Article | Published:

Adaptive optics via pupil segmentation for high-resolution imaging in biological tissues

Nature Methods volume 7, pages 141147 (2010) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Biological specimens are rife with optical inhomogeneities that seriously degrade imaging performance under all but the most ideal conditions. Measuring and then correcting for these inhomogeneities is the province of adaptive optics. Here we introduce an approach to adaptive optics in microscopy wherein the rear pupil of an objective lens is segmented into subregions, and light is directed individually to each subregion to measure, by image shift, the deflection faced by each group of rays as they emerge from the objective and travel through the specimen toward the focus. Applying our method to two-photon microscopy, we could recover near-diffraction–limited performance from a variety of biological and nonbiological samples exhibiting aberrations large or small and smoothly varying or abruptly changing. In particular, results from fixed mouse cortical slices illustrate our ability to improve signal and resolution to depths of 400 μm.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Advances in the speed and resolution of light microscopy. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18, 605–616 (2008).

  2. 2.

    & Experimental test of an analytical model of aberration in an oil-immersion objective lens used in three-dimensional light microscopy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 8, 1601–1613 (1991).

  3. 3.

    et al. Computational adaptive optics for live three-dimensional biological imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3790–3795 (2001).

  4. 4.

    et al. Measurement of specimen-induced aberrations of biological samples using phase stepping interferometry. J. Microsc. 213, 11–19 (2004).

  5. 5.

    , & Characterizing specimen induced aberrations for high NA adaptive optical microscopy. Opt. Express 12, 6540–6552 (2004).

  6. 6.

    Adaptive optics revisited. Science 249, 253–257 (1990).

  7. 7.

    Principles of adaptive optics (Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, 1991).

  8. 8.

    Adaptive optics in microscopy. Philos. Transact. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 365, 2829–2843 (2007).

  9. 9.

    , & Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 14, 2884–2892 (1997).

  10. 10.

    , & Adaptive wavefront correction in two-photon microscopy using coherence-gated wavefront sensing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17137–17142 (2006).

  11. 11.

    et al. Odd aberrations and double-pass measurements of retinal image quality. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 12, 195–201 (1995).

  12. 12.

    et al. eds. Adaptive optics for vision science (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2006).

  13. 13.

    & Principles of Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999).

  14. 14.

    Introduction to Fourier optics 3rd ed. (Roberts & Company Publishers, Englewood, Colorado, USA, 2005).

  15. 15.

    & Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems. II. structure of the image field in an aplanatic system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 253, 358–379 (1959).

  16. 16.

    & Wave-front interpretation with Zernike polynomials. Appl. Opt. 19, 1510–1518 (1980).

  17. 17.

    et al. Adaptive optics with a magnetic deformable mirror: applications in the human eye. Opt. Express 14, 8900–8917 (2006).

  18. 18.

    et al. Characterisation of MEMs mirrors for use in atmospheric and ocular wavefront correction. Proc. SPIE 6888, 688802 (2008).

  19. 19.

    & Zonal matrix iterative method for wavefront reconstruction from gradient measurements. J. Refract. Surg. 21, S563–S569 (2005).

  20. 20.

    Wave-front estimation from wave-front slope measurements. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 70, 998–1006 (1980).

  21. 21.

    et al. Adaptive aberration correction in a two-photon microscope. J. Microsc. 200, 105–108 (2000).

  22. 22.

    et al. Adaptive aberration correction in a confocal microscope. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5788–5792 (2002).

  23. 23.

    , & New modal wave-front sensor: application to adaptive confocal fluorescence microscopy and two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 19, 2112–2120 (2002).

  24. 24.

    et al. Adaptive optics for structured illumination microscopy. Opt. Express 16, 9290–9305 (2008).

  25. 25.

    et al. Image-based adaptive optics for two-photon microscopy. Opt. Lett. 34, 2495–2497 (2009).

  26. 26.

    Wavefront sensorless adaptive optics for large aberrations. Opt. Lett. 32, 5–7 (2007).

  27. 27.

    , & Image based adaptive optics through optimisation of low spatial frequencies. Opt. Express 15, 8176–8190 (2007).

  28. 28.

    Adaptive Optics for Astronomical Telescopes (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1998).

  29. 29.

    , & Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. Biophys. J. 82, 2775–2783 (2002).

  30. 30.

    et al. Two-photon microscopy in brain tissue: parameters influencing the imaging depth. J. Neurosci. Methods 111, 29–37 (2001).

  31. 31.

    & Aberration compensation in confocal microscopy. Appl. Opt. 30, 3563–3568 (1991).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our colleagues at Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, B. Shields, A. Hu, W. Amir, R. Kerr, J. Truman, M. Hooks andJ. Makara for help with sample preparation, J. Osborne and S. Bassin for help with machining and T. Sato and T. Planchon for helpful discussions.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.

    • Na Ji
    •  & Eric Betzig
  2. Coleman Technologies, Inc., Unit 113, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania, USA.

    • Daniel E Milkie

Authors

  1. Search for Na Ji in:

  2. Search for Daniel E Milkie in:

  3. Search for Eric Betzig in:

Contributions

N.J. and E.B. designed the project; N.J., D.E.M. and E.B. developed the instrument control program; N.J. performed the experiments; and N.J. and E.B. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Na Ji.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1–18

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Movie 1

    Spatial light modulator patterns (right) and resulting images (left) acquired during implementation of our pupil segmentation based AO algorithm with independent subregion masks and direct phase measurement.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Movie 2

    Rotating three-dimensional view of integrated intensity projections from a field of 500-nm-diameter fluorescent beads in water before (4× display gain) and after correction for system aberration.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Movie 3

    Rotating three-dimensional view of integrated intensity projections from a field of 500-nm-diameter fluorescent beads in air before (7× display gain) and after AO correction.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1411

Further reading