Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Tissue tectonics: morphogenetic strain rates, cell shape change and intercalation

Abstract

The dynamic reshaping of tissues during morphogenesis results from a combination of individual cell behaviors and collective cell rearrangements. However, a comprehensive framework to unambiguously measure and link cell behavior to tissue morphogenesis is lacking. Here we introduce such a kinematic framework, bridging cell and tissue behaviors at an intermediate, mesoscopic, level of cell clusters or domains. By measuring domain deformation in terms of the relative motion of cell positions and the evolution of their shapes, we characterized the basic invariant quantities that measure fundamental classes of cell behavior, namely tensorial rates of cell shape change and cell intercalation. In doing so we introduce an explicit definition of cell intercalation as a continuous process. We mapped strain rates spatiotemporally in three models of tissue morphogenesis, gaining insight into morphogenetic mechanisms. Our quantitative approach has broad relevance for the precise characterization and comparison of morphogenetic phenotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Measuring tissue strain rates in simulated data.
Figure 2: Cellular simulations of tissue morphogenesis.
Figure 3: Measuring strain rates for a domain of zebrafish neuroectoderm.
Figure 4: Tissue, cell shape and intercalation strain rate patterns in Drosophila and zebrafish ectoderm.
Figure 5: Patterns in data pooled from multiple embryos.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keller, R. et al. Mechanisms of convergence and extension by cell intercalation. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 355, 897–922 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertet, C., Sulak, L. & Lecuit, T. Myosin-dependent junction remodelling controls planar cell intercalation and axis elongation. Nature 429, 667–671 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Concha, M.L. & Adams, R.J. Oriented cell divisions and cellular morphogenesis in the zebrafish gastrula and neurula: a time-lapse analysis. Development 125, 983–994 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Neumann, M. & Affolter, M. Remodelling epithelial tubes through cell rearrangements: from cells to molecules. EMBO Rep. 7, 36–40 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutson, M.S. et al. Forces for morphogenesis investigated with laser microsurgery and quantitative modelling. Science 300, 145–149 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore, S.W., Keller, R.E. & Koehl, M.A.R. The dorsal involuting marginal zone stiffens anisotropically during its convergent extension in the gastrula of Xenopus laevis. Development 121, 3131–3140 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keller, R., Shook, D. & Skogland, P. The forces that shape embryos: physical aspects of convergent extension by cell intercalation. Phys. Biol. 5, 15007 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. England, S.J., Blanchard, G.B., Mahadevan, L. & Adams, R.J. A dynamic fate map of the forebrain shows how vertebrate eyes form and explains two causes of cyclopia. Development 133, 4613–4617 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Keller, P.J., Schmidt, A.D., Wittbrodt, J. & Stelzer, E.H.K. Reconstruction of zebrafish early embryonic development by scanned light sheet microscopy. Science 322, 1065–1069 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Graner, F., Dollet, B., Raufaste, C. & Marmottant, P. Discrete rearranging disordered patterns, part I: Robust statistical tools in two or three dimensions. Eur. Phys. J. E 25, 349–369 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fung, Y.C. & Tong, P. Classical and Computational Solid Mechanics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001).

  12. Glickman, N.S., Kimmel, C.B., Jones, M.A. & Adams, R.J. Shaping the zebrafish notochord. Development 130, 873–887 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yin, C. et al. Cooperation of polarized cell intercalations drives convergence and extension of presomitic mesoderm during zebrafish gastrulation. J. Cell Biol. 180, 221–232 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weaire, D. & Hutzler, S. The Physics of Foams (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).

  15. Farhadifar, R. et al. The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing. Curr. Biol. 17, 2095–2104 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hilgenfeldt, S., Erisken, S. & Carthew, R.W. Physical modeling of cell geometric order in an epithelial tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 907–911 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacinto, A., Woolner, S. & Martin, P. Dynamic analysis of dorsal closure in Drosophila: from genetics to cell biology. Dev. Cell 3, 9–19 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kiehart, D.P. et al. Multiple forces contribute to cell sheet morphogenesis for dorsal closure in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 149, 471–490 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandez, B.G., Arias, A.M. & Jacinto, A. Dpp signalling orchestrates dorsal closure by regulating cell shape changes both in the amnioserosa and in the epidermis. Mech. Dev. 124, 884–897 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Irvine, K.D. & Weischaus, E. Cell intercalation during Drosophila germband extension and its regulation by pair-rule segmentation genes. Development 120, 827–841 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blankenship, J.T. et al. Multicellular rosette formation links planar cell polarity to tissue morphogenesis. Dev. Cell 11, 459–470 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Butler, L.C. et al. Cell shape changes indicate a role for extrinsic tensile forces in Drosophila germband extension. Nat. Cell Biol. (in the press).

  23. Keller, R., Shih, J. & Sater, A. The cellular basis of the convergence and extension of the Xenopus neural plate. Dev. Dyn. 193, 199–217 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hong, E. & Brewster, R. N-cadherin is required for the polarized cell behaviors that drive neurulation in the zebrafish. Development 133, 3895–3905 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pope, K.L. & Harris, T.J. Control of cell flattening and junctional remodelling during squamous epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila. Development 135, 2227–2238 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gorfinkiel, N., Blanchard, G.B., Adams, R.J. & Arias, A.M. Mechanical control of global cell behaviour during dorsal closure in Drosophila. Development (in the press).

  27. Allmendinger, R.W., Relinger, R. & Loveless, J. Strain and rotation rate from GPS in Tibet, Anatolia, and the Altiplano. Tectonics 26, TC3013 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. & Vetterling, W.T. Numerical Recipes in C (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988).

  29. Aubouy, M., Jiang, Y., Glazier, J.A. & Graner, F. A texture tensor to quantify deformations. Granular Matter 5, 67–70 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Draper, N.R. & Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis 3rd edition (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1998).

  31. Oda, H. & Tsukita, S. Real-time imaging of cell-cell adherens junctions reveals that Drosophila mesoderm invagination begins with two phases of apical constriction of cells. J. Cell Sci. 114, 493–501 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Campos-Ortega, J.-A. & Hartenstein, V. The Embryonic Development of Drosophila melanogaster (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial support from the Medical Research Council (R.J.A.) and the Harvard Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (L.M.). Additional financial support was from a Wellcome Trust studentship to N.L.S. (zebrafish trunk studies); a Human Frontier Science Program grant to B.S. and a Wellcome Trust studentship to L.C.B. (Drosophila germband extension studies); and a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council grant to Alfonso Martinez Arias and N.G. (Drosophila dorsal closure studies). We thank N.J. Lawrence, who initiated Drosophila germband extension imaging, S.J. England and S.R. Young for fruitful discussions. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Locke G. Nolan Blanchard.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.B.B., A.J.K., L.M. and R.J.A. conceived and developed the project and wrote the manuscript. G.B.B. and A.J.K. analyzed data and developed the code. N.L.S. (zebrafish trunk), L.C.B., B.S. (Drosophila germband extension) and N.G. (Drosophila dorsal closure) all collaborated to develop the analyses and contributed time-lapse movies and expertise on their models.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to L Mahadevan or Richard J Adams.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–4, Supplementary Note (PDF 974 kb)

Supplementary Software

Zip file of code written in IDL for calculating strain rates in a domain of tissue. (ZIP 8 kb)

Supplementary Video 1

Tracked cell trajectories and membrane shapes in Drosophila amnioserosa. Video to accompany Figure 4a. Video duration is 50 min, with frames at 2 min intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 198 kb)

Supplementary Video 2

Tracked cell trajectories and membrane shapes in Drosophila germband. Video to accompany Figure 4i. Video duration is 15 mins, with frames at 30s intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 576 kb)

Supplementary Video 3

Tracked cell trajectories and membrane shapes in zebrafish trunk ectoderm. Video to accompany Figure 4q. Video duration is 50 mins, with frames at 2 min intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 590 kb)

Supplementary Video 4

Cellular simulation of a domain dominated by cell shape change. Video to accompany Figure 2a simulation. Video duration is 50 mins, with frames every minute. (MOV 38 kb)

Supplementary Video 5

Cellular simulation of a domain dominated by cell intercalation. Video to accompany Figure 2b simulation. Video duration is 50 mins, with frames every minute. (MOV 37 kb)

Supplementary Video 6

Tissue deformations and rotations in Drosophila amnioserosa. Video to accompany Figure 4c. Video duration is 50 mins, with frames at 2 min intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 114 kb)

Supplementary Video 7

Cell shape deformations in Drosophila amnioserosa. Video to accompany Figure 4e. Video duration is 50 mins, with frames at 2 min intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 110 kb)

Supplementary Video 8

Cell intercalation deformations in Drosophila amnioserosa. Video to accompany Figure 4g. Video duration is 50 mins, with frames at 2 min intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 45 kb)

Supplementary Video 9

Tissue deformations and rotations in Drosophila germband. Video to accompany Figure 4k. Video duration is 15 mins, with frames at 30s intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 425 kb)

Supplementary Video 10

Cell shape deformations in Drosophila germband. Video to accompany Figure 4m. Video duration is 15 mins, with frames at 30s intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 313 kb)

Supplementary Video 11

Cell intercalation deformations in Drosophila germband. Video to accompany Figure 4o. Video duration is 15 mins, with frames at 30s intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 325 kb)

Supplementary Video 12

Tissue deformations and rotations in zebrafish trunk ectoderm. Video to accompany Figure 4s. Video duration is 50 mins, with frames at 2 min intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 297 kb)

Supplementary Video 13

Cell shape deformations in zebrafish trunk ectoderm. Video to accompany Figure 4u. Video duration is 50 mins, with frames at 2 min intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 231 kb)

Supplementary Video 14

Cell intercalation deformations in zebrafish trunk ectoderm. Video to accompany Figure 4w. Video duration is 50 mins, with frames at 2 min intervals. Details are as in Figure 4. (MOV 232 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blanchard, G., Kabla, A., Schultz, N. et al. Tissue tectonics: morphogenetic strain rates, cell shape change and intercalation. Nat Methods 6, 458–464 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1327

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1327

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing