Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Kinetics of the self-assembly of nanocrystal superlattices measured by real-time in situ X-ray scattering

Abstract

On solvent evaporation, non-interacting monodisperse colloidal particles self-assemble into a close-packed superlattice. Although the initial and final states can be readily characterized, little is known about the dynamic transformation from colloid to superlattice. Here, by using in situ grazing-incidence X-ray scattering, we tracked the self-assembly of lead sulfide nanocrystals in real time. Following the first appearance of an ordered arrangement, the superlattice underwent uniaxial contraction and collective rotation as it approached its final body-centred cubic structure. The nanocrystals became crystallographically aligned early in the overall self-assembly process, showing that nanocrystal ordering occurs on a faster timescale than superlattice densification. Our findings demonstrate that synchrotron X-ray scattering is a viable method for studying self-assembly in its native environment, with ample time resolution to extract kinetic rates and observe intermediate configurations. The method could be used for real-time direction of self-assembly processes and to better understand the forces governing self-organization of soft materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Characterization of nanocrystals.
Figure 2: X-ray scattering from the colloidal form (initial state) and the self-assembled superlattice (final state).
Figure 3: Time-resolved X-ray scattering reveals the transition from a disordered colloid to a highly ordered superlattice.
Figure 4: Kinetics of structural rearrangement during self-assembly.
Figure 5: Overall depiction of nanocrystal self-assembly highlighting the transition from fcc to bcc superlattice states.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams, R. C. & Smith, K. M. Crystallizable insect virus. Nature 179, 119–120 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones, J. B., Segnit, E. R. & Sanders, J. V. Structure of opal. Nature 204, 990–991 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alivisatos, A. P. Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science 271, 933–937 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kovalenko, M. V. et al. Prospects of nanoscience with nanocrystals. ACS Nano 9, 1012–1057 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Murray, C. B., Kagan, C. R. & Bawendi, M. G. Self-organization of CdSe nanocrystallites into three-dimensional quantum dot superlattices. Science 270, 1335–1338 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shevchenko, E. V., Talapin, D. V., Kotov, N. A., O’Brien, S. & Murray, C. B. Structural diversity in binary nanoparticle superlattices. Nature 439, 55–59 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, D. K., Goodfellow, B., Smilgies, D.-M. & Korgel, B. A. Self-assembled simple hexagonal AB2 binary nanocrystal superlattices: SEM, GISAXS, and defects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 3281–3290 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bodnarchuk, M. I., Kovalenko, M. V., Heiss, W. & Talapin, D. V. Energetic and entropic contributions to self-assembly of binary nanocrystal superlattices: temperature as the structure-directing factor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 11967–11977 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Korgel, B. A. & Fitzmaurice, D. Small-angle X-ray-scattering study of silver-nanocrystal disorder-order phase transitions. Phys. Rev. B 59, 14191–14201 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson, R. D. et al. Spontaneous superlattice formation in nanorods through partial cation exchange. Science 317, 355–358 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dong, A., Chen, J., Vora, P. M., Kikkawa, J. M. & Murray, C. B. Binary nanocrystal superlattice membranes self-assembled at the liquid-air interface. Nature 466, 474–477 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Talapin, D. V., Lee, J.-S., Kovalenko, M. V. & Shevchenko, E. V. Prospects of colloidal nanocrystals for electronic and optoelectronic applications. Chem. Rev. 110, 389–458 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanrath, T. Colloidal nanocrystal quantum dot assemblies as artificial solids. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 30, 030802 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park, J. et al. Direct observation of nanoparticle superlattice formation by using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. ACS Nano 6, 2078–2085 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Quan, Z. et al. Tilted face-centered-cubic supercrystals of PbS nanocubes. Nano Lett. 12, 4409–4413 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Quan, Z. et al. Solvent-mediated self-assembly of nanocube superlattices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 1352–1359 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu, F., Yager, K. G., Zhang, Y., Xin, H. & Gang, O. Superlattices assembled through shape-induced directional binding. Nature Commun. 6, 6912 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ip, A. H. et al. Hybrid passivated colloidal quantum dot solids. Nature Nanotech. 7, 577–582 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chuang, C. M., Brown, P. R., Bulović, V. & Bawendi, M. G. Improved performance and stability in quantum dot solar cells through band alignment engineering. Nature Mater. 13, 796–801 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, L. et al. Bright infrared quantum-dot light-emitting diodes through inter-dot spacing control. Nature Nanotech. 7, 369–373 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Supran, G. J. et al. High-performance shortwave-infrared light-emitting devices using core-shell (PbS-CdS) colloidal quantum dots. Adv. Mater. 27, 1437–1442 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weidman, M. C., Beck, M. E., Hoffman, R. S., Prins, F. & Tisdale, W. A. Monodisperse, air-stable PbS nanocrystals via precursor stoichiometry control. ACS Nano 8, 6363–6371 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi, H., Ko, J.-H., Kim, Y.-H. & Jeong, S. Steric-hindrance-driven shape transition in PbS quantum dots: understanding size-dependent stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 5278–5281 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Choi, J. J. et al. Controlling nanocrystal superlattice symmetry and shape-anisotropic interactions through variable ligand surface coverage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 3131–3138 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zherebetskyy, D. et al. Hydroxylation of the surface of PbS nanocrystals passivated with oleic acid. Science 344, 1380–1384 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weidman, M. C., Yager, K. G. & Tisdale, W. A. Interparticle spacing and structural ordering in superlattice PbS nanocrystal solids undergoing ligand exchange. Chem. Mater. 27, 474–482 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bian, K. et al. Shape-anisotropy driven symmetry transformations in nanocrystal superlattice polymorphs. ACS Nano 5, 2815–2823 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodfellow, B. W., Yu, Y., Bosoy, C. A., Smilgies, D.-M. & Korgel, B. A. The role of ligand packing frustration in body-centered cubic (bcc) superlattices of colloidal nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2406–2412 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bain, E. C. The nature of martensite. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Eng. 70, 25–46 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Crossland, E. J. W. et al. A bicontinuous double gyroid hybrid solar cell. Nano Lett. 9, 2807–2812 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaushik, A. P. & Clancy, P. Explicit all-atom modeling of realistically sized ligand-capped nanocrystals. J. Chem. Phys. 136, 114702 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaushik, A. P. & Clancy, P. Solvent-driven symmetry of self-assembled nanocrystal superlattices—a computational study. J. Comput. Chem. 34, 523–532 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gast, A. P. & Russel, W. B. Simple ordering in complex fluids. Phys. Today 51, 24–30 (December, 1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Smilgies, D.-M. & Blasini, D. R. Indexation scheme for oriented molecular thin films studied with grazing-incidence reciprocal-space mapping. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 716–718 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Busch, P., Rauscher, M., Smilgies, D.-M., Posselt, D. & Papadakis, C. M. Grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering from thin polymer films with lamellar structures - the scattering cross section in the distorted-wave Born approximation. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39, 433–442 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Li for assistance with the experimental set-up and measurements. This work was supported as part of the Center for Excitonics, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under award DE-SC0001088 (MIT). This work is based on research conducted at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS), which is supported by the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences under NSF award DMR-1332208. This work made use of the MRSEC Shared Experimental Facilities at MIT, supported by the National Science Foundation under award number DMR-08-19762. M.C.W. was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under grant number 1122374.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.C.W. and W.A.T. conceived and designed the project. D.-M.S. conceived and designed the in situ X-ray scattering system. M.C.W. synthesized materials and performed all experiments. M.C.W. and D.-M.S. indexed and analysed the X-ray scattering patterns. All authors discussed the results and interpretation. M.C.W. wrote the manuscript with contributions from the other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William A. Tisdale.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 3049 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 1 (MOV 4325 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

Supplementary Movie 2 (MOV 4106 kb)

Supplementary Movie 3

Supplementary Movie 3 (MOV 4652 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weidman, M., Smilgies, DM. & Tisdale, W. Kinetics of the self-assembly of nanocrystal superlattices measured by real-time in situ X-ray scattering. Nature Mater 15, 775–781 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4600

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4600

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing