Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Minimizing the risk of reporting false positives in large-scale RNAi screens

Large-scale RNA interference (RNAi)-based analyses, very much as other 'omic' approaches, have inherent rates of false positives and negatives. The variability in the standards of care applied to validate results from these studies, if left unchecked, could eventually begin to undermine the credibility of RNAi as a powerful functional approach. This Commentary is an invitation to an open discussion started among various users of RNAi to set forth accepted standards that would insure the quality and accuracy of information in the large datasets coming out of genome-scale screens. Please visit methagora to view and post comments on this article

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Appropriate experimental controls to minimize risks of misinterpretation of RNAi data due to off-target effects (OTEs).


  1. Echeverri, C.J. & Perrimon, N. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 373–384 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cullen, B.R. Nat. Methods 3, 677–681 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson, A.L. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 635–637 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Birmingham, A. et al. Nat. Methods 3, 199–204 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Doench, J.G., Petersen, C.P. & Sharp, P.A. Genes Dev. 17, 438–442 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma, Y., Creanga, A., Lum, L. & Beachy, P.A. Nature advance online publication 10 September 2006 (doi: 10.1038/nature05179).

  7. Kulkarni, M.M. et al. Nat. Methods 3, 833–838 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Echeverri, C., Beachy, P., Baum, B. et al. Minimizing the risk of reporting false positives in large-scale RNAi screens. Nat Methods 3, 777–779 (2006).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing