Some scientists suggest that environmental standardization may lead to spurious findings. The implication from this hypothesis will likely be controversial.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Improving reproducibility in animal research by splitting the study population into several ‘mini-experiments’
Scientific Reports Open Access 06 October 2020
-
Impact of inherent variability and experimental parameters on the reliability of small animal PET data
EJNMMI Research Open Access 09 June 2012
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Richter, S.H., Garner, J.P. & Würbel, H. Nat. Methods 6, 257–261 (2009).
Wolfer, D. .P. et al. Nature 432, 821–822 (2004)
Crabbe, J.C., Wahlsten, D. & Dudek, B.C. Science 284, 1670–1672 (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paylor, R. Questioning standardization in science. Nat Methods 6, 253–254 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0409-253
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth0409-253
This article is cited by
-
Improving reproducibility in animal research by splitting the study population into several ‘mini-experiments’
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation
Nature Reviews Neuroscience (2020)
-
More than 3Rs: the importance of scientific validity for harm-benefit analysis of animal research
Lab Animal (2017)
-
Systematic heterogenization for better reproducibility in animal experimentation
Lab Animal (2017)
-
Standardize or Diversify Experimental Conditions in Ecotoxicology? A Case Study on Herbicide Toxicity to Larvae of Two Anuran Amphibians
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (2017)