Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Transitions in infant learning are modulated by dopamine in the amygdala

Abstract

Behavioral transitions characterize development. Young infant rats paradoxically prefer odors that are paired with shock, but older pups learn aversions. This transition is amygdala and corticosterone dependent. Using microarrays and microdialysis, we found downregulated dopaminergic presynaptic function in the amygdala with preference learning. Corticosterone-injected 8-d-old pups and untreated 12-d-old pups learned aversions and had dopaminergic upregulation in the amygdala. Dopamine injection into the amygdala changed preferences to aversions, whereas dopamine antagonism reinstated preference learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Role of shock on corticosterone and behavior.
Figure 2: Dopamine efflux and manipulation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Maestripieri, D., Lindell, S.G., Ayala, A., Gold, P.W. & Higley, J.D. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 29, 51–57 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sullivan, R.M., Moriceau, S., Raineki, C. & Roth, T.L. in Cognitive Neuroscience IV (ed. M. Gazzaniga) 889–904 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meaney, M.J., Sapolsky, R.M. & McEwen, B.S. Brain Res. 350, 159–164 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sullivan, R.M., Landers, M., Yeaman, B. & Wilson, D.A. Nature 407, 38–39 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moriceau, S. & Sullivan, R.M. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1004–1006 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moriceau, S., Wilson, D.A., Levine, S. & Sullivan, R.M. J. Neurosci. 26, 6737–6748 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Breitling, R., Armengaud, P., Amtmann, A. & Herzyk, P. FEBS Lett. 573, 83–92 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Galter, D., Buervenich, S., Carmine, A., Anvret, M. & Olson, L. Neurobiol. Dis. 14, 637–647 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenkranz, J.A. & Grace, A.A. Nature 417, 282–287 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bissière, S., Humeau, Y. & Luthi, A. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 587–592 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pollak, D.D. et al. Neuron 60, 149–161 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Härfstrand, A. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 9779–9783 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Overton, P.G., Tong, Z.Y., Brain, P.F. & Clark, D. Brain Res. 737, 146–154 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Herry, C. et al. Nature 454, 600–606 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Levine, S., Dent, G. & De Kloet, E.R. in Encyclopedia of Stress, Vol. 3 (ed. G. Fink) 518–526 (Academic Press, New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Levita and the anonymous reviewers for helpful criticisms. This work was supported by grants NIH-NICHD-HD33402, NSF-IOB-0544406, NIH-NIDCD-DC009910 and the Leon Levy Foundation to R.M.S. and NIH-NIDA DA00325 and NIH-NIMH MH080603 to G.A.B.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.A.B. helped conceptualize and design the project, designed the microarray experiments, helped analyze the array and PCR data, and wrote the manuscript. S.M. helped conduct the behavioral, pharmacological studies, analyzed the data, and contributed to writing the manuscript. K.S. conducted the high-performance liquid chromatography studies. K.M. helped collect data for many of the experiments. P.G. analyzed the microarray and PCR data. S.W. conducted the microarray and PCR studies and carried out preliminary data analysis. R.M.S. helped conceptualize and design the project, supervised the behavioral, pharmacological, and dialysis studies, and helped write the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gordon A Barr or Regina M Sullivan.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–4, Supplementary Tables 1–6 and Supplementary Methods (PDF 1162 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barr, G., Moriceau, S., Shionoya, K. et al. Transitions in infant learning are modulated by dopamine in the amygdala. Nat Neurosci 12, 1367–1369 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2403

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2403

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing