Abstract
Chemical warfare agents containing phosphonate ester bonds are among the most toxic chemicals known to mankind1. Recent global military events, such as the conflict and disarmament in Syria2, have brought into focus the need to find effective strategies for the rapid destruction of these banned chemicals. Solutions are needed for immediate personal protection (for example, the filtration and catalytic destruction of airborne versions of agents), bulk destruction of chemical weapon stockpiles, protection (via coating) of clothing, equipment and buildings, and containment of agent spills3. Solid heterogeneous materials such as modified activated carbon or metal oxides exhibit many desirable characteristics for the destruction of chemical warfare agents4,5,6. However, low sorptive capacities, low effective active site loadings, deactivation of the active site, slow degradation kinetics, and/or a lack of tailorability offer significant room for improvement in these materials. Here, we report a carefully chosen metal–organic framework (MOF) material featuring high porosity and exceptional chemical stability that is extraordinarily effective for the degradation of nerve agents and their simulants. Experimental and computational evidence points to Lewis-acidic ZrIV ions as the active sites and to their superb accessibility as a defining element of their efficacy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Raushel, F. M. Catalytic detoxification. Nature 469, 310–311 (2011).
Enserink, M. U. N. taps special labs to investigate Syrian attack. Science 341, 1050–1051 (2013).
Smith, B. M. Catalytic methods for the destruction of chemical warfare agents under ambient conditions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 470–478 (2008).
Peterson, G. W. & Rossin, J. A. Removal of chlorine gases from streams of air using reactive zirconium hydroxide based filtration media. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51, 2675–2681 (2012).
Wagner, G. W., Peterson, G. W. & Mahle, J. J. Effect of adsorbed water and surface hydroxyls on the hydrolysis of VX, GD, and HD on titania materials: The development of self-decontaminating paints. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51, 3598–3603 (2012).
Bandosz, T. J. et al. Reactions of VX, GD, and HD with Zr(OH)4: Near instantaneous decontamination of VX. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 11606–11614 (2012).
Furukawa, H., Cordova, K. E., O’Keeffe, M. & Yaghi, O. M. The chemistry and applications of metal–organic frameworks. Science 341, 1230444 (2013).
Lee, J. et al. Metal–organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1450–1459 (2009).
Decoste, J. B. & Peterson, G. W. Metal–organic frameworks for air purification of toxic chemicals. Chem. Rev. 114, 5695–5727 (2014).
Katz, M. J. et al. Simple and compelling biomimetic metal–organic framework catalyst for the degradation of nerve agent simulants. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 497–501 (2013).
Cavka, J. H. et al. A new zirconium inorganic building brick forming metal organic frameworks with exceptional stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13850–13851 (2008).
Wu, H., Yildirim, T. & Zhou, W. Exceptional mechanical stability of highly porous zirconium metal–organic framework UiO-66 and its important implications. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 925–930 (2013).
Mondloch, J. E. et al. Are Zr6-based MOFs water stable? Linker hydrolysis vs. capillary-force-driven channel collapse. Chem. Commun. 50, 8944–8946 (2014).
Mondloch, J. E. et al. Vapor-phase metalation by atomic layer deposition in a metal–organic framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 10294–10297 (2013).
Planas, N. et al. Defining the proton topology of the Zr6-based metal–organic framework NU-1000. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 3716–3723 (2014).
Kickelbick, G., Wiede, P. & Schubert, U. Variations in capping the Zr6O4(OH)4 cluster core. X-ray structure analyses of [Zr6(OH)4O4(OOC–CH = CH2)10]2(μ-OOC–CH = CH2)4 and Zr6(OH)4O4(OOCR)12(PrOH) (R = Ph, CMe = CH2). Inorg. Chim. Acta 284, 1–7 (1999).
Rai, N. & Siepmann, J. I. Transferable potentials for phase equilibria. 9. Explicit hydrogen description of benzene and five-membered and six-membered heterocyclic aromatic compounds. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 10790–10799 (2007).
Chen, S-L., Fang, W-H. & Himo, F. Theoretical study of the phosphotriesterase reaction mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 1253–1255 (2007).
Parkin, G. Synthetic analogues relevant to the structure and function of zinc enzymes. Chem. Rev. 104, 699–768 (2004).
Wang, S., Bromberg, L., Schreuder-Gibson, H. & Hatton, T. A. Organophophorous ester degradation by chromium(III) terephthalate metal–organic framework (MIL-101) chelated to N, N-dimethylaminopyridine and related aminopyridines. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 1269–1278 (2013).
Peterson, G. W. & Wagner, G. W. Detoxification of chemical warfare agents by CuBTC. J. Porous Mater. 21, 121–126 (2014).
Dang, D. et al. Structural and catalytic performance of a polyoxometalate-based metal–organic framework having a lanthanide nanocage as a secondary building block. Inorg. Chem. 49, 1280–1282 (2010).
Acknowledgements
O.K.F., R.Q.S. and J.T.H. gratefully acknowledge DTRA for financial support (grant HDTRA-1-10-0023). C.J.C. gratefully acknowledges funding from the US DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences (Award DE-FG02-12ER16362). R.Q.S. acknowledges the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) for computational resources. J.B.D. and G.W.P. gratefully acknowledge Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical Biological Defense (JSTO–CBD) for funding (Project Number BA13PHM210).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.E.M., M.J.K., J.T.H. and O.K.F. developed the concept. J.E.M., M.J.K. and W.B. carried out the materials synthesis, characterization, and catalysis with the simulant DMNP under the supervision of O.K.F. and J.T.H.; P.G. and P.L. carried out DFT simulations with DMNP under the supervision of R.Q.S.; W.C.I.III carried out DFT simulations with GD and VX under the supervision of C.J.C.; G.W.W. and M.G.H. carried out GD NMR degradation experiments under the guidance of J.B.D. and G.W.P.; J.E.M., M.J.K., J.T.H., and O.K.F. wrote the manuscript first draft and the rest of the authors contributed to the editing.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
R.Q.S., J.T.H. and O.K.F. have a financial interest in the start-up company NuMat Technologies, which is seeking to commercialize metal–organic frameworks.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 1406 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mondloch, J., Katz, M., Isley III, W. et al. Destruction of chemical warfare agents using metal–organic frameworks. Nature Mater 14, 512–516 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4238
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4238
This article is cited by
-
Biomimetic single Al-OH site with high acetylcholinesterase-like activity and self-defense ability for neuroprotection
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Design, synthesis and applications of functional zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks
Science China Chemistry (2023)
-
Strategies for enhanced bioavailability of oxime reactivators in the central nervous system
Archives of Toxicology (2023)
-
Single copper sites dispersed on metal-organic frameworks boost the degradation of nerve agent simulants
Science China Materials (2023)
-
Data-informed discovery of hydrolytic nanozymes
Nature Communications (2022)