Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Programming curvature using origami tessellations

Abstract

Origami describes rules for creating folded structures from patterns on a flat sheet, but does not prescribe how patterns can be designed to fit target shapes. Here, starting from the simplest periodic origami pattern that yields one-degree-of-freedom collapsible structures—we show that scale-independent elementary geometric constructions and constrained optimization algorithms can be used to determine spatially modulated patterns that yield approximations to given surfaces of constant or varying curvature. Paper models confirm the feasibility of our calculations. We also assess the difficulty of realizing these geometric structures by quantifying the energetic barrier that separates the metastable flat and folded states. Moreover, we characterize the trade-off between the accuracy to which the pattern conforms to the target surface, and the effort associated with creating finer folds. Our approach enables the tailoring of origami patterns to drape complex surfaces independent of absolute scale, as well as the quantification of the energetic and material cost of doing so.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Geometry of generalized Miura-ori.
Figure 2: Optimal calculated origami tessellations and their physical paper analogues.
Figure 3: Foldability.
Figure 4: Accuracy–effort trade-off in origami tessellations.

References

  1. Demaine, E. & O’Rourke, J. Geometric Folding Algorithms: Linkages, Origami, Polyhedra (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lang, R. Origami Design Secrets 2nd edn (CRC Press, 2011).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Miura, K. Method of Packaging and Deployment of Large Membranes in Space Report No. 618 (Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kobayashi, H., Kresling, B. & Vincent, J. The geometry of unfolding tree leaves. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 147–154 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahadevan, L. & Rica, S. Self-organized origami. Science 307, 1740 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shyer, A. et al. Villification: how the gut gets its villi. Science 342, 212–218 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowden, N., Brittain, S., Evans, A. G., Hutchinson, J. & Whitesides, G. Spontaneous formation of ordered structures in thin films of metals supported on an elastomeric polymer. Nature 393, 146–149 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rizzieri, R., Mahadevan, L., Vaziri, A. & Donald, A. Superficial wrinkles in stretched, drying gelatin films. Langmuir 22, 3622–3626 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Audoly, B. & Boudaoud, A. Buckling of a stiff film bound to a compliant substrate – Part III: Herringbone solutions at large buckling parameter. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 56, 2444–2458 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei, Z. Y., Guo, Z. V., Dudte, L., Liang, H. Y. & Mahadevan, L. Geometric mechanics of periodic pleated origami. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 215501 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schenk, M. & Guest, S. D. Geometry of Miura-folded metamaterials. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3276–3281 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Silverberg, J. L. et al. Using origami design principles to fold reprogrammable mechanical metamaterials. Science 345, 647–650 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Silverberg, J. L. et al. Origami structures with a critical transition to bistability arising from hidden degrees of freedom. Nature Mater. 14, 389–393 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Waitukaitis, S., Menaut, R., Chen, B. & van Hecke, M. Origami multistability: from single vertices to metasheets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 055503 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tachi, T. Hangai prize papers for 2009: generalization of rigid-foldable quadrilateral-mesh origami. J. IASS 50, 173–179 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gattas, M. & You, Z. Miura-based rigid origami: parametrizations of curved-crease geometries. J. Mech. Des. 136, 121404 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tachi, T. Origamizing polyhedral surfaces. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics 16, 298–311 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tachi, T. Freeform origami tessellations by generalizing Resch’s patterns. J. Mech. Des. 135, 111006 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou, X., Wang, H. & You, Z. Design of three-dimensional origami structures based on vertex approach. Proc. R. Soc. A 471, 2184–2195 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Castle, T. et al. Making the cut: lattice kirigami rules. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 245502 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sussman, D. et al. Algorithmic lattice kirigami: a route to pluripotent materials. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7449–7453 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Blees, M. K. et al. Graphene kirigami. Nature 524, 204–207 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bern, M. W. & Hayes, B. The complexity of flat origami. Proc. 7th Annu (ACM-SIAM) Symp. Discrete Algorithms 175–183 (1996).

  24. Kawasaki, T. Proc. 1st Int. Meeting Origami Sci. Technol. (ed. Huzita, H.) 229–237 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, Y., Peng, R. & You, Z. Origami of thick panels. Science 349, 396–400 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Harvard Microrobotics Lab for help with laser cutting; J. Weaver and O. Ahanotu for help with measuring the stress-strain behaviour of origami hypars; and the Harvard MRSEC DMR 14-20570, NSF/JSPS EAPSI 2014 (L.H.D.), NSF DMS-1304211 (E.V.), Japan Science and Technology Agency Presto (T.T.) and the MacArthur Foundation (L.M.) for partial financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.H.D., E.V. and L.M. conceived and designed the research, with later contributions from T.T.; L.H.D. conducted the simulations and built the models; L.H.D., E.V. and L.M. analysed the results and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Mahadevan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

L.H.D., E.V. and L.M. are co-inventors of the surface-fitting algorithm and design method, patent-pending.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 8125 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

Supplementary Movie 1 (MOV 3764 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

Supplementary Movie 2 (MOV 4138 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dudte, L., Vouga, E., Tachi, T. et al. Programming curvature using origami tessellations. Nature Mater 15, 583–588 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4540

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4540

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing