Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Realistic molecular model of kerogen’s nanostructure

Nature Materials volume 15, pages 576–582 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Despite kerogen’s importance as the organic backbone for hydrocarbon production from source rocks such as gas shale, the interplay between kerogen’s chemistry, morphology and mechanics remains unexplored. As the environmental impact of shale gas rises, identifying functional relations between its geochemical, transport, elastic and fracture properties from realistic molecular models of kerogens becomes all the more important. Here, by using a hybrid experimental–simulation method, we propose a panel of realistic molecular models of mature and immature kerogens that provide a detailed picture of kerogen’s nanostructure without considering the presence of clays and other minerals in shales. We probe the models’ strengths and limitations, and show that they predict essential features amenable to experimental validation, including pore distribution, vibrational density of states and stiffness. We also show that kerogen’s maturation, which manifests itself as an increase in the sp2/sp3 hybridization ratio, entails a crossover from plastic-to-brittle rupture mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Kerogen in organic-rich shale formations.
Figure 2: Reconstruction of molecular models of kerogens.
Figure 3: Experimental validation of the molecular models.
Figure 4: Elastic properties of molecular models of kerogen.
Figure 5: Fracture testing of the four kerogens with ρ = 1.2 g cm−3.

References

  1. Kerr, R. A. Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene. Science 328, 1624–1626 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cueto-Felgueroso, L. & Juanes, R. Forecasting long-term gas production from shale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 19660–19661 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Osborn, S. G., Vengosh, A., Warner, N. R. & Jackson, R. B. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 8172–8176 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Howarth, R. W., Ingraffea, A. & Engelder, T. Natural gas: should fracking stop? Nature 477, 271–275 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vidic, R., Brantley, S., Vandenbossche, J., Yoxtheimer, D. & Abad, J. Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science 340, 1235009 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vandenbroucke, M. & Largeau, C. Kerogen origin, evolution and structure. Org. Geochem. 38, 719–833 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarkson, C. et al. Pore structure characterization of north American shale gas reservoirs using USANS/SANS, gas adsorption, and mercury intrusion. Fuel 103, 606–616 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mastalerz, M., He, L., Melnichenko, Y. B. & Rupp, J. A. Porosity of coal and shale: insights from gas adsorption and SANS/USANS techniques. Energy Fuels 26, 5109–5120 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas, J. J., Valenza, J. J., Craddock, P. R., Bake, K. D. & Pomerantz, A. E. The neutron scattering length density of kerogen and coal as determined by CH3OH/CD3OH exchange. Fuel 117, 801–808 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gu, X., Cole, D. R., Rother, G., Mildner, D. F. R. & Brantley, S. L. Pores in Marcellus shale: a neutron scattering and FIB-SEM study. Energy Fuels 29, 1295–1308 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Chen, S. & Li, W. Characteristics of nanoscale pore structure in northwestern Hunan shale gas reservoirs using field emission scanning electron microcopy, high-pressure mercury intrusion, and gas adsorption. Energy Fuels 28, 945–955 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Firouzi, M., Rupp, E. C., Liu, C. W. & Wilcox, J. Molecular simulation and experimental characterization of the nanoporous structures of coal and gas shale. Int. J. Coal Geol. 121, 123–128 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aguilera, R. et al. Flow units: from conventional to tight-gas to shale-gas to tight-oil to shale-oil reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 17, 190–208 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Falk, K., Coasne, B., Pellenq, R. J.-M., Ulm, F.-J. & Bocquet, L. Subcontinuum mass transport of condensed hydrocarbons in nanoporous media. Nature Commun. 6, 6949 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baihly, J. D. et al. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Behar, F. & Vandenbroucke, M. Chemical modelling of kerogens. Org. Geochem. 11, 15–24 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Siskin, M. et al. Composition, Geochemistry and Conversion of Oil Shales 143–158 (Springer, 1995).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Lille, Ű., Heinmaa, I. & Pehk, T. Molecular model of Estonian kukersite kerogen evaluated by 13C MAS NMR spectra. Fuel 82, 799–804 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kelemen, S. et al. Direct characterization of kerogen by X-ray and solid-state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance methods. Energy Fuels 21, 1548–1561 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Orendt, A. M. et al. Three-dimensional structure of the Siskin Green River oil shale kerogen model: a comparison between calculated and observed properties. Energy Fuels 27, 702–710 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Collell, J. et al. Molecular simulation of bulk organic matter in type II shales in the middle of the oil formation window. Energy Fuels 28, 7457–7466 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ungerer, P., Collell, J. & Yiannourakou, M. Molecular modelling of the volumetric and thermodynamic properties of kerogen: influence of organic type and maturity. Energy Fuels 29, 91–105 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yiannourakou, M. et al. Molecular simulation of adsorption in microporous materials. Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 68, 977–994 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mullins, O. C. et al. Advances in asphaltene science and the Yen–Mullins model. Energy Fuels 26, 3986–4003 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sedghi, M., Goual, L., Welch, W. & Kubelka, J. Effect of asphaltene structure on association and aggregation using molecular dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 5765–5776 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Okiongbo, K. S., Aplin, A. C. & Larter, S. R. Changes in type II kerogen density as a function of maturity: evidence from the Kimmeridge Clay Formation. Energy Fuels 19, 2495–2499 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tissot, B. & Welte, D. (eds) Petroleum Formation and Occurrence (Springer, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. van Krevelen, D. W. Coal: Typology, Chemistry, Physics, Constitution (Elsevier, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bousige, C., Boţan, A., Ulm, F.-J., Pellenq, R. J.-M. & Coasne, B. Optimized molecular reconstruction procedure combining hybrid reverse Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 142, 114112 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Firouzi, M., Alnoaimi, K., Kovscek, A. & Wilcox, J. Klinkenberg effect on predicting and measuring helium permeability in gas shales. Int. J. Coal Geol. 123, 62–68 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bažant, Z. P., Salviato, M., Chau, V. T., Viswanathan, H. & Zubelewicz, A. Why fracking works. J. Appl. Mech. 81, 101010 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Monteiro, P. J., Rycroft, C. H. & Barenblatt, G. I. A mathematical model of fluid and gas flow in nanoporous media. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20309–20313 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pomerantz, A. E. et al. Sulfur speciation in kerogen and bitumen from gas and oil shales. Org. Geochem. 68, 5–12 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Melezhik, V., Filippov, M. & Romashkin, A. A giant palaeoproterozoic deposit of shungite in NW Russia: genesis and practical applications. Ore Geol. Rev. 24, 135–154 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Melezhik, V. A. et al. Petroleum surface oil seeps from a palaeoproterozoic petrified giant oilfield. Terra Nova 21, 119–126 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kovalevski, V., Buseck, P. R. & Cowley, J. Comparison of carbon in shungite rocks to other natural carbons: an X-ray and TEM study. Carbon 39, 243–256 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Suleimenova, A. et al. Acid demineralization with critical point drying: a method for kerogen isolation that preserves microstructure. Fuel 135, 492–497 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Opletal, G. et al. Hybrid approach for generating realistic amorphous carbon structure using Metropolis and reverse Monte Carlo. Mol. Simul. 28, 927–938 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jain, S., Pellenq, R., Pikunic, J. & Gubbins, K. Molecular modeling of porous carbons using the hybrid reverse Monte Carlo method. Langmuir 22, 9942–9948 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ni, B., Lee, K.-H. & Sinnott, S. B. A reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential for hydrocarbon-oxygen interactions. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 16, 7261–7275 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bellissent-Funel, M.-C. Status of experiments probing the dynamics of water in confinement. Eur. Phys. J. E 12, 83–92 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Tomeczek, J. & Palugniok, H. Specific heat capacity and enthalpy of coal pyrolysis at elevated temperatures. Fuel 75, 1089–1093 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Savest, N. & Oja, V. Heat capacity of kukersite oil shale: literature overview. Oil Shale 30, 184–192 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bhattacharya, S. & Gubbins, K. E. Fast method for computing pore size distributions of model materials. Langmuir 22, 7726–7731 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rexer, T. F., Benham, M. J., Aplin, A. C. & Thomas, K. M. Methane adsorption on shale under simulated geological temperature and pressure conditions. Energy Fuels 27, 3099–3109 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Rexer, T. F. T., Mathia, E. J., Aplin, A. C. & Thomas, K. M. High-pressure methane adsorption and characterization of pores in Posidonia shales and isolated kerogens. Energy Fuels 28, 2886–2901 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen, C., Hu, D., Westacott, D. & Loveless, D. Nanometer-scale characterization of microscopic pores in shale kerogen by image analysis and pore-scale modeling. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 4066–4075 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Guo, X., Li, Y., Liu, R. & Wang, Q. Characteristics and controlling factors of micropore structures of the Longmaxi shale in the Jiaoshiba area, Sichuan Basin. Nat. Gas Ind. B 1, 165–171 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Klaver, J., Desbois, G., Littke, R. & Urai, J. L. BIB-SEM characterization of pore space morphology and distribution in postmature to overmature samples from the Haynesville and Bossier shales. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 59, 451–466 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Vandamme, M., Ulm, F.-J. & Fonollosa, P. Nanogranular packing of C–S–H at substochiometric conditions. Cement Concrete Res. 40, 14–26 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Mi, X. & Shi, Y. MRS Proceedings Vol. 1224, 1224-FF10-10 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  52. He, G., Eckert, J., Löser, W. & Schultz, L. Novel Ti-base nanostructure–dendrite composite with enhanced plasticity. Nature Mater. 2, 33–37 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Seewald, J. S. Organic–inorganic interactions in petroleum-producing sedimentary basins. Nature 426, 327–333 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Neuefeind, J., Feygenson, M., Carruth, J., Hoffmann, R. & Chipley, K. K. The nanoscale ordered MAterials diffractometer NOMAD at the Spallation Neutron Source SNS. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 287, 68–75 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. NIST, Neutron scattering lengths and cross sections; http://www.ncnr.nist.gov/resources/n-lengths.

  56. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comp. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Sun, H. Compass: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 7338–7364 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Materials Studio Modelling Environment Version 6.1 (Accelrys, 2013).

  59. Hinsen, K., Pellegrini, E., Stachura, S. & Kneller, G. R. nMoldyn 3: using task farming for a parallel spectroscopy-oriented analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comp. Chem. 33, 2043–2048 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the X-Shale project enabled through MIT’s Energy Initiative, with sponsorship provided by Shell and Schlumberger. Additional support was provided by the ICoME2 Labex (ANR-11-LABX-0053) and the A ∗ MIDEX projects (ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02) co-funded by the French programme ‘Investissements d’Avenir’ managed by ANR, the French National Research Agency. The authors thank M. Hubler (MIT) and J. Gelb (Carl Zeiss X-ray Microscopy) for providing the X-Ray Microscopy image of raw shale, and A. Saul, J. M. Leyssale, H. Van Damme and A. Archereau for fruitful discussions. The neutron scattering experiments were carried out at the Spallation Neutron Source, which is sponsored by the Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US Department of Energy, under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    Colin Bousige, Franz-Josef Ulm, Roland J.-M. Pellenq & Benoit Coasne

  2. 〈MSE〉2, UMI 3466 CNRS-MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    Colin Bousige, Roland J.-M. Pellenq & Benoit Coasne

  3. Institut de Science des Matériaux de Mulhouse (IS2M), UMR 7360 CNRS - UHA, 15 rue Jean Starcky, BP 2488, 68057 Mulhouse cedex, France

    Camélia Matei Ghimbeu & Cathie Vix-Guterl

  4. Schlumberger-Doll Research, 1 Hampshire Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    Andrew E. Pomerantz & Assiya Suleimenova

  5. European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, BP-220, F-38043, Grenoble Cedex 9, France

    Gavin Vaughan & Gaston Garbarino

  6. Chemical and Engineering Materials Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA

    Mikhail Feygenson

  7. Instrument and Source Division (NScD), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA

    Christoph Wildgruber

  8. CINaM, CNRS/Aix Marseille Université, Campus de Luminy, 13288 Marseille cedex 09, France

    Roland J.-M. Pellenq

Authors
  1. Colin Bousige
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Camélia Matei Ghimbeu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cathie Vix-Guterl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrew E. Pomerantz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Assiya Suleimenova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gavin Vaughan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gaston Garbarino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mikhail Feygenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Christoph Wildgruber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Franz-Josef Ulm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Roland J.-M. Pellenq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Benoit Coasne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.B., B.C., R.J.-M.P. and F.-J.U. designed the work. C.B. performed the simulations and data treatment. A.S. and A.E.P. performed the acid demineralization with critical point drying. A.S., A.E.P., C.M.G. and C.V.-G. measured the nitrogen and CO2 adsorption isotherms. C.B. and B.C. performed the scattering measurements with G.V., G.G., M.F. and C.W. as instrument scientists. C.B., B.C., R.J.-M.P. and F.-J.U. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoit Coasne.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 4494 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bousige, C., Ghimbeu, C., Vix-Guterl, C. et al. Realistic molecular model of kerogen’s nanostructure. Nature Mater 15, 576–582 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4541

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4541

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing