Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Targeted gene deletions in C. elegans using transposon excision

This article has been updated

Abstract

We developed a method, MosDEL, to generate targeted knockouts of genes in Caenorhabditis elegans by injection. We generated a double-strand break by mobilizing a Mos1 transposon adjacent to the region to be deleted; the double-stranded break is repaired using injected DNA as a template. Repair can delete up to 25 kb of DNA and simultaneously insert a positive selection marker.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Using Mos1 transposons to create targeted deletions.
Figure 2: Deleting lethal genes and multiple similar genes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 06 May 2010

    In the version of this article initially published online, the statement that MosDEL can delete 10,069 of 10,154 genes presently lacking a deletion allele was an underestimate; 15,072 of the 15,157 genes presently lacking a publicly available deletion allele can be deleted by MosDEL. Also, the species origin of the Mos1 transposon was incorrect and the abbreviation for Mos1 excision-induced transgene-instructed gene conversion was incorrect. These errors have been corrected online for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.

References

  1. Moerman, D.G. & Barstead, R.J. Brief. Funct. Genomics Proteomics 7, 195–204 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pontier, D.B., Kruisselbrink, E., Guryev, V. & Tijsterman, M. Nat. Methods 6, 655–657 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gengyo-Ando, K. & Mitani, S. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 269, 64–69 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryder, E. et al. Genetics 177, 615–629 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berezikov, E., Bargmann, C.I. & Plasterk, R.H.A. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e40 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zwaal, R.R., Broeks, A., van Meurs, J., Groenen, J.T. & Plasterk, R.H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7431–7435 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Robert, V. & Bessereau, J. EMBO J. 26, 170–183 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bazopoulou, D. & Tavernarakis, N. Genetica 137, 39–46 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Plasterk, R.H. & Groenen, J.T. EMBO J. 11, 287–290 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frøkjaer-Jensen, C. et al. Nat. Genet. 40, 1375–1383 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gloor, G.B., Nassif, N.A., Johnson-Schlitz, D.M., Preston, C.R. & Engels, W.R. Science 253, 1110–1117 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maydan, J.S. et al. Genome Res. 17, 337–347 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Keeler, K.J., Dray, T., Penney, J.E. & Gloor, G.B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 522–528 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bessereau, J.L. et al. Nature 413, 70–74 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris, T.W. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 463–467 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Segalat (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Lyon, France) and members of the NemaGENETAG consortium for Mos1 strains. C.F.-J. is funded by a fellowship from the Lundbeck Foundation and G.H. by a Jane Coffin Childs fellowship funded by Howard Hughes Medical Institute. M.B. is funded by a McKnight Grant. D.G.M. is funded by Genome Canada and Genome British Columbia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.F.-J., M.W.D., G.H. and E.M.J. conceived and designed experiments; C.F.-J., G.H., J.T., P.N., R.L. and M.P.-D. performed experiments; T.W.H. performed the bioinformatic analysis of Mos1 distribution; M.B., D.G.M. and E.M.J. provided supervision and funding; C.F.-J. and E.M.J. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik M Jorgensen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

E.M.J. is the author of a patent covering techniques described in this paper (US patent 7,196,244 and European patent pending). T.W.H. is the sole proprietor of Hi-Line Informatics.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–2 and Supplementary Tables 1,3 (PDF 1698 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Mos1 distribution. (XLS 12467 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frøkjær-Jensen, C., Davis, M., Hollopeter, G. et al. Targeted gene deletions in C. elegans using transposon excision. Nat Methods 7, 451–453 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1454

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1454

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing