Article | Published:

Widespread formation of alternative 3′ UTR isoforms via transcription termination in archaea

Nature Microbiology volume 1, Article number: 16143 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Transcription termination sets the 3′ end boundaries of RNAs and plays key roles in gene regulation. Although termination has been well studied in bacteria, the signals that mediate termination in archaea remain poorly understood. Here, we applied term-seq to comprehensively map RNA 3′ termini, with single-base precision, in two phylogenetically distant archaea: Methanosarcina mazei and Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. Comparison of RNA 3′ ends across hundreds of genes revealed the sequence composition of transcriptional terminators in each organism, highlighting both common and divergent characteristics between the different archaeal phyla. We find that, in contrast to bacteria, a considerable portion of archaeal genes are controlled by multiple consecutive terminators, generating several alternative 3′ untranslated region isoforms for >30% of the genes. These alternative isoforms often present marked length differences, implying that archaea can employ regulation via alternative 3′ untranslated regions, similar to eukaryotes. Although most of the terminators are intergenic, we discover numerous cases in which termination of one gene occurs within the coding region of a downstream gene, implying that leaky termination may tune inter-transcript stoichiometry in multi-gene operons. These results provide the first high-throughput maps of transcriptional terminators in archaea and point to an evolutionary path linking bacterial and eukaryal non-coding regulatory strategies.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Bacterial transcription terminators: the RNA 3′-end chronicles. J. Mol. Biol. 412, 793–813 (2011).

  2. 2.

    & Transcription termination and the control of the transcriptome: why, where and how to stop. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 190–202 (2015).

  3. 3.

    et al. Rho and NusG suppress pervasive antisense transcription in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 26, 2621–2633 (2012).

  4. 4.

    & Unexpected versatility in bacterial riboswitches. Trends Genet. 31, 150–156 (2015).

  5. 5.

    & The distributions, mechanisms, and structures of metabolite-binding riboswitches. Genome Biol. 8, R239 (2007).

  6. 6.

    & Termination and antitermination: RNA polymerase runs a stop sign. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 319–329 (2011).

  7. 7.

    & The mechanism of intrinsic transcription termination. Mol. Cell 3, 495–504 (1999).

  8. 8.

    & Archaeal RNA polymerase is sensitive to intrinsic termination directed by transcribed and remote sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 355, 196–210 (2006).

  9. 9.

    , , & Experimental characterization of cis-acting elements important for translation and transcription in halophilic archaea. PLoS Genet. 3, e229 (2007).

  10. 10.

    & A polymerase III-like reinitiation mechanism is operating in regulation of histone expression in archaea. Mol. Microbiol. 67, 958–970 (2008).

  11. 11.

    , & Molecular mechanisms of RNA polymerase-the F/E (RPB4/7) complex is required for high processivity in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 585–596 (2009).

  12. 12.

    , , & Archaeal intrinsic transcription termination in vivo. J. Bacteriol. 191, 7102–7108 (2009).

  13. 13.

    , & Transcription termination in the archaebacterium Sulfolobus: signal structures and linkage to transcription initiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 2445–2459 (1988).

  14. 14.

    et al. Term-seq reveals abundant ribo-regulation of antibiotics resistance in bacteria. Science 352, aad9822 (2016).

  15. 15.

    , , & ProOpDB: Prokaryotic Operon DataBase. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D627–D631 (2012).

  16. 16.

    et al. Deep sequencing analysis of the Methanosarcina mazei Gö1 transcriptome in response to nitrogen availability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 21878–21882 (2009).

  17. 17.

    et al. ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 6, 26 (2011).

  18. 18.

    , , & WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188–1190 (2004).

  19. 19.

    , & Mechanisms of bacterial transcription termination: all good things must end. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 85, 319–347 (2016).

  20. 20.

    et al. Comparative transcriptomics of pathogenic and non-pathogenic Listeria species. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 583 (2012).

  21. 21.

    , , , & The excludon: a new concept in bacterial antisense RNA-mediated gene regulation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 75–82 (2012).

  22. 22.

    & cis-Antisense RNA, another level of gene regulation in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75, 286–300 (2011).

  23. 23.

    , & Mechanisms and consequences of alternative polyadenylation. Mol. Cell 43, 853–866 (2011).

  24. 24.

    et al. The X-ray crystal structure of the euryarchaeal RNA polymerase in an open-clamp configuration. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–11 (2014).

  25. 25.

    & Evolution of multisubunit RNA polymerases in the three domains of life. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 85–98 (2011).

  26. 26.

    et al. Prevalence of transcription promoters within archaeal operons and coding sequences. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 285 (2009).

  27. 27.

    et al. Base pairing interaction between 5′- and 3′- UTRs controls icaR mRNA translation in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS Genet. 9, e1004001 (2013).

  28. 28.

    , & Regulation by small RNAs in bacteria: expanding frontiers. Mol. Cell 43, 880–891 (2011).

  29. 29.

    et al. A single-base resolution map of an archaeal transcriptome. Genome Res. 20, 133–141 (2010).

  30. 30.

    et al. An assessment of bacterial small RNA target prediction programs. RNA Biol. 12, 509–513 (2015).

  31. 31.

    , , , & Primary transcriptome map of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis. BMC Genomics 15, 684 (2014).

  32. 32.

    , , & Reduced coenzyme F420: heterodisulfide oxidoreductase, a proton-translocating redox system in methanogenic bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 9449–9453 (1990).

  33. 33.

    , & The transcriptional activator NrpA is crucial for inducing nitrogen fixation in Methanosarcina mazei Gö1 under nitrogen-limited conditions. FEBS J. 281, 3507–3522 (2014).

  34. 34.

    , , & Sulfolobus: a new genus of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria living at low pH and high temperature. Arch. für Mikrobiol. 84, 54–68 (1972).

  35. 35.

    et al. Comparative transcriptomics across the prokaryotic tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W46–W53 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank M. Shamir, S. Doron, A. Millman and A. Lopatina for discussions. R.S. was supported, in part, by the Israel Science Foundation (personal grant no. 1303/12 and I-CORE grant no. 1796/12), the ERC-StG programme (grant no. 260432), the Abisch–Frenkel Foundation, the Pasteur–Weizmann council grant, the Minerva Foundation, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust and by a DIP grant from the Deutsche Forschungs Gemeinschaft (DFG). D.P. was funded by the DFG (Schm1052/9-2).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel

    • Daniel Dar
    •  & Rotem Sorek
  2. Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Institute of General Microbiology, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118 Kiel, Germany

    • Daniela Prasse
    •  & Ruth A. Schmitz

Authors

  1. Search for Daniel Dar in:

  2. Search for Daniela Prasse in:

  3. Search for Ruth A. Schmitz in:

  4. Search for Rotem Sorek in:

Contributions

D.D., R.A.S. and R.S conceived and designed the research studies. D.D. and D.P. performed the experiments. D.D. and R.S. analysed the data. D.D., RA.S., D.P. and R.S. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rotem Sorek.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1-4, Supplementary Table Legends 1-9, Supplementary References

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Tables

    Supplementary Tables 1-9

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.143

Further reading