Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Formation of targeted monovalent quantum dots by steric exclusion

This article has been updated

Abstract

Precise control over interfacial chemistry between nanoparticles and other materials remains a major challenge that limits broad application of nanotechnology in biology. To address this challenge, we used 'steric exclusion' to completely convert commercial quantum dots (QDs) into monovalent imaging probes by wrapping each QD with a functionalized oligonucleotide. We demonstrated the utility of these QDs as modular and nonperturbing imaging probes by tracking individual Notch receptors on live cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Exclusive synthesis of small, modular mQDs by the principle of steric exclusion.
Figure 2: ptDNA-wrapped QDs are monovalent.
Figure 3: Diffusion dynamics of SNAP-Notch proteins on surfaces of live cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 24 October 2013

    In the version of this article initially published online, Figure 3c was mislabeled. The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.

References

  1. Pons, T., Medintz, I.L., Wang, X., English, D.S. & Mattoussi, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 15324–15331 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shmueli, G., Minka, T.P., Kadane, J.B., Borle, S. & Boatwright, P. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Stat. 54, 127–142 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saxton, M.J. & Jacobson, K. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 26, 373–399 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Banerjee, D., Liu, A.P., Voss, N.R., Schmid, S.L. & Finn, M.G. ChemBioChem 11, 1273–1279 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Howarth, M. et al. Nat. Methods 5, 397–399 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zanchet, D., Micheel, C.M., Parak, W.J., Gerion, D. & Alivisatos, A.P. Nano Lett. 1, 32–35 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, S. et al. Nano Lett. 10, 2147–2154 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carstairs, H.M.J., Lymperopoulos, K., Kapanidis, A.N., Bath, J. & Turberfield, A.J. ChemBioChem 10, 1781–1783 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. You, C. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 49, 4108–4112 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tikhomirov, G. et al. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 485–490 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. You, C. et al. ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 320–326 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson, R., Chen, Y. & Aveyard, J. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 1156–1157 (2004).

  13. Montenegro, J.-M. et al. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 677–688 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang, L. et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. 380, 29–33 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Claridge, S.A., Liang, H.W., Basu, S.R., Fréchet, J.M.J. & Alivisatos, A.P. Nano Lett. 8, 1202–1206 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bray, S.J. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 678–689 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gordon, W.R. et al. Blood 113, 4381–4390 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Douglass, A.D. & Vale, R.D. Cell 121, 937–950 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Triantafilou, M., Morath, S., Mackie, A., Hartung, T. & Triantafilou, K. J. Cell Sci. 117, 4007–4014 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cairo, C.W. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 11392–11401 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jana, N.R., Gearheart, L. & Murphy, C.J. Langmuir 17, 6782–6786 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grabolle, M. et al. Anal. Chem. 81, 6285–6294 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Selden, N.S. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 765–768 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. van Lengerich, L.D. Hughes and P. Haggie for assistance with single-particle-tracking software. S. Blacklow (Harvard University) provided human Notch1 constructs. R. Vale (University of California San Francisco) provided feedback on the single-molecule imaging. A.P. Alivisatos (University of California Berkeley) provided helpful discussion. J. Taunton and members of Cardiovascular Research Institute Core provided TIRF microscopes. N. Sturman helped with localization microscopy plugin. B. Liang, K. Southard and M. Todhunter generated some preliminary data. J.F. was supported by the University of California San Francisco Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology (P50 GM081879). D.S. was supported by Human Frontier Science Program Cross-disciplinary postdoc research fellowship. K.E.B. was supported by US National Institutes of Health National Research Service Award grant (5F32CA165620). Z.J.G. was supported by Kimmel Family Foundation. Y.J. was partly supported by 1R21EB015088-01 from the US National Institutes of Health NIBIB, and the Bryan Hemming Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.J.G., J.F. and Y.J. conceived the study; J.F., Z.J.G. and Y.J. designed experiments; J.F., D.S., K.E.B., M.J.T., Z.J.G. and Y.J. performed experiments; J.F. and D.S. analyzed and interpreted the data; and J.F., Z.J.G. and Y.J. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zev J Gartner or Young-wook Jun.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–24, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, and Supplementary Notes 1–4 (PDF 1580 kb)

Time lapse of SNAP proteins on supported lipid bilayers.

Timelapse TIRF movie taken of SNAP protein embeded in a supported lipid bilayer labeled with either Streptavidin QDots linked via BG-DNA-biotin, or mQDs. SNAP protein labeled with NHS-Atto488 shown to the right. Images taken at 20 Hz; scale bar is 10 μm. (AVI 19548 kb)

AF647- and mQD-labeled SNAP-Notch on a live U2OS cell.

Timelapse TIRF movie taken of SNAP.hN1 on a single cell. The cell's AF647 stained receptors were imaged for 25 seconds and immediately followed by imaging the mQD stained receptors. The AF647 & mQD regions are identical, separated by ~30 s in time. The white boxed region is shown in Figure 4c. Images taken at 20 Hz; scale bar is 1 μm. (AVI 11210 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farlow, J., Seo, D., Broaders, K. et al. Formation of targeted monovalent quantum dots by steric exclusion. Nat Methods 10, 1203–1205 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2682

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2682

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing