Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

An axis of good and awful in odor reception

Nature Neuroscience volume 14, pages 1360–1362 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Patchy variation in odor-evoked electrical activity in the human olfactory epithelium is found to correlate with stimulus pleasantness. This finding depends on a new technique for recording directly from awake humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Two simple odor antipodes, goodness and badness, construct a hedonic olfactory axis in the olfactory epithelium.

Katie Vicari

References

  1. Khan, R.M. et al. J. Neurosci. 27, 10015–10023 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lapid, H. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1455–1461 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buck, L.B. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 517–544 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ressler, K.J., Sullivan, S.L. & Buck, L.B. Cell 73, 597–609 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Buck, L. & Axel, R. Cell 65, 175–187 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liberles, S.D. & Buck, L.B. Nature 442, 645–650 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yarmolinsky, D.A., Zuker, C.S. & Ryba, N.J. Cell 139, 234–244 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, D.V. & Margolskee, R.F. Sci. Am. 284, 32–39 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Purves, D. et al. Neuroscience, 4th Edn. 384–387 (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2008).

  10. Boughter, J.D. Jr., Pumplin, D.W., Yu, C., Christy, R.C. & Smith, D.V. J. Neurosci. 17, 2852–2858 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goyert, H.F., Frank, M.E., Gent, J.F. & Hettinger, T.P. Brain Res. Bull. 72, 1–9 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Frank, M.E., Goyert, H.F. & Hettinger, T.P. Chem. Senses 35, 777–787 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marion E. Frank and Thomas P. Hettinger are at the University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.,

    Marion E Frank & Thomas P Hettinger

Authors
  1. Marion E Frank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas P Hettinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion E Frank.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frank, M., Hettinger, T. An axis of good and awful in odor reception. Nat Neurosci 14, 1360–1362 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2967

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2967

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing