Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Are multi-omics enough?

Multi-omic techniques are often seen as the future of microbiome studies. We argue that recent strategies for simplifying complex omic-derived data will need to be combined with improved cultivation techniques to pave the way towards a more targeted approach for understanding microbial communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

References

  1. Staley, J. T. & Konopka, A. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 39, 321–346 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yugi, K., Kubota, H., Hatano, A. & Kuroda, S. Trends Biotechnol. 34, 276–290 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abendroth, C., Vilanova, C., Günther, T., Luschnig, O. & Porcar, M. Biotechnol. Biofuels 8, 87 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morales, S. E. & Holben, W. E. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 75, 2–16 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Levy, R. & Borenstein, E. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 751, 329–345 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Larsen, P., Dai, Y. & Collart, F. R. Methods Mol. Biol. 1260, 33–43 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zomorrodi, A. R., Islam, M. M. & Maranas, C. D. ACS Synth. Biol. 3, 247–257 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorado-Morales, P., Vilanova, C., Garay, C. P., Martí, J. M. & Porcar, M. Sci. Rep. 5, 18396 (2015).

  9. Widder, S. et al. ISME J.http://doi.org/bkhv (2016).

  10. Rinke, C. et al. Nature 499, 431–437 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Albertsen, M. et al. Nature Biotechnol. 31, 533–538 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Luef, B. et al. Nature Commun. 6, 6372 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ling, L. L. et al. Nature 517, 455–459 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Prakash, T. & Taylor, T. D. Brief. Bioinform. 13, 711–727 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yus, E. et al. Science 326, 1263–1268 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Locey, K. J. & Lennon, J. T. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113 5970–5975 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Cristina Vilanova or Manuel Porcar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vilanova, C., Porcar, M. Are multi-omics enough?. Nat Microbiol 1, 16101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.101

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.101

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research