Abstract
We describe a data collection method that uses a single crystal to solve X-ray structures by native SAD (single-wavelength anomalous diffraction). We solved the structures of 11 real-life examples, including a human membrane protein, a protein-DNA complex and a 266-kDa multiprotein-ligand complex, using this method. The data collection strategy is suitable for routine structure determination and can be implemented at most macromolecular crystallography synchrotron beamlines.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Antiviral drug research for Japanese encephalitis: an updated review
Pharmacological Reports Open Access 19 February 2022
-
Functional characterization and structural bases of two class I diterpene synthases in pimarane-type diterpene biosynthesis
Communications Chemistry Open Access 30 September 2021
-
Drosophila TNFRs Grindelwald and Wengen bind Eiger with different affinities and promote distinct cellular functions
Nature Communications Open Access 06 April 2021
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


Change history
06 February 2015
In the version of this article initially published, the Hendrickson formula in the Figure 2 legend incorrectly had (2NA/NP)1/2 divided by (f″/Zeff); these terms should have been multiplied. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
References
Hendrickson, W.A. Q. Rev. Biophys. 47, 49–93 (2014).
Hendrickson, W.A. & Teeter, M.M. Nature 290, 107–113 (1981).
Mueller, M., Wang, M. & Schulze-Briese, C. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 68, 42–56 (2012).
Kabsch, W. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010).
de la Fortelle, E. & Bricogne, G. Methods Enzymol. 276, 472–494 (1997).
Wang, B.C. Methods Enzymol. 115, 90–112 (1985).
Sheldrick, G.M. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 479–485 (2010).
Dauter, Z., Dauter, M., de La Fortelle, E., Bricogne, G. & Sheldrick, G.M. J. Mol. Biol. 289, 83–92 (1999).
Weiss, M.S., Sicker, T., Djinovic-Carugo, K. & Hilgenfeld, R. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 57, 689–695 (2001).
Liu, Z.J. et al. Acta Crystallogr. A 67, 544–549 (2011).
Liu, Q. et al. Science 336, 1033–1037 (2012).
Liu, Q., Liu, Q. & Hendrickson, W.A. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 69, 1314–1332 (2013).
Li, D. et al. Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 2034–2047 (2014).
Sharma, A., Kottur, J., Narayanan, N. & Nair, D.T. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 5104–5114 (2013).
McCoy, A.J. et al. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
Prota, A.E. et al. Science 339, 587–590 (2013).
Ito, K. et al. J. Mol. Biol. 408, 177–186 (2011).
Diederichs, K. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 733–740 (2010).
Zeldin, O.B., Gerstel, M. & Garman, E.F. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46, 1225–1230 (2013).
Dinapoli, R. et al. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 731, 68–73 (2013).
Adams, M.W.W. et al. Acc. Chem. Res. 36, 191–198 (2003).
Yokoyama, S. et al. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7 (suppl.), 943–945 (2000).
Basilico, F., Maffini, S., Weir, J. & Prumbaum, D. eLife 3, 1–28 (2014).
Jordan, M.A. & Wilson, L. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 253–265 (2004).
Prota, A.E. et al. J. Cell Biol. 200, 259–270 (2013).
Henrich, B. et al. Detect. Assoc. Equip. 607, 247–249 (2009).
Adams, P.D. et al. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).
Pape, T. & Schneider, T.R. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 37, 843–844 (2004).
Cowtan, K., Zhang, K. & Main, P. in International Tables for Crystallography Volume F: Crystallography of Biological Macromolecules (eds. Arnold, E., Himmel, D.M. & Rossmann, M.G.) Chapter 15.1, 385–400 (International Union of Crystallography, 2012).
Cowtan, K. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 62, 1002–1011 (2006).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Murshudov, G.N. et al. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355–367 (2011).
The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.5.0.4 Schrödinger LLC <http://www.pymol.org/>.
Cowtan, K. Nautilus software for automated nucleic acid building. CCP4 Newsl. 48 (2012).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank C. Schulze-Briese, W. Glettig, M. Salathe, X. Wang and C. Pradervand for developing the PRIGo goniometer and C. Dekker for her help in validating the data collection method.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.W. and B.-C.W. conceived the research; S.W., V.O. and M.W. designed the experiments; L.C., H.Z., D.Z., J.R., A.E., S.K., D.L., N.H., G.S., A.P., K.B., A.E.P., P.S., J.K., D.T.N., F.B., V.C., S.P., A.B. and O.W. prepared samples; T.W., S.W., V.O., E.P. and M.W. performed experiments; T.W., S.W., V.O. and M.W. analyzed data; T.W., V.O., M.O.S., M.C. and M.W. wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
G.S. and A.P. declare competing financial interests as employees of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG.
Integrated supplementary information
Supplementary Figure 2 Analysis of anomalous peak heights.
Anomalous peak heights are shown as connected dots with data sets merged from consecutive 360° “turns” (see Supplementary Table 3 for details).
Supplementary Figure 4 Comparison of anomalous peak heights between conventional, high-redundancy single-orientation and high-redundancy multiple-orientation T2R-TTL data sets.
Low redundancy single orientation (1 × 360º at Chi = 0º), high redundancy single orientation (8 × 360º at Chi = 0º) and high redundancy multiple orientation (1 × 360º at Chi = 0º, 5º, 10º, 15º, 20º, 25º, 30º and 0°) T2R-TTL data sets were measured with similar total X-ray dose. All data were collected on one crystal. The anomalous peak heights calculated to 3.0 Å resolution are substantially higher for the low dose high redundancy multiple orientation data collection protocol.
Supplementary Figure 5 Ideal exposure for a phasing experiment with T2R-TTL as a test case.
Data sets of 180º were collected at 6 keV with 1.5 × 1010 photons/s with the following oscillation range / exposure time: (a) - 0.1° / 0.025 s; (b) - 0.1° / 0.1 s; (c) - 0.1° / 0.4 s. Data were processed with XDS, and the plots were generated from XDS_ASCII.HKL. Ideal exposure was characterized by strong reflections in the overall count range from 1000 to 10000 reaching the final (I/σ)asymptotic value (marked with dotted lines). These reflections were measured as accurately as possible without unnecessary X-ray exposure, thus optimally balancing overall radiation damage with redundancy.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Text and Figures
Supplementary Figures 1–5 and Supplementary Tables 1–3 (PDF 3118 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weinert, T., Olieric, V., Waltersperger, S. et al. Fast native-SAD phasing for routine macromolecular structure determination. Nat Methods 12, 131–133 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3211
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3211
This article is cited by
-
Antiviral drug research for Japanese encephalitis: an updated review
Pharmacological Reports (2022)
-
Functional characterization and structural bases of two class I diterpene synthases in pimarane-type diterpene biosynthesis
Communications Chemistry (2021)
-
Drosophila TNFRs Grindelwald and Wengen bind Eiger with different affinities and promote distinct cellular functions
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Fast and accurate data collection for macromolecular crystallography using the JUNGFRAU detector
Nature Methods (2018)
-
In situ serial crystallography for rapid de novo membrane protein structure determination
Communications Biology (2018)