Letter

Ultrathin graphene-based membrane with precise molecular sieving and ultrafast solvent permeation

Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) membranes continue to attract intense interest due to their unique molecular sieving properties combined with fast permeation1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. However, their use is limited to aqueous solutions because GO membranes appear impermeable to organic solvents1, a phenomenon not yet fully understood. Here, we report efficient and fast filtration of organic solutions through GO laminates containing smooth two-dimensional (2D) capillaries made from large (10–20 μm) flakes. Without modification of sieving characteristics, these membranes can be made exceptionally thin, down to 10 nm, which translates into fast water and organic solvent permeation. We attribute organic solvent permeation and sieving properties to randomly distributed pinholes interconnected by short graphene channels with a width of 1 nm. With increasing membrane thickness, organic solvent permeation rates decay exponentially but water continues to permeate quickly, in agreement with previous reports1,2,3,4. The potential of ultrathin GO laminates for organic solvent nanofiltration is demonstrated by showing >99.9% rejection of small molecular weight organic dyes dissolved in methanol. Our work significantly expands possibilities for the use of GO membranes in purification and filtration technologies.

  • Subscribe to Nature Materials for full access:

    $59

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , & Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak-tight graphene-based membranes. Science 335, 442–444 (2012).

  2. 2.

    , & Recent developments in graphene-based membranes: structure, mass-transport mechanism and potential applications. Adv. Mater. 28, 2287–2310 (2016).

  3. 3.

    , & Graphene-based membranes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 5016–5030 (2015).

  4. 4.

    , , , & Graphene oxide: a novel 2-dimensional material in membrane separation for water purification. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 4, 1600918 (2017).

  5. 5.

    et al. Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes. Science 343, 752–754 (2014).

  6. 6.

    et al. Ultrathin, molecular-sieving graphene oxide membranes for selective hydrogen separation. Science 342, 95–98 (2013).

  7. 7.

    et al. Large-area graphene-based nanofiltration membranes by shear alignment of discotic nematic liquid crystals of graphene oxide. Nat. Commun. 7, 10891 (2016).

  8. 8.

    et al. Tuneable sieving of ions using graphene oxide membranes. Nat. Nanotech. 12, 546–550 (2017).

  9. 9.

    et al. Scalable graphene-based membranes for ionic sieving with ultrahigh charge selectivity. Nano Lett. 17, 728–732 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Basic Principles of Membrane Technology (Springer Science & Business Media, 2017).

  11. 11.

    & Materials for next-generation molecularly selective synthetic membranes. Nat. Mater. 16, 289–297 (2017).

  12. 12.

    et al. Molecular valves for controlling gas phase transport made from discrete ångström-sized pores in graphene. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 785–790 (2015).

  13. 13.

    et al. Heterogeneous sub-continuum ionic transport in statistically isolated graphene nanopores. Nat. Nanotech. 10, 1053–1057 (2015).

  14. 14.

    et al. Ultimate permeation across atomically thin porous graphene. Science 344, 289–292 (2014).

  15. 15.

    , & Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 3693–3700 (2013).

  16. 16.

    , , & Molecular separation with organic solvent nanofiltration: a critical review. Chem. Rev. 114, 10735–10806 (2014).

  17. 17.

    , & Solvent resistant nanofiltration: separating on a molecular level. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 365–405 (2008).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Polymer nanofilms with enhanced microporosity by interfacial polymerization. Nat. Mater. 15, 760–767 (2016).

  19. 19.

    , & Sub–10 nm polyamide nanofilms with ultrafast solvent transport for molecular separation. Science 348, 1347–1351 (2015).

  20. 20.

    et al. A graphene oxide membrane with highly selective molecular separation of aqueous organic solution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 6929–6932 (2014).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Graphene oxide membranes with tunable semipermeability in organic solvents. Adv. Mater. 27, 3797–3802 (2015).

  22. 22.

    , , , & Graphene oxide membranes on ceramic hollow fibers—microstructural stability and nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 484, 87–94 (2015).

  23. 23.

    et al. Reduced graphene oxide membranes for ultrafast organic solvent nanofiltration. Adv. Mater. 28, 8669–8674 (2016).

  24. 24.

    et al. Fabrication of highly-aligned, conductive, and strong graphene papers using ultralarge graphene oxide sheets. ACS Nano 6, 10708–10719 (2012).

  25. 25.

    , , & Commensurate adsorption of hydrocarbons and alcohols in microporous metal organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 112, 836–868 (2012).

  26. 26.

    et al. Massive radius-dependent flow slippage in carbon nanotubes. Nature 537, 210–213 (2016).

  27. 27.

    et al. Molecular transport through capillaries made with atomic-scale precision. Nature 538, 222–225 (2016).

  28. 28.

    et al. Graphene oxide: structural analysis and application as a highly transparent support for electron microscopy. ACS Nano 3, 2547–2556 (2009).

  29. 29.

    , , & Graphene oxide as a chemically tunable platform for optical applications. Nat. Chem. 2, 1015–1024 (2010).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Interfacial friction of ethanol–water mixtures in graphene pores. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 20, 141 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Royal Society, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK (EP/K016946/1), Lloyd’s Register Foundation, and European Research Council (contract 679689). Q.Y. acknowledges support from the China Scholarship Council. We thank P. Bentley for assisting with XPS measurements, J. Waters for X-ray measurements, and K. Huang for assisting in setting up the cold trap for filtration experiments.

Author information

Author notes

    • Q. Yang
    • , Y. Su
    •  & C. Chi

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. National Graphene Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

    • Q. Yang
    • , Y. Su
    • , C. Chi
    • , C. T. Cherian
    • , K. Huang
    •  & R. R. Nair
  2. School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

    • Q. Yang
    • , Y. Su
    • , C. Chi
    • , C. T. Cherian
    • , K. Huang
    •  & R. R. Nair
  3. School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

    • Q. Yang
    • , V. G. Kravets
    • , A. N. Grigorenko
    • , F. Guinea
    •  & A. K. Geim
  4. Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials (Ministry of Education), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China

    • Q. Yang
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230027, China

    • F. C. Wang
  6. Department of Physics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK

    • J. C. Zhang
    •  & A. Pratt
  7. Imdea Nanociencia, Faraday 9, 28015 Madrid, Spain

    • F. Guinea

Authors

  1. Search for Q. Yang in:

  2. Search for Y. Su in:

  3. Search for C. Chi in:

  4. Search for C. T. Cherian in:

  5. Search for K. Huang in:

  6. Search for V. G. Kravets in:

  7. Search for F. C. Wang in:

  8. Search for J. C. Zhang in:

  9. Search for A. Pratt in:

  10. Search for A. N. Grigorenko in:

  11. Search for F. Guinea in:

  12. Search for A. K. Geim in:

  13. Search for R. R. Nair in:

Contributions

R.R.N. and Y.S. designed and supervised the project. Q.Y., Y.S. and C.C prepared the samples, performed the measurements and carried out the analysis with help from R.R.N. C.T.C. and K.H. helped in sample preparation, characterization and data analysis. J.C.Z. and A.P. contributed to XPS characterization. V.G.K. and A.N.G. contributed to optical measurements. F.G., F.C.W. and A.K.G. contributed to theoretical modelling. Y.S., A.N.G., A.K.G. and R.R.N. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to discussions.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Y. Su or R. R. Nair.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary movie 1