Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Refined DNase-seq protocol and data analysis reveals intrinsic bias in transcription factor footprint identification

Nature Methods volume 11, pages 73–78 (2014)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Sequencing of DNase I hypersensitive sites (DNase-seq) is a powerful technique for identifying cis-regulatory elements across the genome. We studied the key experimental parameters to optimize performance of DNase-seq. Sequencing short fragments of 50–100 base pairs (bp) that accumulate in long internucleosome linker regions was more efficient for identifying transcription factor binding sites compared to sequencing longer fragments. We also assessed the potential of DNase-seq to predict transcription factor occupancy via generation of nucleotide-resolution transcription factor footprints. In modeling the sequence-specific DNase I cutting bias, we found a strong effect that varied over more than two orders of magnitude. This indicates that the nucleotide-resolution cleavage patterns at many transcription factor binding sites are derived from intrinsic DNase I cleavage bias rather than from specific protein-DNA interactions. In contrast, quantitative comparison of DNase I hypersensitivity between states can predict transcription factor occupancy associated with particular biological perturbations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Effect of digestion level and fragment size on recovery of known TF binding sites.
Figure 2: Nucleosome-positioning effects on DNase-seq results.
Figure 3: Pair-end sequencing of DHS sites.
Figure 4: CTCF footprint.
Figure 5: DNase I cleavage bias as revealed by AR and P53 binding.
Figure 6: Predicting TF binding from DNase-seq tag count and footprint score.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Referenced accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Galas, D.J. & Schmitz, A. DNAse footprinting: a simple method for the detection of protein-DNA binding specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. 5, 3157–3170 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Song, L. et al. Open chromatin defined by DNase I and FAIRE identifies regulatory elements that shape cell-type identity. Genome Res. 21, 1757–1767 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyle, A.P. et al. High-resolution genome-wide in vivo footprinting of diverse transcription factors in human cells. Genome Res. 21, 456–464 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Degner, J.F. et al. DNase I sensitivity QTLs are a major determinant of human expression variation. Nature 482, 390–394 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Neph, S. et al. An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints. Nature 489, 83–90 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Thurman, R.E. et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489, 75–82 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Maurano, M.T. et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337, 1190–1195 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Voss, T.C. et al. Dynamic exchange at regulatory elements during chromatin remodeling underlies assisted loading mechanism. Cell 146, 544–554 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ling, G., Sugathan, A., Mazor, T., Fraenkel, E. & Waxman, D.J. Unbiased, genome-wide in vivo mapping of transcriptional regulatory elements reveals sex differences in chromatin structure associated with sex-specific liver gene expression. Mol. Cell Biol. 30, 5531–5544 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. John, S. et al. Chromatin accessibility pre-determines glucocorticoid receptor binding patterns. Nat. Genet. 43, 264–268 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. He, H.H. et al. Differential DNase I hypersensitivity reveals factor-dependent chromatin dynamics. Genome Res. 22, 1015–1025 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tewari, A.K. et al. Chromatin accessibility reveals insights into androgen receptor activation and transcriptional specificity. Genome Biol. 13, R88 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. He, H.H. et al. Nucleosome dynamics define transcriptional enhancers. Nat. Genet. 42, 343–347 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaffney, D.J. et al. Controls of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003036 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Luger, K., Dechassa, M.L. & Tremethick, D.J. New insights into nucleosome and chromatin structure: an ordered state or a disordered affair? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 436–447 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lazarovici, A. et al. Probing DNA shape and methylation state on a genomic scale with DNase I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6376–6381 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Campbell, V.W. & Jackson, D.A. The effect of divalent cations on the mode of action of DNase I. The initial reaction products produced from covalently closed circular DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 255, 3726–3735 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grontved, L. et al. Rapid genome-scale mapping of chromatin accessibility in tissue. Epigenetics Chromatin 5, 10 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Matys, V. et al. TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D108–D110 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. ENCODE Project Consortium. et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).

  22. Zhang, Y., Shin, H., Song, J.S., Lei, Y. & Liu, X.S. Identifying positioned nucleosomes with epigenetic marks in human from ChIP-Seq. BMC Genomics 9, 537 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the US National Institutes of Health (1R01 GM099409 to X.S.L.; 1U41 HG007000 to X.S.L. and C.A.M.; 2P50 CA090381-06 to C.A.M. and M.B.; 2R01 DK074967-06 to M.B. and X.S.L., 1K99CA172948-01 to H.H.H.); the Mazzone Award (to X.S.L.), the Department of Defense (W81XWH-10-1-0557 to H.H.H.) and the Prostate Cancer Foundation (to M.B.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Housheng Hansen He, Clifford A Meyer and Sheng'en Shawn Hu: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Housheng Hansen He, Clifford A Meyer, Chongzhi Zang, Teng Fei, Han Xu & X Shirley Liu

  2. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Housheng Hansen He, Teng Fei & Myles Brown

  3. Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Housheng Hansen He, Clifford A Meyer, Sheng'en Shawn Hu, Mei-Wei Chen, Chongzhi Zang, Yin Liu, Prakash K Rao, Teng Fei, Han Xu, Henry Long, X Shirley Liu & Myles Brown

  4. Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Center–University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Housheng Hansen He

  5. Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Housheng Hansen He

  6. Department of Bioinformatics, School of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China

    Sheng'en Shawn Hu & Yin Liu

Authors
  1. Housheng Hansen He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Clifford A Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sheng'en Shawn Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mei-Wei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chongzhi Zang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Prakash K Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Teng Fei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Han Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Henry Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. X Shirley Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Myles Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.H.H., C.A.M., H.L., X.S.L. and M.B. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. M.-W.C. and H.H.H. performed the experiments with the help from Y.L., P.K.R. and T.F. C.A.M., S.S.H. and H.H.H. conducted the data analysis with the help from C.Z. and H.X.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Henry Long, X Shirley Liu or Myles Brown.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–21, Supplementary Tables 1–3 and Supplementary Protocol (PDF 5336 kb)

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, H., Meyer, C., Hu, S. et al. Refined DNase-seq protocol and data analysis reveals intrinsic bias in transcription factor footprint identification. Nat Methods 11, 73–78 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2762

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2762

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing