Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature

Two surveys of over 1,700 publications whose authors use quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) reveal a lack of transparent and comprehensive reporting of essential technical information. Reporting standards are significantly improved in publications that cite the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines, although such publications are still vastly outnumbered by those that do not.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2: Relationship between compliance with MIQE guidelines and journal impact factor (IF).
Figure 3: MIQE impact on reporting transparency.
Figure 4: MIQE impact on commercial assays used in 2012–2013 publications.

References

  1. Bustin, S.A. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 25, 169–193 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kubista, M. et al. Mol. Aspects Med. 27, 95–125 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bustin, S.A. et al. Clin. Chem. 55, 611–622 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bustin, S.A. Methods 50, 217–226 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garson, J.A. et al. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 25, 377–378 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Derveaux, S., Vandesompele, J. & Hellemans, J. Methods 50, 227–230 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scholl, C. et al. Cell 137, 821–834 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Babij, C. et al. Cancer Res. 71, 5818–5826 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ioannidis, J.P. & Khoury, M.J. Science 334, 1230–1232 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Anonymous. Nature 496, 398 (2013).

  11. Pfaffl, M.W. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huggett, J., Dheda, K., Bustin, S. & Zumla, A. Genes Immun. 6, 279–284 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vandesompele, J. et al. Genome Biol. 3, research0034 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleige, S. & Pfaffl, M.W. Mol. Aspects Med. 27, 126–139 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vermeulen, J. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e63 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bustin, S.A. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 5, 493–498 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tricarico, C. et al. Anal. Biochem. 309, 293–300 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bustin, S.A. et al. BMC Mol. Biol. 11, 74 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bustin, S. & Penning, L.C. Vet. J. 191, 279–281 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bustin, S. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 15878–15884 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bustin, S.A. et al. Clin. Chem. 57, 919–921 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Isolani, M.E. et al. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 686, 1–7 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Huggett, J. & Bustin, S.A. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 16, 399–405 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Banobi, J.A., Branch, T.A. & Hilborn, R. Ecosphere 2, art37 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Horrobin, D.F. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2, 151–154 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication is dedicated to the memory of the late Claudio Orlando, Department of Clinical Pathophysiology, University of Florence, Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen A Bustin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures, Tables and Notes

Supplementary Figures 1–8, Supplementary Tables 1–7 and Supplementary Notes 1 and 2 (PDF 504 kb)

Supplementary Data

Excel file, which has four worksheets: “2009 to 2011” containing the scores for the 2009/2011 survey, “2012 to 2013 non-MIQE” containing the scores from papers not citing the MIQE guidelines, “2012 to 2013 MIQE” containing the scores from papers citing the MIQE guidelines and “2012 to 2013 commercial” containing the scores from papers using commercial assays). (XLS 122 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bustin, S., Benes, V., Garson, J. et al. The need for transparency and good practices in the qPCR literature. Nat Methods 10, 1063–1067 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2697

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2697

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing