Article | Published:

Multiscale metallic metamaterials

Nature Materials volume 15, pages 11001106 (2016) | Download Citation

  • An Addendum to this article was published on 27 March 2017

Abstract

Materials with three-dimensional micro- and nanoarchitectures exhibit many beneficial mechanical, energy conversion and optical properties. However, these three-dimensional microarchitectures are significantly limited by their scalability. Efforts have only been successful only in demonstrating overall structure sizes of hundreds of micrometres, or contain size-scale gaps of several orders of magnitude. This results in degraded mechanical properties at the macroscale. Here we demonstrate hierarchical metamaterials with disparate three-dimensional features spanning seven orders of magnitude, from nanometres to centimetres. At the macroscale they achieve high tensile elasticity (>20%) not found in their brittle-like metallic constituents, and a near-constant specific strength. Creation of these materials is enabled by a high-resolution, large-area additive manufacturing technique with scalability not achievable by two-photon polymerization or traditional stereolithography. With overall part sizes approaching tens of centimetres, these unique nanostructured metamaterials might find use in a broad array of applications.

  • Subscribe to Nature Materials for full access:

    $59

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Change history

  • Corrected online 07 March 2017

    In the version of this Article originally published, Fig. 3e used data from ref. 3 that has since been corrected. The Al2O3 nanolattice dataset has been corrected to reflect this. In addition, the Al2O3 hollowtube dataset from ref. 14 has been added to the plot. These changes do not affect the data or findings of the present study.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Approaching theoretical strength in glassy carbon nanolattices. Nature Mater. 15, 438–443 (2016).

  2. 2.

    , , & Fabrication and deformation of three-dimensional hollow ceramic nanostructures. Nature Mater. 12, 893–898 (2013).

  3. 3.

    , & Strong, lightweight, and recoverable three-dimensional ceramic nanolattices. Science 345, 1322–1326 (2014).

  4. 4.

    et al. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 344, 1373–1377 (2014).

  5. 5.

    , & Three-dimensional bicontinuous ultrafast-charge and -discharge bulk battery electrodes. Nature Nanotech. 6, 277–281 (2011).

  6. 6.

    et al. Graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems for energy conversion and storage. Science 347, (2015).

  7. 7.

    & Past achievements and future challenges in the development of three-dimensional photonic metamaterials. Nature Photon. 5, 523–530 (2011).

  8. 8.

    et al. A 3D optical metamaterial made by self-assembly. Adv. Mater. 24, Op23–Op27 (2012).

  9. 9.

    et al. Design and optimization of a light-emitting diode projection micro-stereolithography three-dimensional manufacturing system. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 125001 (2012).

  10. 10.

    , , , & High-strength cellular ceramic composites with 3D microarchitecture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2453–2458 (2014).

  11. 11.

    et al. Proc. IEEE 27th Int. Conf. Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) 510–513 (IEEE, 2014).

  12. 12.

    et al. Push-to-pull tensile testing of ultra-strong nanoscale ceramic–polymer composites made by additive manufacturing. Extreme Mech. Lett. 3, 105–112 (2015).

  13. 13.

    , , & Mechanical cloak design by direct lattice transformation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4930–4934 (2015).

  14. 14.

    et al. Resilient 3D hierarchical architected metamaterials. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11502–11507 (2015).

  15. 15.

    et al. Gold Helix photonic metamaterial as broadband circular polarizer. Science 325, 1513–1515 (2009).

  16. 16.

    et al. Metamaterial electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies. Science 314, 977–980 (2006).

  17. 17.

    & Complete light absorption in graphene-metamaterial corrugated structures. Phys. Rev. B 86, 205401 (2012).

  18. 18.

    et al. 3D printing of interdigitated Li-ion microbattery architectures. Adv. Mater. 25, 4539–4543 (2013).

  19. 19.

    et al. Assembly of micro/nanomaterials into complex, three-dimensional architectures by compressive buckling. Science 347, 154–159 (2015).

  20. 20.

    et al. Omnidirectional printing of flexible, stretchable, and spanning silver microelectrodes. Science 323, 1590–1593 (2009).

  21. 21.

    et al. Ultralight metallic microlattices. Science 334, 962–965 (2011).

  22. 22.

    , , , & Biomimetic superelastic graphene-based cellular monoliths. Nature Commun. 3, 1241 (2012).

  23. 23.

    et al. Microlattices as architected thin films: analysis of mechanical properties and high strain elastic recovery. APL Mater. 1, 022106 (2013).

  24. 24.

    , & Ultralight fractal structures from hollow tubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 204301 (2012).

  25. 25.

    et al. Ultra-strong and low-density nanotubular bulk materials with tunable feature sizes. Adv. Mater. 26, 4808–4813 (2014).

  26. 26.

    & Transparent ultralow-density silica aerogels prepared by a 2-step sol-gel process. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 145, 44–50 (1992).

  27. 27.

    et al. Super-compressibility of ultralow-density nanoporous silica. Adv. Mater. 24, 776–780 (2012).

  28. 28.

    , , , & Characterization of nickel-based microlattice materials with structural hierarchy from the nanometer to the millimeter scale. Acta Mater. 60, 3511–3523 (2012).

  29. 29.

    , & Brittle intermetallic compound makes ultrastrong low-density steel with large ductility. Nature 518, 77–79 (2015).

  30. 30.

    The properties of foams and lattices. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 364, 15–30 (2006).

  31. 31.

    Materials with structural hierarchy. Nature 361, 511–515 (1993).

  32. 32.

    , & Hierarchical corrugated core sandwich panel concepts. J. Appl. Mech. 74, 259–268 (2005).

  33. 33.

    , , , & Optimal fractal-like hierarchical honeycombs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 104301 (2014).

  34. 34.

    , & Optimization of fractal space frames under gentle compressive load. Phys. Rev. E. 87, 063204 (2013).

  35. 35.

    , & Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med. Eng. Phys. 20, 92–102 (1998).

  36. 36.

    The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nature Mater. 10, 817–822 (2011).

  37. 37.

    Chemist’s wood. Nature 310, 521 (1984).

  38. 38.

    et al. In situ atomic-scale observation of continuous and reversible lattice deformation beyond the elastic limit. Nature Commun. 4, 2413 (2013).

  39. 39.

    et al. Fabrication and deformation of metallic glass micro-lattices. Adv. Eng. Mater. 16, 889–896 (2014).

  40. 40.

    , & Crystallisation kinetics and phase transformation behaviour of electroless nickel–phosphorus deposits with high phosphorus content. J. Alloys Compd. 334, 192–199 (2002).

  41. 41.

    , & Mechanical response of Ti-6Al-4V octet-truss lattice structures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 60–61, 107–124 (2015).

  42. 42.

    , , , & Compressive strength of hollow microlattices: experimental characterization, modeling, and optimal design. J. Mater. Res. 28, 2461–2473 (2013).

  43. 43.

    , & Multifunctional, ultra-flyweight, synergistically assembled carbon aerogels. Adv. Mater. 25, 2554–2560 (2013).

  44. 44.

    et al. Cytocompatibility and mechanical properties of novel porous 316 L stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 33, 2736–2743 (2013).

  45. 45.

    , & Deformation and fracture of aluminium foams. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 291, 136–146 (2000).

  46. 46.

    , & Compressive and tensile behaviour of aluminum foams. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 270, 113–124 (1999).

  47. 47.

    et al. Fracture toughness of titanium foams for medical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527, 7689–7693 (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Funding support from DOE LDRD LabWide 15-LW-083, Virginia Tech Startup support and SCHEV fund from the State of Virginia and DARPA MCMA (Materials with Controlled Microstructural Architecture, Program Manager J. Goldwasser) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors wish to acknowledge Y. Wang and M. Messner for useful input (LLNL-JRNL-677190). Large-area projection microstereolithography has been submitted and is pending a US patent.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA

    • Xiaoyu Zheng
    • , Huachen Cui
    •  & Da Chen
  2. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA

    • William Smith
    • , Julie Jackson
    • , Bryan Moran
    • , Jianchao Ye
    • , Nicholas Rodriguez
    • , Todd Weisgraber
    •  & Christopher M. Spadaccini
  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • Nicholas Fang

Authors

  1. Search for Xiaoyu Zheng in:

  2. Search for William Smith in:

  3. Search for Julie Jackson in:

  4. Search for Bryan Moran in:

  5. Search for Huachen Cui in:

  6. Search for Da Chen in:

  7. Search for Jianchao Ye in:

  8. Search for Nicholas Fang in:

  9. Search for Nicholas Rodriguez in:

  10. Search for Todd Weisgraber in:

  11. Search for Christopher M. Spadaccini in:

Contributions

X.Z. conceived and directed the research; X.Z. and W.S. designed structures; X.Z. designed the experiments. J.J., B.M., H.C. and X.Z. manufactured samples; W.S., H.C., D.C. and N.R. performed measurements; X.Z. and T.W. performed analytical and numerical analysis. J.Y. performed ex situ measurements on nickel–phosphorus; W.S., N.R., H.C. and X.Z. analysed data; X.Z. wrote the paper. X.Z. and C.M.S. supervised research. All authors contributed to interpreting the data, preparing and editing the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyu Zheng.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary information

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Movie 1

    Supplementary Movie 1

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Movie 2

    Supplementary Movie 2

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Movie 3

    Supplementary Movie 3

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Movie 4

    Supplementary Movie 4

  5. 5.

    Supplementary Movie 5

    Supplementary Movie 5

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4694

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.