A database of Caenorhabditis elegans behavioral phenotypes

Nature Methods volume 10, pages877–879(2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Using low-cost automated tracking microscopes, we have generated a behavioral database for 305 Caenorhabditis elegans strains, including 76 mutants with no previously described phenotype. The growing database currently consists of 9,203 short videos segmented to extract behavior and morphology features, and these videos and feature data are available online for further analysis. The database also includes summary statistics for 702 measures with statistical comparisons to wild-type controls so that phenotypes can be identified and understood by users.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

Rent or Buy

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: The Worm Tracker 2.0 (WT2) system and phenomic database ( http://wormbehavior.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/ ).
Figure 2: Phenotypic summaries using selected features for subsets of strains.

References

  1. 1

    Ramani, A.K. et al. Cell 148, 792–802 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Houle, D., Govindaraju, D.R. & Omholt, S. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 855–866 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Husson, S.J., Costa, W.S., Schmitt, C. & Gottschalk, A. in WormBook (ed. Hobert, O.), 10.1895/wormbook.1.156.1 (2012).

  4. 4

    Hart, A.C. in WormBook (ed. Ambros, V.), 10.1895/wormbook.1.87.1 (2006).

  5. 5

    Geng, W., Cosman, P., Berry, C.C., Feng, Z. & Schafer, W.R. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51, 1811–1820 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Cronin, C.J. et al. BMC Genet. 6, 5 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Huang, K.M., Cosman, P. & Schafer, W.R. J. Neurosci. Methods 171, 153–164 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Stephens, G.J., Johnson-Kerner, B., Bialek, W. & Ryu, W.S. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000028 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Huang, K.M., Cosman, P. & Schafer, W.R. J. Neurosci. Methods 158, 323–336 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Storey, J.D. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 64, 479–498 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Starich, T.A., Xu, J., Skerrett, I.M., Nicholson, B.J. & Shaw, J.E. Neural Dev. 4, 16 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Yeh, E. et al. PLoS Biol. 6, e55 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Boulin, T. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18590–18595 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Kindt, K.S. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 568–577 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Jose, A.M., Bany, I.A., Chase, D.L. & Koelle, M.R. Genetics 175, 93–105 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Feng, Z. et al. Cell 127, 621–633 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Ghosh, R., Mohammadi, A., Kruglyak, L. & Ryu, W.S. BMC Biol. 10, 85 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Brown, A.E., Yemini, E.I., Grundy, L.J., Jucikas, T. & Schafer, W.R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 791–796 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Yemini, E., Kerr, R.A. & Schafer, W.R. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, 1475–1479 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Tsai, C.A. & Chen, J.J. Bioinformatics 25, 897–903 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Zhao, B., Khare, P., Feldman, L. & Dent, J.A. J. Neurosci. 23, 5319–5328 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    McGrath, P.T. et al. Neuron 61, 692–699 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Weber, K.P. et al. PLoS ONE 5, e13922 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Brenner, S. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Otsu, N. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cyber. 9, 62–66 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Freeman, H. IRE Trans. Electron. Comput. EC-10, 260–268 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Sulston, J.E. & Horvitz, H.R. Dev. Biol. 56, 110–156 (1977).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    White, J.G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J.N. & Brenner, S. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 314, 1–340 (1986).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Alkema, M.J., Hunter-Ensor, M., Ringstad, N. & Horvitz, H.R. Neuron 46, 247–260 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Cronin and P. Sternberg for providing the code from their single-worm tracker, which serves as the basis for elements of our WT2 analysis GUI and phenotypic features cited from their publication; J. Lasenby and N. Kingsbury for guidance in computer vision; A. Deonarine for useful discussions; and R. Samworth, S. Chavali, G. Chalancon, S. Teichmann and M. Babu for guidance in statistics and bioinformatics techniques. This project was funded by grants to W.R.S. from the MRC (MC-A022-5PB91) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse, US National Institutes of Health (DA018341), a Gates Cambridge Scholarship (to E.Y.) and a long-term fellowship from the Human Frontier Science Program (to A.E.X.B.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK

    Eviatar Yemini, Tadas Jucikas, Laura J Grundy, André E X Brown & William R Schafer

Authors
  1. Eviatar Yemini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tadas Jucikas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laura J Grundy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. André E X Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. William R Schafer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.Y. created the WT2 system (hardware and software), analyzed data and wrote the paper. T.J. developed the WT2 analysis pipeline and built the online database. L.J.G. conducted all experiments. A.E.X.B. analyzed data, supervised research and wrote the paper. W.R.S. designed experiments, supervised research and wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to André E X Brown or William R Schafer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–6 and Supplementary Note (PDF 2058 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Supplementary Data Set (XLSX 19 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Supplementary Data Set (XLSX 45 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Supplementary Data Set (XLSX 48 kb)

Supplementary Table 4

Supplementary Data Set (XLSX 42 kb)

Supplementary Table 5

Supplementary Data Set (XLSX 6853 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yemini, E., Jucikas, T., Grundy, L. et al. A database of Caenorhabditis elegans behavioral phenotypes. Nat Methods 10, 877–879 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2560

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing