Perspective | Published:

Neural stem cells and neurospheres—re-evaluating the relationship

Nature Methods volume 2, pages 333336 (2005) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

For most of the past century, the prospect of replacing lost or damaged cells in the central nervous system (CNS) was hampered by the opinion that the adult mammalian CNS was incapable of generating new nerve cells. This belief, like most dogmas, was essentially founded on a lack of experimental evidence to the contrary. The overturning of this 'no new neuron' hypothesis began midway through the twentieth century with a series of reports documenting neurogenesis in the postnatal and adult brain1, continued with the isolation and in vitro culture of neurogenic cells from the adult mammalian brain2,3, and culminated in the discovery of a population of multipotent, self-renewing cells in the adult CNS (that is, bona fide neural stem cells)3,4,5. Although a variety of techniques were initially used, the neurosphere assay (NSA)3,6 rapidly emerged as the assay of choice and has since become a valuable tool for isolating, and understanding the biology of, embryonic and adult CNS stem cells. Like all technologies, it is not without its limitations. In this article we will highlight several shortcomings of the assay related to its application and interpretation that we believe have led to a significant body of research whose conclusions may well be misleading.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Neurogenesis in the adult brain: death of a dogma. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 1, 67–73 (2000).

  2. 2.

    , & De novo generation of neuronal cells from the adult mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 8591–8595 (1992).

  3. 3.

    & Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science 255, 1707–1710 (1992).

  4. 4.

    Mammalian neural stem cells. Science 287, 1433–1438 (2000).

  5. 5.

    et al. Is there a neural stem cell in the mammalian forebrain? Trends Neurosci. 19, 387–393 (1996a).

  6. 6.

    & Clonal and population analyses demonstrate that an EGF-responsive mammalian embryonic CNS precursor is a stem cell. Dev. Biol. 175, 1–13 (1996).

  7. 7.

    & Stem cells: attributes, cycles, spirals, pitfalls and uncertainties. Lessons for and from the crypt. Development 110, 1001–1020 (1990).

  8. 8.

    et al. Epidermal and fibroblast growth factors behave as mitogenic regulators for a single multipotent stem cell-like population from the subventricular region of the adult mouse forebrain. J. Neurosci. 19, 3287–3297 (1999).

  9. 9.

    et al. Multipotent neural stem cells reside into the rostral extension and olfactory bulb of adult rodents. J. Neurosci. 22, 437–445 (2002).

  10. 10.

    et al. Isolation and cloning of multipotential stem cells from the embryonic human CNS and establishment of transplantable human neural stem cell lines by epigenetic stimulation. Exp. Neurol. 156, 71–83 (1999).

  11. 11.

    et al. Biology of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors: implications for clinical application. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21, 759–806 (2003).

  12. 12.

    & Adult rodent neurogenic regions: the ventricular subependyma contains neural stem cells, but the dentate gyrus contains restricted progenitors. J. Neurosci. 22, 1784–1793 (2002).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Turning brain into blood: a hematopoietic fate adopted by adult neural stem cells in vivo. Science 283, 534–537 (1999).

  14. 14.

    et al. Purification of a pluripotent neural stem cell from the adult mouse brain. Nature 412, 736–739 (2001).

  15. 15.

    & LeX/ssea-1 is expressed by adult mouse CNS stem cells, identifying them as nonependymal. Neuron 35, 865–875 (2002).

  16. 16.

    & Distinct populations of forebrain neural stem and progenitor cells can be isolated using side-population analysis. J. Neurosci. 23, 10703–10709 (2003).

  17. 17.

    et al. LIF receptor signaling modulates neural stem cell renewal. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 27, 255–266 (2004).

  18. 18.

    et al. Distinct neural stem cells proliferate in response to EGF and FGF in the developing mouse telencephalon. Dev. Biol. 208, 166–188 (1999).

  19. 19.

    , & The ciliary neurotrophic factor/leukemia inhibitory factor/gp130 receptor complex operates in the maintenance of mammalian forebrain neural stem cells. J. Neurosci. 21, 7642–7653 (2001).

  20. 20.

    et al. p107 regulates neural precursor cells in the mammalian brain. J. Cell Biol. 166, 853–863 (2004).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory for Neural Stem Cell Biology, The Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. rietze@uq.edu.au or b.reynolds@uq.edu.au

    • Brent A Reynolds
    •  & Rodney L Rietze

Authors

  1. Search for Brent A Reynolds in:

  2. Search for Rodney L Rietze in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth758

Further reading