Abstract
The high carrier mobility of graphene1,2,3,4 is key to its applications,and understanding the factors that limit mobility is essential for future devices. Yet, despite significant progress, mobilities in excess of the 2×105 cm2 V−1 s−1 demonstrated in free-standing graphene films5,6 have not been duplicated in conventional graphene devices fabricated on substrates. Understanding the origins of this degradation is perhaps the main challenge facing graphene device research. Experiments that probe carrier scattering in devices are often indirect7, relying on the predictions of a specific model for scattering, such as random charged impurities in the substrate8,9,10. Here, we describe model-independent, atomic-scale transport measurements that show that scattering at two key defects—surface steps and changes in layer thickness—seriously degrades transport in epitaxial graphene films on SiC. These measurements demonstrate the strong impact of atomic-scale substrate features on graphene performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Substrate induced nanoscale resistance variation in epitaxial graphene
Nature Communications Open Access 28 January 2020
-
Electronic transport in planar atomic-scale structures measured by two-probe scanning tunneling spectroscopy
Nature Communications Open Access 05 April 2019
-
Electrical resistance of individual defects at a topological insulator surface
Nature Communications Open Access 12 June 2017
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




References
Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197–200 (2005).
Zhang, Y. B., Tan, Y-W., Stormer, H. L. & Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature 438, 201–204 (2005).
Berger, C. et al. Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene. Science 312, 1191–1196 (2006).
Avouris, P. Graphene: Electronic and photonic properties and devices. Nano Lett. 10, 4285–4294 (2010).
Du, X., Skachko, I., Barker, A. & Andrei, E. Y. Approaching ballistic transport in suspended graphene. Nature Nanotech. 3, 491–495 (2008).
Bolotin, K. I., Sikes, K. J., Hone, J., Stormer, H. L. & Kim, P. Temperature-dependent transport in suspended graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 096802 (2008).
Chen, J-H. et al. Intrinsic and extrinsic performance limits of graphene devices on SiO2 . Nature Nanotech. 3, 206–209 (2008).
Ando, T. Screening effect and impurity scattering in monolayer graphene. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 75, 074716 (2006).
Hwang, E. H., Adam, S. & Das Sarma, S. Carrier transport in two-dimensional graphene layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 186806 (2007).
Cheianov, V. & Fal’ko, V. I. Friedel oscillations, impurity scattering, and temperature dependence of resistivity in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 226801 (2006).
Hibino, H. et al. Microscopic thickness determination of thin graphite films formed on SiC from quantized oscillation in reflectivity of low-energy electrons. Phys. Rev. B 77, 075413 (2008).
Mallet, P. et al. Electron states of mono- and bilayer graphene on SiC probed by scanning-tunnelling microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 76, 041403(R) (2007).
Rutter, G. M. et al. Scattering and interference in epitaxial graphene. Science 317, 219–222 (2007).
Lauffer, P. et al. Atomic and electronic structure of few-layer graphene on SiC(0001) studied with scanning tunnelling microscopy and spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 77, 155426 (2008).
Bannani, A., Bobisch, C. A. & Möller, R. Local potentiometry using a multiprobe scanning tunnelling microscope. Rev. Sci. Intrum. 79, 083704 (2008).
Homoth, J. et al. Electronic transport on the nanoscale: Ballistic transmission and Ohm’s law. Nano Lett. 9, 1588–1592 (2009).
Rutter, G. M. et al. Imaging the interface of epitaxial graphene with silicon carbide via scanning tunnelling microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 76, 235416 (2007).
Ohta, T. et al. Interlayer interaction and electronic screening in multilayer graphene investigated with angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 206802 (2007).
Zhou, S. Y. et al. Substrate-induced bandgap opening in epitaxial graphene. Nature Mater. 6, 770–775 (2007).
Nagase, M., Hibino, H., Kageshima, H. & Yamaguchi, H. Local conductance measurements of double-layer graphene on SiC substrate. Nanotechnology 20, 445704 (2009).
Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F., Peres, N. M. R., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109–162 (2009).
Nilsson, J., Castro Neto, A. H., Guinea, F. & Peres, N. M. R. Transmission through a biased graphene bilayer barrier. Phys. Rev. B 76, 165416 (2007).
Nakanishi, T., Koshino, M. & Ando, T. Transmission through a boundary between monolayer and bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 82, 125428 (2010).
González, J. W., Santos, H., Pacheco, M., Chico, L. & Brey, L. Electronic transport through bilayer graphene flakes. Phys. Rev. B 81, 195406 (2010).
Yakes, M. K. et al. Conductance anisotropy in epitaxial graphene sheets generated by substrate interactions. Nano Lett. 10, 1559–1562 (2010).
Nirmalraj, P. N. et al. Nanoscale mapping of electrical resistivity and connectivity in graphene strips and networks. Nano Lett. 11, 16–22 (2011).
Lui, C. H., Liu, L., Mak, K. F., Flynn, G. W. & Heinz, T. F. Ultraflat graphene. Nature 462, 339–341 (2009).
Dean, C. R. et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nature Nanotech. 5, 722–726 (2010).
Tromp, R. M. & Hannon, J. B. Thermodynamics and kinetics of graphene growth on SiC(0001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 106104 (2009).
Hannon, J. B. & Tromp, R. M. Pit formation during graphene synthesis on SiC(0001): In situ electron microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 77, 241404(R) (2008).
Acknowledgements
We thank A. Ellis and M. C. Reuter of IBM for their assistance with experimental aspects of this work, and R. Möller and X. Chen for discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S-H.J. carried out scanning tunnelling potentiometry experiments, J.B.H. and R.M.T. grew the graphene and carried out LEEM; J.T. and V.P. carried out the calculations; S-H.J., F.M.R., J.B.H. and R.M.T. collaborated on equipment and experimental design; all authors wrote the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 582 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ji, SH., Hannon, J., Tromp, R. et al. Atomic-scale transport in epitaxial graphene. Nature Mater 11, 114–119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3170
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3170
This article is cited by
-
Substrate induced nanoscale resistance variation in epitaxial graphene
Nature Communications (2020)
-
Electric-Carrying Nanofriction Properties of Atomic-Scale Steps on Graphene
Tribology Letters (2020)
-
Electronic transport in planar atomic-scale structures measured by two-probe scanning tunneling spectroscopy
Nature Communications (2019)
-
Thermal, electrical and characterization effects of graphene on the properties of low-density polyethylene composites
International Journal of Plastics Technology (2018)
-
Electrical resistance of individual defects at a topological insulator surface
Nature Communications (2017)