Commentary | Published:

Proteomics meets the scientific method

Nature Methods volume 10, pages 2427 (2013) | Download Citation

By delivering precise, reproducible quantification of proteins of interest in biological samples, targeted proteomics approaches are allowing researchers to apply the scientific method using mass spectrometry.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    J. Biol. Chem. 69, 435–441 (1926).

  2. 2.

    et al. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).

  3. 3.

    & Nature 422, 198–207 (2003).

  4. 4.

    et al. Nat. Methods 4, 231–237 (2007).

  5. 5.

    et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6940–6945 (2003).

  6. 6.

    et al. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376–386 (2002).

  7. 7.

    et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 994–999 (1999).

  8. 8.

    & Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13, 414–420 (2009).

  9. 9.

    et al. Nature 455, 1251–1254 (2008).

  10. 10.

    et al. Nature 470, 163–165 (2011).

  11. 11.

    & Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 573–588 (2006).

  12. 12.

    & Nat. Methods 9, 555–566 (2012).

  13. 13.

    et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 653–658 (2011).

  14. 14.

    et al. Nat. Methods 7, 43–46 (2010).

  15. 15.

    et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5860–5865 (2007).

  16. 16.

    et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2444–2449 (2011).

  17. 17.

    et al. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 464 (2011).

  18. 18.

    et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 633–641 (2009).

  19. 19.

    et al. Cell 138, 795–806 (2009).

  20. 20.

    et al. Proteomics 12, 1185–1193 (2012).

  21. 21.

    et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2444–2449 (2011).

  22. 22.

    et al. Nature (in the press).

  23. 23.

    et al. Plant J. 60, 1015–1030 (2009).

  24. 24.

    et al. J. Proteomics 75, 4747–4757 (2012).

  25. 25.

    et al. J. Proteome Res. 9, 4215–4227 (2010).

  26. 26.

    et al. Mol. Syst. Biol. (in the press).

  27. 27.

    et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 625–634 (2011).

  28. 28.

    et al. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 2339–2349 (2009).

  29. 29.

    , et al. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, O111.016717 (2012).

  30. 30.

    et al. Mol. Cell. Proteomics published online, doi:10.1074/mcp.O112.019802 (7 September 2012).

  31. 31.

    et al. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 1475–1488 (2012).

  32. 32.

    , & Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 383–414 (2008).

  33. 33.

    et al. Nat. Methods 4, 828–833 (2007).

  34. 34.

    et al. Science 332, 687–696 (2011).

  35. 35.

    et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 858–867 (2012).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Paola Picotti is the Department of Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

    • Paola Picotti
  2. Bernd Bodenmiller is at the Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

    • Bernd Bodenmiller
  3. Ruedi Aebersold is in the Department of Biology, Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH Zurich and the Faculty of Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

    • Ruedi Aebersold

Authors

  1. Search for Paola Picotti in:

  2. Search for Bernd Bodenmiller in:

  3. Search for Ruedi Aebersold in:

Competing interests

P.P. and R.A. hold shares of the company BioGnosys, which operates in the field covered by the article. The research group of R.A. is supported by the company AB/Sciex and receives access to prototype instrumentation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruedi Aebersold.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2291

Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing