Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Simul-seq: combined DNA and RNA sequencing for whole-genome and transcriptome profiling


Paired DNA and RNA profiling is increasingly employed in genomics research to uncover molecular mechanisms of disease and to explore personal genotype and phenotype correlations. Here, we introduce Simul-seq, a technique for the production of high-quality whole-genome and transcriptome sequencing libraries from small quantities of cells or tissues. We apply the method to laser-capture-microdissected esophageal adenocarcinoma tissue, revealing a highly aneuploid tumor genome with extensive blocks of increased homozygosity and corresponding increases in allele-specific expression. Among this widespread allele-specific expression, we identify germline polymorphisms that are associated with response to cancer therapies. We further leverage this integrative data to uncover expressed mutations in several known cancer genes as well as a recurrent mutation in the motor domain of KIF3B that significantly affects kinesin–microtubule interactions. Simul-seq provides a new streamlined approach for generating comprehensive genome and transcriptome profiles from limited quantities of clinically relevant samples.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Simultaneous, single-tube sequencing of DNA and RNA.
Figure 2: Characterization of Simul-seq whole-genome data.
Figure 3: Characterization of Simul-seq transcriptome data.
Figure 4: Comprehensive genome and transcriptome profiling of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).
Figure 5: Identification and biochemical characterization of a recurrent mutation in KIF3B.

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Sequence Read Archive


  1. Shah, S.P. et al. The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers. Nature 486, 395–399 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grubert, F. et al. Genetic control of chromatin states in humans involves local and distal chromosomal interactions. Cell 162, 1051–1065 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Stranger, B.E. et al. Population genomics of human gene expression. Nat. Genet. 39, 1217–1224 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ongen, H. et al. Putative cis-regulatory drivers in colorectal cancer. Nature 512, 87–90 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, J.B. et al. Genome-wide identification of human RNA editing sites by parallel DNA capturing and sequencing. Science 324, 1210–1213 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tuch, B.B. et al. Tumor transcriptome sequencing reveals allelic expression imbalances associated with copy number alterations. PLoS One 5, e9317 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Su, A.I. et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6062–6067 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lappalainen, T. et al. Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans. Nature 501, 506–511 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Macaulay, I.C. et al. G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes. Nat. Methods 12, 519–522 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dey, S.S., Kester, L., Spanjaard, B. & Van, A. Integrated genome and transcriptome sequencing from the same cell. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1–19 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lam, H.Y.K. et al. Performance comparison of whole-genome sequencing platforms. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 78–82 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Adey, A. et al. Rapid, low-input, low-bias construction of shotgun fragment libraries by high-density in vitro transposition. Genome Biol. 11, R119 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker, S.C. et al. The External RNA Controls Consortium: a progress report. Nat. Methods 2, 731–734 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawrence, M.S. et al. Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumour types. Nature 505, 495–501 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinstein, J.N. et al. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature 507, 315–322 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao, M., Kim, P., Mitra, R., Zhao, J. & Zhao, Z. TSGene 2.0: an updated literature-based knowledgebase for tumor suppressor genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 4, D1023–D1031 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adzhubei, I.A. et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat. Methods 7, 248–249 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar, P., Henikoff, S. & Ng, P.C. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1073–1081 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yadav, M. et al. Predicting immunogenic tumour mutations by combining mass spectrometry and exome sequencing. Nature 515, 572–576 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robbins, P.F. et al. Mining exomic sequencing data to identify mutated antigens recognized by adoptively transferred tumor-reactive T cells. Nat. Med. 19, 747–752 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Schumacher, T.N. & Schreiber, R.D. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science 348, 69–74 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Futreal, P.A. et al. A census of human cancer genes. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 177–183 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Joerger, A.C., Ang, H.C. & Fersht, A.R. Structural basis for understanding oncogenic p53 mutations and designing rescue drugs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15056–15061 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bullock, A.N., Henckel, J. & Fersht, A.R. Quantitative analysis of residual folding and DNA binding in mutant p53 core domain: definition of mutant states for rescue in cancer therapy. Oncogene 19, 1245–1256 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gautschi, O. et al. Cyclin D1 (CCND1) A870G gene polymorphism modulates smoking-induced lung cancer risk and response to platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Lung Cancer 51, 303–311 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Absenger, G. et al. The cyclin D1 (CCND1) rs9344 G>A polymorphism predicts clinical outcome in colon cancer patients treated with adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Pharmacogenomics J. 14, 130–134 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gonçalves, A. et al. A polymorphism of EGFR extracellular domain is associated with progression free-survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving cetuximab-based treatment. BMC Cancer 8, 169 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hsieh, Y.Y., Tzeng, C.H., Chen, M.H., Chen, P.M. & Wang, W.S. Epidermal growth factor receptor R521K polymorphism shows favorable outcomes in KRAS wild-type colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab-based chemotherapy. Cancer Sci. 103, 791–796 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu, Y. & Feng, Y.-M. The role of kinesin family proteins in tumorigenesis and progression: potential biomarkers and molecular targets for cancer therapy. Cancer 116, 5150–5160 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jimbo, T. et al. Identification of a link between the tumour suppressor APC and the kinesin superfamily. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 323–327 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Woehlke, G. et al. Microtubule interaction site of the kinesin motor. Cell 90, 207–216 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dey, S.S., Kester, L., Spanjaard, B., Bienko, M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Integrated genome and transcriptome sequencing of the same cell. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 285–289 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Macaulay, I.C. et al. G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes. Nat. Methods 12, 519–522 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Adiconis, X. et al. Comparative analysis of RNA sequencing methods for degraded or low-input samples. Nat. Methods 10, 623–629 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao, W. et al. Comparison of RNA-Seq by poly (A) capture, ribosomal RNA depletion, and DNA microarray for expression profiling. BMC Genomics 15, 419 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Nones, K. et al. Genomic catastrophes frequently arise in esophageal adenocarcinoma and drive tumorigenesis. Nat. Commun. 5, 5224 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Agrawal, N. et al. Comparative genomic analysis of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2, 899–905 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Dulak, A.M. et al. Exome and whole-genome sequencing of esophageal adenocarcinoma identifies recurrent driver events and mutational complexity. Nat. Genet. 45, 478–486 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Haraguchi, K., Hayashi, T., Jimbo, T., Yamamoto, T. & Akiyama, T. Role of the kinesin-2 family protein, KIF3, during mitosis. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 4094–4099 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu, X. et al. Small molecule induced reactivation of mutant p53 in cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 6034–6044 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Stachler, M.D. et al. Paired exome analysis of Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma. Nat. Genet. 47, 1047–1055 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Moriai, T., Kobrin, M.S., Hope, C., Speck, L. & Korc, M. A variant epidermal growth factor receptor exhibits altered type alpha transforming growth factor binding and transmembrane signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10217–10221 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang, W. et al. Cyclin D1 and epidermal growth factor polymorphisms associated with survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with Cetuximab. Pharmacogenet. Genomics 16, 475–483 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 17, 10–12 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. DePristo, M.A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7, 562–578 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 511–515 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang, L., Wang, S. & Li, W. RSeQC: quality control of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics 28, 2184–2185 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Quinlan, A.R. & Hall, I.M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Liao, Y., Smyth, G.K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Roth, A. et al. JointSNVMix: a probabilistic model for accurate detection of somatic mutations in normal/tumour paired next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 907–913 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 213–219 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Larson, D.E. et al. SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 311–317 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Koboldt, D.C. et al. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 22, 568–576 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang, J. et al. CREST maps somatic structural variation in cancer genomes with base-pair resolution. Nat. Methods 8, 652–654 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang, J. et al. INTEGRATE: gene fusion discovery using whole genome and transcriptome data. Genome Res. 26, 108–118 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Krzywinski, M. et al. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 19, 1639–1645 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Cingolani, P. et al. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a model for genotoxic chemical mutational studies with a new program, SnpSift. Front. Genet. 3, 35 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Romanel, A., Lago, S., Prandi, D., Sboner, A. & Demichelis, F. ASEQ: fast allele-specific studies from next-generation sequencing data. BMC Med. Genomics 8, 9 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Stock, M.F. & Hackney, D.D. Expression of kinesin in Escherichia coli. Methods Mol. Biol. 164, 43–48 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank C. Araya, C. Cenik, P. Dumesic, D. Phanstiel and D. Webster for many helpful discussions and input regarding the manuscript and analyses. We acknowledge J. Churko from the laboratory of J. Wu at Stanford University for providing the fibroblasts as well as the work of both the sequencing core at the Stanford Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine and the Genetics Bioinformatics Service Center, with special thanks to G. Euskirchen, L. Ramirez, C. Eastman, N. Watson and N. Hammond. Finally, we would like to thank H. Chen from Bina Technologies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



J.A.R., D.V.S. and M.P.S. conceived the project, designed experiments and wrote the manuscript. J.A.R. and D.V.S. performed analyses and experiments. R.K.P. provided pathology expertise and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded esophageal adenocarcinoma specimens. Work in the Snyder lab is supported by NIH grants to M.P.S. (1P50HG00773501 and 8U54DK10255602). J.A.R. was supported by the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, and D.V.S. was supported by an NIH T32 fellowship (HG000044) and a Genentech Graduate Fellowship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael P Snyder.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.P.S. is a cofounder of Personalis and a member of the scientific advisory boards of Personalis and Genapsys.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Simul-seq library preparation and quality control.

(a) Histogram of incubation times for parallel Tru-seq DNA and RNA library preparation as well as Simul-seq. (b) High-sensitivity DNA bioanalyzer trace for a yeast/human mixed Simul-seq library. Note, this trace is representative of an average Simul-seq library. (c-d) Representative droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) raw fluorescence amplitude data (left) and assay design (right) for quantification of DNA (c) and RNA (d) constituents of Simul-seq libraries.

Supplementary Figure 2 Comparison of variant calls between Simul-seq genome and DNA-seq replicates.

(a-b) Venn diagrams comparing SNV (a) and indel (b) calls between the Simul-seq genome and two DNA-seq control genomes derived from different tissues of the same individual13.

Supplementary Figure 3 Distribution of coding and noncoding genes in Simul-seq transcriptome.

Bar graph of all Ensembl biotype annotations for genes with FPKM values greater than or equal to 5.

Supplementary Figure 4 Simul-seq and RNA-seq replicates are well correlated.

Scatter plots of Log10(FPKM+1) gene measurements for Simul-seq and RNA-seq replicates. Spearman’s ρ correlation values for each comparison are shown.

Supplementary Figure 5 DNA and RNA sequencing data for 50,000 (50K) fibroblast replicates.

(a) Coverage distributions for Simul-seq libraries of the same individual. (b) Venn diagrams comparing SNV calls between the Simul-seq replicates. (c) Scatter plots of Log10(FPKM+1) gene measurements for 50K Simul-seq replicates (Spearman’s ρ=0.97). (d) Correlation between External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) spike-in control Log10 RNA concentrations versus the average Log10(RPKM+1) for Simul-seq (blue; Spearman’s ρ=0.97) and 50K Simul-seq (orange; Spearman’s ρ=0.96) fibroblast replicates (n=2/group). Note, zero values have been shifted to 1, and all ERCC transcripts are shown.

Supplementary Figure 6 Simul-seq replicate and tumor RNA quality control analysis.

(a) Distribution of normalized transcript coverage for RNA-seq and Simul-seq replicates performed on fibroblasts as well as Simul-seq data obtained for esophageal adenocarcinoma tissue isolated using laser capture microscopy (Simul-seq EAC). (b) Strand specificity of Simul-seq and RNA-seq samples. (c) The fraction of reads mapping to various genomic annotations for Simul-seq and RNA-seq samples. Note, an increased intronic read fraction combined with a similar intergenic read fraction in the Simul-seq EAC sample likely indicates increased intron retention and/or a higher proportion of unspliced RNA in this specimen.

Supplementary Figure 7 Targeted resequencing of KIF3B locus in esophageal adenocarcinoma patient samples.

(a) Histogram of the unique and unmapped Bowtie aligned reads obtained for 76 FFPE samples (50 tumors and 26 normals). The original sample (02-28923-C9) that was subjected to the Simul-seq protocol was included as a positive control. A single tumor-normal pair (00-18224-A2) displayed a substantially higher number of variant calls yet a lower number of uniquely mapped reads, suggesting that these samples harbored increased rates of PCR errors induced by low quality genomic DNA. Therefore, these samples were not included in somatic mutation analysis. (b) Validation of variant calls using pyrophosphate sequencing.

Supplementary Figure 8 Purification of recombinant wild-type and R293W mutant motor domains.

(a) Schematic of KIF3B protein, with motor domain and ATP binding region highlighted in blue and red, respectively. For biochemical assays, a region spanning the motor domain of KIF3B (amino acids 1-365) was cloned and recombinantly expressed with an N-terminal 6x-Histidine tag (bottom). (b) Coomassie stained gel of recombinant proteins pre- and post-induction with Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) as well as after Ni2+ affinity purification.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–8 and Supplementary Note. (PDF 1853 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Simul-seq and control library read counts and mapping rates. (XLSX 12 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Somatic SVs for Simul-seq EAC tumor genome (XLSX 35 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Somatic, expressed gene fusions in Simul-seq EAC tumor genome (XLSX 9 kb)

Supplementary Table 4

VCF of somatic SNVs for Simul-seq EAC tumor genome (XLSX 2379 kb)

Supplementary Table 5

VCF of somatic indels for Simul-seq EAC tumor genome (XLSX 474 kb)

Supplementary Table 6

EAC tumor ASE analysis at heterozygous SNV positions in the normal genome (XLSX 7583 kb)

Supplementary Table 7

ASE of annotated tumor supressor genes harboring damaging germline variants (XLSX 12 kb)

Supplementary Table 8

Simul-seq RNA and RNA-seq ERCC spike-in transcript quantification (XLSX 16 kb)

Supplementary Table 9

Genomic regions of KIF3B locus targeted for resequencing (XLSX 8 kb)

Supplementary Table 10

Primer sets used in KIF3B targeted resequencing (XLSX 11 kb)

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reuter, J., Spacek, D., Pai, R. et al. Simul-seq: combined DNA and RNA sequencing for whole-genome and transcriptome profiling. Nat Methods 13, 953–958 (2016).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing