Letter | Published:

Tough bonding of hydrogels to diverse non-porous surfaces

Nature Materials volume 15, pages 190196 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

In many animals, the bonding of tendon and cartilage to bone is extremely tough (for example, interfacial toughness 800 J m−2; refs 1,2), yet such tough interfaces have not been achieved between synthetic hydrogels and non-porous surfaces of engineered solids3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Here, we report a strategy to design tough transparent and conductive bonding of synthetic hydrogels containing 90% water to non-porous surfaces of diverse solids, including glass, silicon, ceramics, titanium and aluminium. The design strategy is to anchor the long-chain polymer networks of tough hydrogels covalently to non-porous solid surfaces, which can be achieved by the silanation of such surfaces. Compared with physical interactions, the chemical anchorage results in a higher intrinsic work of adhesion and in significant energy dissipation of bulk hydrogel during detachment, which lead to interfacial toughness values over 1,000 J m−2. We also demonstrate applications of robust hydrogel–solid hybrids, including hydrogel superglues, mechanically protective hydrogel coatings, hydrogel joints for robotic structures and robust hydrogel–metal conductors.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , & Effect of pore size on the peel strength of attachment of fibrous tissue to porous-surfaced implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 16, 571–584 (1982).

  2. 2.

    et al. Structural characterization and reliable biomechanical assessment of integrative cartilage repair. J. Biomech. 38, 1846–1854 (2005).

  3. 3.

    , , & Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Adv. Mater. 15, 1155–1158 (2003).

  4. 4.

    et al. High-water-content mouldable hydrogels by mixing clay and a dendritic molecular binder. Nature 463, 339–343 (2010).

  5. 5.

    , , & Ionically cross-linked triblock copolymer hydrogels with high strength. Macromolecules 43, 6193–6201 (2010).

  6. 6.

    et al. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489, 133–136 (2012).

  7. 7.

    et al. Physical hydrogels composed of polyampholytes demonstrate high toughness and viscoelasticity. Nature Mater. 12, 932–937 (2013).

  8. 8.

    , , , & “Nonswellable” hydrogel without mechanical hysteresis. Science 343, 873–875 (2014).

  9. 9.

    et al. An anisotropic hydrogel with electrostatic repulsion between cofacially aligned nanosheets. Nature 517, 68–72 (2015).

  10. 10.

    , , & Hydrogels in biology and medicine: From molecular principles to bionanotechnology. Adv. Mater. 18, 1345–1360 (2006).

  11. 11.

    & Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem. Rev. 101, 1869–1880 (2001).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Reversible switching of hydrogel-actuated nanostructures into complex micropatterns. Science 315, 487–490 (2007).

  13. 13.

    , & Antifouling coatings: Recent developments in the design of surfaces that prevent fouling by proteins, bacteria, and marine organisms. Adv. Mater. 23, 690–718 (2011).

  14. 14.

    , , & Adaptive liquid microlenses activated by stimuli-responsive hydrogels. Nature 442, 551–554 (2006).

  15. 15.

    et al. Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels. Nature 404, 588–590 (2000).

  16. 16.

    et al. Stretchable, transparent, ionic conductors. Science 341, 984–987 (2013).

  17. 17.

    et al. Electronically programmable, reversible shape change in two-and three-dimensional hydrogel structures. Adv. Mater. 25, 1541–1546 (2013).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Formation of a strong hydrogel–porous solid interface via the double-network principle. Acta Biomater. 6, 1353–1359 (2010).

  19. 19.

    & Effect of interfacial bonding on the strength of adhesion. J. Polym. Sci. 13, 1285–1300 (1975).

  20. 20.

    Adhesion and strength of viscoelastic solids. Is there a relationship between adhesion and bulk properties? Langmuir 12, 4492–4496 (1996).

  21. 21.

    Peel adhesion: Influence of surface energies and adhesive rheology. J. Adhes. 1, 102–123 (1969).

  22. 22.

    , , & Relationship between viscoelastic and peeling properties of model adhesives. Part 1. Cohesive fracture. J. Adhes. 61, 123–157 (1997).

  23. 23.

    , , , & Reversible adhesion between a hydrogel and a polymer brush. Soft Matter 8, 8184–8193 (2012).

  24. 24.

    , , & Thermally switchable periodicities and diffraction from mesoscopically ordered materials. Science 274, 959–963 (1996).

  25. 25.

    Why are double network hydrogels so tough? Soft Matter 6, 2583–2590 (2010).

  26. 26.

    Multi-scale multi-mechanism design of tough hydrogels: Building dissipation into stretchy networks. Soft Matter 10, 672–687 (2014).

  27. 27.

    & Strength of highly elastic materials. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 300, 108–119 (1967).

  28. 28.

    , , & Large strain hysteresis and Mullins effect of tough double-network hydrogels. Macromolecules 40, 2919–2927 (2007).

  29. 29.

    & Silanization of supporting glass plates avoiding fixation of polyacrylamide gels to glass cover plates. Electrophoresis 7, 99 (1986).

  30. 30.

    Thin-film peeling-the elastic term. J. Phys. D 8, 1449–1452 (1975).

  31. 31.

    , , & Meniscus instability in a thin elastic film. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4329–4332 (2000).

  32. 32.

    , , , & Digital instability of a confined elastic meniscus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12545–12548 (2013).

  33. 33.

    & A pseudo–elastic model for the Mullins effect in filled rubber. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 455, 2861–2877 (1999).

  34. 34.

    , & Designing extremely resilient and tough hydrogels via delayed dissipation. Extreme Mech. Lett. 1, 70–75 (2014).

  35. 35.

    et al. 3D printing of highly stretchable and tough hydrogels into complex, cellularized structures. Adv. Mater. 27, 4035–4040 (2015).

  36. 36.

    et al. Performance and biocompatibility of extremely tough alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogels. Biomaterials 34, 8042–8048 (2013).

  37. 37.

    , & PEGDA hydrogels with patterned elasticity: Novel tools for the study of cell response to substrate rigidity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 105, 636–644 (2010).

  38. 38.

    & Surface hydroxylation and silane grafting on fumed and thermal silica. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 264, 354–361 (2003).

  39. 39.

    , , & Multilayer alkoxysilane silylation of oxide surfaces. Langmuir 17, 5882–5888 (2001).

  40. 40.

    , , & Grafting of cross-linked hydrogel networks to titanium surfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 958–966 (2014).

  41. 41.

    et al. Tailoring hydrogel adhesion to polydimethylsiloxane substrates using polysaccharide glue. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 6949–6952 (2013).

  42. 42.

    , , & Sequential robust design methodology and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to analyze the grafting of hyaluronic acid to glass substrates. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 61, 391–398 (2002).

  43. 43.

    et al. Transparent hydrogel with enhanced water retention capacity by introducing highly hydratable salt. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 151903 (2014).

  44. 44.

    et al. Ionic cable. Extreme Mech. Lett. 3, 59–65 (2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank A. Wang and L. Griffith for their help on the cell viability test. This work is supported by ONR (No. N00014-14-1-0528), MIT Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies and NSF (No. CMMI-1253495). H.Y. acknowledges the financial support from Samsung Scholarship. X.Z. acknowledges the supports from NIH (No. UH3TR000505) and MIT Materials Research Science and Engineering Center.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Soft Active Materials Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • Hyunwoo Yuk
    • , Teng Zhang
    • , Shaoting Lin
    • , German Alberto Parada
    •  & Xuanhe Zhao
  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • German Alberto Parada
  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • Xuanhe Zhao

Authors

  1. Search for Hyunwoo Yuk in:

  2. Search for Teng Zhang in:

  3. Search for Shaoting Lin in:

  4. Search for German Alberto Parada in:

  5. Search for Xuanhe Zhao in:

Contributions

X.Z. and H.Y. conceived the idea. H.Y., T.Z., S.L., G.A.P. and X.Z. designed the research. H.Y., S.L. and G.A.P. carried out the experiments and T.Z. performed the numerical simulation. H.Y., T.Z., S.L., G.A.P. and X.Z. analysed and interpreted the results. X.Z. drafted the manuscript and all authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuanhe Zhao.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Movie 1

    Supplementary Movie 1

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Movie 2

    Supplementary Movie 2

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Movie 3

    Supplementary Movie 3

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Movie 4

    Supplementary Movie 4

  5. 5.

    Supplementary Movie 5

    Supplementary Movie 5

  6. 6.

    Supplementary Movie 6

    Supplementary Movie 6

  7. 7.

    Supplementary Movie 7

    Supplementary Movie 7

  8. 8.

    Supplementary Movie 8

    Supplementary Movie 8

  9. 9.

    Supplementary Movie 9

    Supplementary Movie 9

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4463

Further reading