rats with chronic seizures. Epilepsia 40, 127–137 (1999).
Jacobs, J. & Kahana, M.J. Neural representations of individual stimuli in humans revealed by gamma-band electrocorticographic activity. J. Neurosci. 29, 10203–10214 (2009).
Ray, S. & Maunsell, J.H.R. Different origins of gamma rhythm and high-gamma activity in macaque visual cortex. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000610 (2011).
Hatsopoulos, N.G. & Donoghue, J. The science of neural interface systems. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 32, 249–266 (2009).
This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health Grants (NS074015, MH54671, MH102840), the National Science Foundation, the Mathers Foundation and the James S. McDonnell Foundation. The device fabrication was performed at Microelectronic Centre of Provence and the Cornell NanoScale Facility (CNF), a member of the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network, which is supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant ECCS-0335765). D.K. is supported through the Simons Foundation (junior fellow). J.G. is supported by the Pediatric Scientist Development Program through a grant from the March of Dimes Foundation. We thank M. Sessolo (University of Valencia), J. Rivnay and M. Ferro (Ecole des Mines), and A. Peyrache and G. Girardeau (NYU Langone Medical Center) for fruitful discussion. We thank M. Skvarla, R. Ilic and M. Metzler from the CNF for their technical support during device fabrication. We thank H. McKellar and A. Boomhaur for managing the institutional review board (IRB) protocol of intraoperative epilepsy patient recordings.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Integrated supplementary information
a) Optical micrograph of a 256-channel NeuroGrid (scale = 1 mm). Optical micrograph of PEDOT:PSS-based recording sites (inset; scale = 10 μm).b) Optical micrograph of 64-channel NeuroGrid conforming to a 100 μm diameter cylinder (scale = 200 μm).c) Current measurement by a single NeuroGrid electrode site in response to 0.5 V stimulation at 50 mHz is stable for over 9 hours. At shorter time scales (upper plots) waveforms are similar between widely separated time points (red boxes).d) Comparison of electrode impedance over a broad range of frequencies between the NeuroGrid (filled circles) and conventional Au-based electrodes (open circles). Impedance of NeuroGrid electrodes is consistent between different arrays (inset; blue circles) and more than an order of magnitude less than conventional implantable silicon probes (inset; red circles).
a) Comparison of signal power over physiologically relevant frequencies for NeuroGrid (blue lines) and silicon probe (red lines) during REM sleep (upper traces) and post-mortem (lower traces).b) SNR of surface recording by the NeuroGrid and depth recording by a silicon probe.
a) Placement of a 64-channel NeuroGrid on rat somatosensory cortex (expanded version of Fig. 1b).b) Spike-triggered averages of multiple individual units recorded at each recording site overlaid on NeuroGrid geometry. Recording sites that were located over major blood vessels, as demonstrated in corresponding anatomical photograph (scale = 300 μm) of NeuroGrid placement, did not resolve any spikes (scale = 3 ms by 50 μV).c) Spatial extent and morphology of a sample subset of multiple individual trigger-averaged extracellular action potentials from (b) are consistent over 10 days of recording (scale = 3 ms by 50 μV).
Supplementary Figure 4 Extracellular action potential waveforms and recording stability in hippocampus.
a) Simultaneous implantation of a 64-channel NeuroGrid and a 4-shank silicon probe in rat hippocampus (scale = 300 μm).b) Spatial extent and morphology of a sample subset of multiple individual trigger-averaged extracellular action potentials on different NeuroGrid recording sites are consistent over 10 days of recording (scale = 3 ms, 100 μV).
Supplementary Figure 5 Simultaneous recording of ripples and units by the NeuroGrid (green) and a silicon probe (blue) in the hippocampus.
a) Raster plot of spike firing during ripples as recorded by the NeuroGrid on the hippocampal surface and a silicon probe inserted into CA1, immediately next to the NeuroGrid.b) Raw LFP showing a ripple recorded on multiple NeuroGrid electrodes and simultaneously captured by multiple sites of a linear silicon probe in CA1 (scale = 100 ms by 500 μV). Recording sites of the silicon probe are separated by 20 µm in the vertical direction. The tip of the probe is in the pyramidal layer.c) Band-pass filtered traces at ripple frequency (100 – 250 Hz) of the NeuroGrid and silicon probe recordings above (scale = 100 ms, 200 μV).d) High-pass filtered (fc = 500 Hz) time traces of the NeuroGrid and silicon probe LFP recordings above (scale = 100 ms, 100 μV).e) Autocorrelograms (in color) of a putative single unit’s spiking activity as recorded simultaneously by the NeuroGrid and a silicon probe. Cross-correlation (black) of spiking activity demonstrates co-occurrence of recorded spikes (bin size = 1 ms). Note the similar form of the autocorrelograms, though fewer spikes are recorded with the NeuroGrid.
Supplementary Figures 1–5 and Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 2629 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Khodagholy, D., Gelinas, J., Thesen, T. et al. NeuroGrid: recording action potentials from the surface of the brain. Nat Neurosci 18, 310–315 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3905
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids (2021)
Nano Research (2020)
Smart materials for smart healthcare– moving from sensors and actuators to self-sustained nanoenergy nanosystems
Smart Materials in Medicine (2020)
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (2020)