Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A genetic algorithm for predicting the structures of interfaces in multicomponent systems

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 March 2010

This article has been updated

Abstract

Recent years have seen great advances in our ability to predict crystal structures from first principles. However, previous algorithms have focused on the prediction of bulk crystal structures, where the global minimum is the target. Here, we present a general atomistic approach to simulate in multicomponent systems the structures and free energies of grain boundaries and heterophase interfaces with fixed stoichiometric and non-stoichiometric compositions. The approach combines a new genetic algorithm using empirical interatomic potentials to explore the configurational phase space of boundaries, and thereafter refining structures and free energies with first-principles electronic structure methods. We introduce a structural order parameter to bias the genetic algorithm search away from the global minimum (which would be bulk crystal), while not favouring any particular structure types, unless they lower the energy. We demonstrate the power and efficiency of the algorithm by considering non-stoichiometric grain boundaries in a ternary oxide, SrTiO3.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the genetic algorithm.
Figure 2: Grain-boundary energies as a function of μTiO2 for the interface.
Figure 3
Figure 4: The ΓTiO2 =2 grain boundary.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 04 March 2010

    In the version of this Article originally published, the words ‘an unusual’ in the abstract should have been ‘a new’. This has been corrected in all versions of this Article.

References

  1. Dillon, S. J., Tang, M., Carter, W. C. & Harmer, M. J. Complexion: A new concept for kinetic engineering in materials science. Acta Mater. 55, 6208–6218 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sun, E. Y. et al. Microstructural design of silicon nitride with improved fracture toughness: II, effects of yttria and alumina additives. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 2831–2840 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiang, Y.-M., Silverman, L. A., French, R. H. & Cannon, R. M. Thin glass film between ultrafine conductor particles in thick-film resistors. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77, 1143–1152 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Luo, J., Wang, H. F. & Chiang, Y.-M. Origin of solid-state activated sintering in Bi2O3-doped ZnO. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 916–920 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. von Alfthan, S., Haynes, P. D., Kaski, K. & Sutton, A. P. Are the structures of twist grain boundaries in silicon ordered at 0 K? Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 055505 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiang, H. J., Da Silva, J. L. F., Branz, H. M. & Su-Huai, W. Understanding the clean interface between covalent Si and ionic Al2O3 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 116101 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deaven, D. M. & Ho, K. M. Molecular geometry optimization with a genetic algorithm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 288–291 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Oganov, A. R. & Glass, C. W. Crystal structure prediction using ab initio evolutionary techniques: Principles and applications. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 244704 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang, J., Wang, C. Z. & Ho, K. M. Finding the low-energy structures of Si[001] symmetric tilted grain boundaries with a genetic algorithm. Phys. Rev. B 80, 174102 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morris, G. M. et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 19, 1639–1662 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Benedek, N. A., Chua, A.-L. S., Elsässer, C., Sutton, A. P. & Finnis, M. W. Interatomic potentials for strontium titanate: An assessment of their transferability and comparison with density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 78, 064110 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, S. B. & Northrup, J. E. Chemical-potential dependence of defect formation energies in GaAs—application to Ga self-diffusion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2339–2342 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Finnis, M. W., Lozovoi, A. Y. & Alavi, A. The oxidation of NiAl: What can we learn from ab initio calculations? Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 35, 167–207 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brindle, A. Genetic algorithms for function optimization. Tech. Report TR81-2, (Univ. Alberta, Department of Computer Science, 1981).

  15. Goldberg, D. E. & Deb, K. in Foundations of Genetic Algorithms I (ed. Rawlins, G. J. E.) (Morgan Kaufmann, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Z. L., Sigle, W., Phillipp, F. & Rühle, M. Direct atom-resolved imaging of oxides and their grain boundaries. Science 302, 846–849 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinhardt, P. J., Nelson, D. R. & Ronchetti, M. Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses. Phys. Rev. B 28, 784–805 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Batyrev, I. G., Alavi, A. & Finnis, M. W. Equilibrium and adhesion of Nb/sapphire: The effect of oxygen partial pressure. Phys. Rev. B 62, 4698–4706 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnston, K., Castell, M. R., Paxton, A. T. & Finnis, M. W. SrTiO3(2×1) reconstructions: First-principles calculations of surface energy and atomic structure compared with scanning tunnelling microscopy images. Phys. Rev. B 70, 085415 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clark, S. J. et al. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. Kristallogr. 220, 567–570 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Commission under contract No. NMP3-CT-2005-013862 (INCEMS). The calculations were carried out using the facilities of the High Performance Computing Service at Imperial College London.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.L.-S.C. designed the genetic algorithm (with contributions from all authors), implemented it and carried out the genetic-algorithm simulations. N.A.B. carried out the ab initio thermodynamics calculations and some of the genetic-algorithm simulations. L.C. tested an early version of the genetic algorithm. A.L.-S.C., N.A.B., M.W.F. and A.P.S. wrote and edited the manuscript. A.P.S. conceived the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian P. Sutton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 188 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chua, AS., Benedek, N., Chen, L. et al. A genetic algorithm for predicting the structures of interfaces in multicomponent systems. Nature Mater 9, 418–422 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2712

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2712

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing