Enhancing the contrast sensitivity function through action video game training

Article metrics

Abstract

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF) is routinely assessed in clinical evaluation of vision and is the primary limiting factor in how well one sees. CSF improvements are typically brought about by correction of the optics of the eye with eyeglasses, contact lenses or surgery. We found that the very act of action video game playing also enhanced contrast sensitivity, providing a complementary route to eyesight improvement.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Improved CSF as a result of action video game experience.
Figure 2: Improved critical duration as a result of action video game experience.

References

  1. 1

    Campbell, F.W. Behav. Brain Res. 10, 87–97 (1983).

  2. 2

    Sekuler, R. & Sekuler, A.B. Visual perception and cognition. in Oxford Textbook of Geriatric Medicine (eds. Evans, J.G., Williams, T.F., Beattie, B.L., Michel, J.-P. & Wilcock, G.K.) 874–880 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2000).

  3. 3

    Weale, R.A. The Senescence of Human Vision (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992).

  4. 4

    Fahle, M. & Poggio, T. Perceptual Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 2002).

  5. 5

    Yu, C., Klein, S.A. & Levi, D.M. J. Vis. 4, 169–182 (2004).

  6. 6

    Adini, Y., Sagi, D. & Tsodyks, M Nature 415, 790–793 (2002).

  7. 7

    Maehara, G. & Goryo, K. Percept. Psychophys. 69, 1009–1021 (2007).

  8. 8

    Sowden, P.T., Davies, I.R. & Roling, P. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 379–390 (2000).

  9. 9

    Sowden, P.T., Rose, D. & Davies, I.R. Vision Res. 42, 1249–1258 (2002).

  10. 10

    Mayer, M.J. Vision Res. 23, 547–550 (1983).

  11. 11

    Polat, U. & Sagi, D. Vision Res. 33, 993–999 (1993).

  12. 12

    Fiser, J., Bex, P.J. & Makous, W. Vision Res. 43, 2637–2648 (2003).

  13. 13

    Patching, G.R. & Jordan, T.R. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 46, 2219–2224 (2005).

  14. 14

    Gilbert, C.D., Sigman, M. & Crist, R.E. Neuron 31, 681–697 (2001).

  15. 15

    Achtman, R.L., Green, C.S. & Bavelier, D. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 26, 435–446 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C.S. Green for his invaluable help and advice throughout this project, and A. Anderson, S. Bailey, A. Katz, M. Maciejewski, A. States, P. Santos and B. Hubert-Wallander for their help in running the training studies. This work was supported in part by grants from the US National Institutes of Health (EY016880), the James S. McDonnell Foundation and the Office of Naval Research to D.B. and the Israel Science Foundation to U.P.

Author information

Correspondence to Daphne Bavelier.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Notes 1–6 (PDF 190 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading