Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Cell rheology

Mush rather than machine

Nature Materials volume 12, pages 184–185 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

The cytoplasm of living cells responds to deformation in much the same way as a water-filled sponge does. This behaviour, although intuitive, is connected to long-standing and unsolved fundamental questions in cell mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The cytoskeleton behaves as a poroelastic material.
Figure 2: The rheological properties of the cytoplasm of eukaryote cells compare to those of non-living soft matter.

References

  1. Bursac, P. et al. Nature Mater. 4, 557–571 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Einstein, A. Ann. Physik 19, 371–381 (1905).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stamenovic, D. Acta Biomaterialia 1, 255–262 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou, E. H. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10632–10637 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fabry, B. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 148102 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Trepat, X. et al. Nature 447, 592–595 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dahl, K. N., Engler, A. J., Pajerowski, J. D. & Discher, D. E. Biophys. J. 89, 2855–2864 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moeendarbary, E. et al. Nature Mater. 12, 253–261 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolff, L., Fernandez, P. & Kroy, K. PLoS ONE 7, e40063 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cavalier-Smith, T. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52, 297–354 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnan, R. et al. PLoS ONE 4, e5486 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Newman, S. A. Science 338, 217–219 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Steinberg, M. S. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17, 281–286 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Angelini, T. E. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4714–4719 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanchez, T., Chen, D. T., DeCamp, S. J., Heymann, M. & Dogic, Z. Nature 491, 431–434 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, 02115, Massachusetts, USA

    Enhua H. Zhou & Jeffrey J. Fredberg

  2. University of Arizona, Tucson, 85724, Arizona, USA

    Fernando D. Martinez

Authors
  1. Enhua H. Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fernando D. Martinez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeffrey J. Fredberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey J. Fredberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, E., Martinez, F. & Fredberg, J. Mush rather than machine. Nature Mater 12, 184–185 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3574

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3574

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research