Abstract
Optogenetics uses light exposure to manipulate physiology in genetically modified organisms. Abundant tools for optogenetic excitation are available, but the limitations of current optogenetic inhibitors present an obstacle to demonstrating the necessity of neuronal circuits. Here we show that anion channelrhodopsins can be used to specifically and rapidly inhibit neural systems involved in Drosophila locomotion, wing expansion, memory retrieval and gustation, thus demonstrating their broad utility in the circuit analysis of behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Dopaminergic systems create reward seeking despite adverse consequences
Nature Open Access 25 October 2023
-
A rise-to-threshold process for a relative-value decision
Nature Open Access 05 July 2023
-
Flexible neural control of transition points within the egg-laying behavioral sequence in Drosophila
Nature Neuroscience Open Access 22 May 2023
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


References
Sweeney, S.T., Broadie, K., Keane, J., Niemann, H. & O'Kane, C.J. Neuron 14, 341–351 (1995).
Kitamoto, T. J. Neurobiol. 47, 81–92 (2001).
Zemelman, B.V., Lee, G.A., Ng, M. & Miesenböck, G. Neuron 33, 15–22 (2002).
Boyden, E.S., Zhang, F., Bamberg, E., Nagel, G. & Deisseroth, K. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1263–1268 (2005).
Hamada, F.N. et al. Nature 454, 217–220 (2008).
Tye, K.M. & Deisseroth, K. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 251–266 (2012).
Lima, S.Q. & Miesenböck, G. Cell 121, 141–152 (2005).
Zhang, F. et al. Nature 446, 633–639 (2007).
Chow, B.Y. et al. Nature 463, 98–102 (2010).
Wietek, J. et al. Science 344, 409–412 (2014).
Berndt, A., Lee, S.Y., Ramakrishnan, C. & Deisseroth, K. Science 344, 420–424 (2014).
Govorunova, E.G., Sineshchekov, O.A., Janz, R., Liu, X. & Spudich, J.L. Science 349, 647–650 (2015).
Thoma, V. et al. Nat. Commun. 7, 10678 (2016).
Klapoetke, N.C. et al. Nat. Methods 11, 338–346 (2014).
Aso, Y. et al. eLife 3, e04580 (2014).
Wu, M.-C. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5367–5372 (2014).
Inada, K., Kohsaka, H., Takasu, E., Matsunaga, T. & Nose, A. PLoS One 6, e29019 (2011).
Mahn, M., Prigge, M., Ron, S., Levy, R. & Yizhar, O. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 554–556 (2016).
Knoflach, F., Hernandez, M.-C. & Bertrand, D. Biochem. Pharmacol. 115, 10–17 (2016).
Wiegert, J.S. & Oertner, T.G. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 527–528 (2016).
Salvaterra, P.M. & Kitamoto, T. Brain Res. Gene Expr. Patterns 1, 73–82 (2001).
Peabody, N.C. et al. J. Neurosci. 28, 14379–14391 (2008).
Petersen, L.K. & Stowers, R.S. PLoS One 6, e24531 (2011).
Weiss, L.A., Dahanukar, A., Kwon, J.Y., Banerjee, D. & Carlson, J.R. Neuron 69, 258–272 (2011).
Connolly, J.B. et al. Science 274, 2104–2107 (1996).
Freeman, M. Cell 87, 651–660 (1996).
Choi, Y.-J., Lee, G. & Park, J.H. Development 133, 2223–2232 (2006).
Pfeiffer, B.D. et al. Genetics 186, 735–755 (2010).
Claridge-Chang, A. et al. Cell 139, 405–415 (2009).
Vogt, K. et al. eLife 3, e02395 (2014).
Quinn, W.G., Harris, W.A. & Benzer, S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71, 708–712 (1974).
Van Vactor, D.L. Jr., Cagan, R.L., Krämer, H. & Zipursky, S.L. Cell 67, 1145–1155 (1991).
Park, D., Veenstra, J.A., Park, J.H., & Taghert, P.H. PLoS One 3, e1896 (2008).
Parnas, D., Haghighi, A.P., Fetter, R.D., Kim, S.W. & Goodman, C.S. Neuron 32, 415–424 (2001).
Verstreken, P. et al. Neuron 40, 733–748 (2003).
Tracey, W.D. Jr., Wilson, R.I., Laurent, G. & Benzer, S. Cell 113, 261–273 (2003).
Meliza, C.D. & Margoliash, D. J. Neurosci. 32, 15158–15168 (2012).
Altman, D., Machin, D., Bryant, T. & Gardner, S. Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Interval and Statistical Guidelines (BMJ Books, 2000).
Claridge-Chang, A. & Assam, P.N. Nat. Methods 13, 108–109 (2016).
Cumming, G. Understanding the New Statistics Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-analysis (Routledge, 2012).
Gardner, M.J. & Altman, D.G. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 292, 746–750 (1986).
Efron, B. Ann. Stat. 7, 1–26 (1979).
DiCiccio, T.J. & Efron, B. Stat. Sci. 11, 189–212 (1996).
Acknowledgements
We thank J. Spudich (University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston) for providing the GtACR1 and GtACR2 sequences and plasmids; J.A. Veenstra (Université de Bordeaux) for the anti-Crz antibody; G. Rubin (Howard Hughes Medical Institute) and J. Park (University of Tennessee, Knoxville) for providing materials; S. Aw (Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology) for loan of the high-speed camera; G. Augustine for reading the manuscript; L. Robinson (Insight Editing London) for editing of the manuscript; and S.Y.H. Tan for drawing the behavior rig diagrams. F.M., S.O., J.Y.C. and A.C.-C. were supported by grant MOE-2013-T2-2-054 from the Ministry of Education; J.C.S. and A.C.-C. were supported by grants 1231AFG030 and 1431AFG120 from the A*STAR Joint Council Office. J.H. was supported by the A*STAR Scientific Scholars Fund. T.-W.K. was supported by the National Research Foundation Fellowship NRF-NRFF2015-06 and a block grant from the Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory. The authors were supported by a Biomedical Research Council block grant to the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology. F.M., S.O., K.C. and A.C.-C. received support from the Duke-NUS Medical School, including the Integrated Biology and Medicine doctoral program (to K.C.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, F.M. and A.C.-C.; methodology, F.M., J.C.S. and A.C.-C.; software, J.C.S. (CRITTA, LabView) and J.H. (Python); investigation, F.M. (transgenic design, genetics, falling, walking immobilization, wing expansion, eye toxicity, valence, PER and neuroanatomy), J.C.S. (falling and high-frame rate paralysis), S.O. (learning and survival), J.Y.C. (brain dissection, immunohistochemistry and microscopy), K.C. (PER) and T.-W.K. (electrophysiology); resources, J.C.S. (instrumentation); data analysis, J.H. (valence, electrophysiology), K.C. (PER), J.C.S. (paralysis, falling and walking immobilization), S.O. (STM) and F.M. (paralysis, valence and anatomy); writing original draft, F.M. and A.C.-C. with contributions from all authors; writing revision, F.M., S.O., J.C.S. and A.C.-C.; visualization, F.M., J.H., J.C.S., S.O., K.C. and A.C.-C.; supervision, A.C.-C.; project administration, A.C.-C.; funding acquisition, A.C.-C.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figures 1–10 (PDF 24927 kb)
GtACR flies fall from a vertical surface when illuminated
Flies expressing one of three optogenetic inhibitors in their cholinergic neurons (Cha-Gal4>UAS-GtACR1, Cha-Gal4>UAS-GtACR2 and ChaGal4>UAS-eNpHR) were illuminated with light from a projector. Cha>GtACR1 and Cha>GtACR2 flies fell from the vertical acrylic surface upon exposure to green or blue light respectively, and were immobilized. Cha>GtACR2 flies retained some motor activity while illuminated with blue light. Cha>eNpHR flies did not fall upon exposure to red light and remained mobile. (MP4 9806 kb)
GtACR flies are immobilized by illumination
A. Green light at 38 μW/mm2 rendered a Cha>GtACR1 fly immobile, though it regained some motor control during illumination. Green dot indicates when light was turned on. B. Illumination of a GtACR1/+ fly with 38 μW/mm2 green light had no effect. C. A Cha>GtACR2 fly was rendered completely paralyzed by illumination with 391 μW/mm2 blue light. Blue dot indicates when light was turned on. D. A GtACR2/+ fly was unaffected by illumination with 391 μW/mm2 blue light. E. While positioned 3 mm above an amber LED (approximately 1.9 mW/mm2), a Cha>eNpHR fly retained mobility, though it was paralyzed transiently when passing directly above the emitter. Light was on throughout this recording. F. A Cha>eNpHR fly was unaffected by amber illumination at 495 μW/mm2. Amber dot indicates when light was on. (MP4 25723 kb)
Supplementary Video 3
Cha>GtACR flies adopt a static pose during illumination (indicated by colored dots), but Cha>Chrimson flies have active seizures and adopt a tetanic pose with extended wings. Control animals were unaffected by projector light (green 92 μW/mm2; blue 67 μW/mm2; red 70 μW/mm2). (MP4 25469 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohammad, F., Stewart, J., Ott, S. et al. Optogenetic inhibition of behavior with anion channelrhodopsins. Nat Methods 14, 271–274 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4148
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4148
This article is cited by
-
Flexible neural control of transition points within the egg-laying behavioral sequence in Drosophila
Nature Neuroscience (2023)
-
A rise-to-threshold process for a relative-value decision
Nature (2023)
-
A blue-shifted anion channelrhodopsin from the Colpodellida alga Vitrella brassicaformis
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Dopaminergic systems create reward seeking despite adverse consequences
Nature (2023)
-
Modeling exercise using optogenetically contractible Drosophila larvae
BMC Genomics (2022)