Abstract
Little is known about the underlying neural mechanism of deep brain stimulation (DBS). We found that DBS targeted at the nucleus accumbens (NAc) normalized NAc activity, reduced excessive connectivity between the NAc and prefrontal cortex, and decreased frontal low-frequency oscillations during symptom provocation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Our findings suggest that DBS is able to reduce maladaptive activity and connectivity of the stimulated region.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$79.00
only $6.58 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.



Change history
18 July 2014
Reanalysis accounting for electrode artifacts. The newly published Supplementary Figure 6 depicts normalized EPI scans from two DBS-implanted subjects illustrating that the nucleus accumbens ROI (red) and the region of signal dropout around the electrode are not overlapping. Nevertheless, we reanalyzed our data to further rule out the possibility that our results were affected by signal measured from the dropout region. We re-analyzed the data by removing the parts of the ROI that would extend into the electrode dropout region based on the normalized but unsmoothed functional images instead of T1-weighted scans. We then extracted the ROI time series from these unsmoothed images and correlated these with the smoothed remaining brain. Results from this reanalysis (Supplementary Table 6 and Supplementary Fig. 7) are similar to those of the first analysis—that is, DBS-induced decrease in functional connectivity between the NAc and mPFC/lPFC—confirming that our results are unlikely to reflect false positives related to electrode artifacts.
References
Kringelbach, M.L., Green, A.L. & Aziz, T.Z. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 5, 8 (2011).
Denys, D. et al. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 67, 1061–1068 (2010).
Figee, M. et al. Biol. Psychiatry 69, 867–874 (2011).
Harrison, B.J. et al. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 66, 1189–1200 (2009).
Menzies, L. et al. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 32, 525–549 (2008).
Pogarell, O. et al. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 62, 87–92 (2006).
Knyazev, G.G. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 677–695 (2012).
Van Laere, K. et al. J. Nucl. Med. 47, 740–747 (2006).
Bewernick, B.H. et al. Biol. Psychiatry 67, 110–116 (2010).
McIntyre, C.C. & Hahn, P.J. Neurobiol. Dis. 38, 329–337 (2010).
Lehman, J.F., Greenberg, B.D., McIntyre, C.C., Rasmussen, S.A. & Haber, S.N. J. Neurosci. 31, 10392–10402 (2011).
Haber, S.N., Kim, K.S., Mailly, P. & Calzavara, R. J. Neurosci. 26, 8368–8376 (2006).
Goodman, W.K. et al. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 46, 1006–1011 (1989).
Hamilton J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 23, 56–62 (1960).
Sheehan, D.V. et al. J. Clin. Psychiatry 59, 22–33 (1998).
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. et al. Neuroimage 15, 273–289 (2002).
Di Martino, A. et al. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2735–2747 (2008).
Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M. & Cuthbert, B.N. International affective picture system IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. (University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 2008).
Delorme, A. et al. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. doi:10.1155/2011/130714 (5 May 2011).
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E. & Schoffelen, J.M. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. doi:10.1155/2011/156869 (23 December 2010).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grant 916.66.095 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research ZON-MW VENI program. A.M. was supported from a VENI grant 016.115.196 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.D. and M.F. conceived the study. M.F., R.S., C.-E.V.-A., A.N. and M.V. designed experiments. M.F., J.L. and B.d.K. conducted functional neuroimaging. M.F., J.L., M.V. and L.D. carried out neuroimaging data processing and analysis. R.S., N.L. and C.-E.V.-A. conducted EEG recording, data processing and analysis. N.V., P.d.K., M.M. and P.O. acquired behavioral data. P.v.d.M. and P.R.S. performed neurosurgery and edited the manuscript. M.F., J.L. and R.S. prepared the manuscript. D.D., W.v.d.B., G.v.W., A.N., P.v.d.M., P.R.S. and A.M. edited the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
P.R.S. is an independent consultant for Medtronic Inc on educational matters and received travel grants from the company.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figures 1–7 and Supplementary Tables 1–6 (PDF 3103 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Figee, M., Luigjes, J., Smolders, R. et al. Deep brain stimulation restores frontostriatal network activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nat Neurosci 16, 386–387 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3344
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3344
This article is cited by
-
Common and differential connectivity profiles of deep brain stimulation and capsulotomy in refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder
Molecular Psychiatry (2022)
-
The prefrontal cortex and neurosurgical treatment for intractable OCD
Neuropsychopharmacology (2022)
-
Dorsal striatal dopamine induces fronto-cortical hypoactivity and attenuates anxiety and compulsive behaviors in rats
Neuropsychopharmacology (2022)
-
Deep Brain Stimulation for Depression
Neurotherapeutics (2022)
-
Toward a neurocircuit-based taxonomy to guide treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder
Molecular Psychiatry (2021)