Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Three-dimensional force microscopy of cells in biopolymer networks

Nature Methods volume 13, pages 171–176 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

We describe a technique for the quantitative measurement of cell-generated forces in highly nonlinear three-dimensional biopolymer networks that mimic the physiological situation of living cells. We computed forces of MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells from the measured network deformations around the cells using a finite-element approach based on a constitutive equation that captures the complex mechanical properties of diverse biopolymers such as collagen gels, fibrin gels and Matrigel. Our measurements show that breast carcinoma cells cultured in collagen gels generated nearly constant forces regardless of the collagen concentration and matrix stiffness. Furthermore, time-lapse force measurements showed that these cells migrated in a gliding motion with alternating phases of high and low contractility, elongation, migratory speed and persistence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Macrorheology of collagen type I gels and semi-affine model description.
Figure 2: Experimental validation of the constitutive equation for collagen gels.
Figure 3: Reconstruction of cellular forces inside a 1.2–mg ml−1 collagen gel.
Figure 4: Contractility of MDA-MB-231 cells in gels with different collagen concentrations.
Figure 5: Time-lapse force microscopy of a breast carcinoma cell inside collagen gel.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedl, P., Zanker, K.S. & Brocker, E.B. Cell migration strategies in 3-D extracellular matrix: differences in morphology, cell matrix interactions, and integrin function. Microsc. Res. Tech. 43, 369–378 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zaman, M.H. et al. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10889–10894 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedl, P. & Wolf, K. Proteolytic interstitial cell migration: a five-step process. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 28, 129–135 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedl, P., Wolf, K. & Lammerding, J. Nuclear mechanics during cell migration. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23, 55–64 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koch, T.M., Muenster, S., Bonakdar, N., Buttler, J.P. & Fabry, B. 3D traction forces in cancer cell invasion. PLoS ONE 7, e33476 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lämmermann, T. et al. Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing. Nature 453, 51–55 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dembo, M. & Wang, Y.L. Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. Biophys. J. 76, 2307–2316 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Butler, J.P., Tolic-Norrelykke, I.M., Fabry, B. & Fredberg, J.J. Traction fields, moments, and strain energy that cells exert on their surroundings. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 282, C595–C605 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sabass, B., Gardel, M.L., Waterman, C.M. & Schwarz, U.S. High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. Biophys. J. 94, 207–220 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Legant, W.R. et al. Multidimensional traction force microscopy reveals out-of-plane rotational moments about focal adhesions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 881–886 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Legant, W.R. et al. Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices. Nat. Methods 7, 969–971 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Storm, C., Pastore, J.J., MacKintosh, F.C., Lubensky, T.C. & Janmey, P.A. Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels. Nature 435, 191–194 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arevalo, R.C., Urbach, J.S. & Blair, D.L. Size-dependent rheology of type-I collagen networks. Biophys. J. 99, L65–L67 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Münster, S. et al. Strain history dependence of the nonlinear stress response of fibrin and collagen networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12197–12202 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Voytik-Harbin, S.L., Roeder, B.A., Sturgis, J.E., Kokini, K. & Robinson, J.P. Simultaneous mechanical loading and confocal reflection microscopy for three-dimensional microbiomechanical analysis of biomaterials and tissue constructs. Microsc. Microanal. 9, 74–85 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vader, D., Kabla, A., Weitz, D. & Mahadevan, L. Strain-induced alignment in collagen gels. PLoS ONE 4, e5902 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roeder, B.A., Kokini, K. & Voytik-Harbin, S.L. Fibril microstructure affects strain transmission within collagen extracellular matrices. J. Biomech. Eng. 131, 031004 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown, A.E., Litvinov, R.I., Discher, D.E., Purohit, P.K. & Weisel, J.W. Multiscale mechanics of fibrin polymer: gel stretching with protein unfolding and loss of water. Science 325, 741–744 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Onck, P.R., Koeman, T., van Dillen, T. & van der Giessen, E. Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 178102 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Heussinger, C., Schaefer, B. & Frey, E. Nonaffine rubber elasticity for stiff polymer networks. Phys. Rev. E 76, 031906 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stein, A.M., Vader, D.A., Weitz, D.A. & Sander, L.M. The micromechanics of three-dimensional collagen-I gels. Complexity 16, 22–28 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheinman, M., Broedersz, C.P. & MacKintosh, F.C. Nonlinear effective-medium theory of disordered spring networks. Phys. Rev. E 85, 021801 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stylianopoulos, T. & Barocas, V.H. Volume-averaging theory for the study of the mechanics of collagen networks. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196, 2981–2990 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Licup, A.J. et al. Stress controls the mechanics of collagen networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 9573–9578 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kraning-Rush, C.M., Carey, S.P., Califano, J.P., Smith, B.N. & Reinhart-King, C.A. The role of the cytoskeleton in cellular force generation in 2D and 3D environments. Phys. Biol. 8, 015009 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lautscham, L.A. et al. Migration in confined 3D environments is determined by a combination of adhesiveness, nuclear volume, contractility, and cell stiffness. Biophys. J. 109, 900–913 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lang, N.R. et al. Estimating the 3D pore size distribution of biopolymer networks from directionally biased data. Biophys. J. 105, 1967–1975 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Metzner, C. et al. Superstatistical analysis and modelling of heterogeneous random walks. Nat. Commun. 6, 7516 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mickel, W. et al. Robust pore size analysis of filamentous networks from 3D confocal microscopy. Biophys. J. 95, 6072–6080 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pelham, R.J. Jr. & Wang, Y. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13661–13665 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Engler, A. et al. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys. J. 86, 617–628 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Reinhart-King, C.A., Dembo, M. & Hammer, D.A. The dynamics and mechanics of endothelial cell spreading. Biophys. J. 89, 676–689 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bonakdar, N. et al. Biomechanical characterization of a desminopathy in primary human myoblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 419, 703–707 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Faust, U. et al. Cyclic stress at mHz frequencies aligns fibroblasts in direction of zero strain. PLoS ONE 6, e28963 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kollmannsberger, P. & Fabry, B. High-force magnetic tweezers with force feedback for biological applications. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 114301 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nelder, J.A. & Mead, R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 7, 308–313 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Huber, P.J. Robust Statistics (John Wiley & Sons, 1981).

  38. Tikhonov, A.N. Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Soviet Mathematics Doklady 4, 1035–1038 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hersch, N. et al. The constant beat: cardiomyocytes adapt their forces by equal contraction upon environmental stiffening. Biol. Open 2, 351–361 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.P. Butler (Harvard University) for helpful discussions and for developing a method to locate the force epicenter from a 3D vector field, and we thank P. Strissel (University Clinics Erlangen) for help with Matrigel experiments. We acknowledge E. Wagena (Radboud University Nijmegen) for generating dual-color HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells, which were a gift from K. Wolf (Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands). This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) Research Training Group 1962 “Dynamic Interactions at Biological Membranes: From Single Molecules to Tissue,” the US National Institutes of Health (NIH-HL65960) and the Emerging Fields Initiative of the University of Erlangen–Nuremberg.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany

    Julian Steinwachs, Claus Metzner, Kai Skodzek, Nadine Lang, Ingo Thievessen, Christoph Mark & Ben Fabry

  2. Department of Biological Physics, Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany

    Stefan Münster

  3. Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

    Katerina E Aifantis

Authors
  1. Julian Steinwachs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claus Metzner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kai Skodzek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nadine Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ingo Thievessen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Christoph Mark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stefan Münster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Katerina E Aifantis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ben Fabry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.S., B.F., S.M., I.T., N.L. and K.S. designed the setup and performed the experiments; J.S., C. Metzner and K.E.A. developed the material model and mathematical tools; J.S., C. Metzner and C. Mark wrote the data-acquisition and analysis software; J.S., S.M. and B.F. wrote the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Steinwachs.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Notes 1–21 (PDF 7969 kb)

Supplementary Software

Unconstrained force reconstruction software as used in the manuscript. (ZIP 19048 kb)

Time lapse video of force density of an MEF cell over 22h

Time lapse image series showing force density around a primary MEF cell migrating inside a collagen gel over a time course of 22h. After 10h, the cell divides, which is associated with a strong but temporary reduction of traction forces. After division, the daughter cells migrate in opposite directions in a persistent gliding motion characterized by synchronous changes in elongation and contractility. (MOV 4116 kb)

Time lapse video of force densities of 20 MDA-MB-231 cells over 2h

Time lapse image series showing force density, morphology and motility of 20 MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells inside a collagen gel recorded over 2h. Red arrows indicate the local force density. Green lines indicate the long and short axes of the cell. The intersection of the green lines coincides with the center of mass of the cell. Note that in general the highly mobile cells show large contractile forces and an elongated cell shape. (MOV 4749 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Steinwachs, J., Metzner, C., Skodzek, K. et al. Three-dimensional force microscopy of cells in biopolymer networks. Nat Methods 13, 171–176 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3685

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3685

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research