Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Material witness

Why is boron so hard?

Everyone knows about the disputed discovery of oxygen, but it's less widely known that boron is dogged by the same controversy, and with a similar Anglo–Gallic flavour. In this case the rivals were Louis Joseph Gay-Lussac and Louis Jacques Thenard in France and Humphry Davy in England, both of whom announced the discovery in June 1808. Gay-Lussac and Thenard used chemistry (reducing boric acid with potassium, which Davy had reported the previous year), whereas Davy used his trademark method of electrolysis.

However, neither technique produced pure boron. It wasn't until 1895 that Henri Moissan came close to doing that by the reduction of borax with magnesium; but most accounts credit the American chemist E. Weintraub with having made the first 'pure' samples in 1909–1911. Even that is not fully clear, because the first pure boron phase, β-B106, was not reported until 1957 (ref. 1).

Much of this confusion arises because boron's chemistry and phase behaviour are extremely complicated — as Artem Oganov and Vladimir Solozhenko argue in a recent paper that revisits this history2, it is “arguably the most complex element in the periodic table”. Boron forms boron-rich yet stoichiometric compounds with many elements, such as YB66, NaB15 and B50N2, all with complex crystal structures different from those of the pure phases. This has led many scientists astray, beginning with the mistaken assignation by Friedrich Wöhler and Henri Sainte-Claire Deville of diamond-like, graphite-like and amorphous polymorphs analogous to those of carbon3.

None of the early boron polymorphs were pure phases. The so-called I-tetragonal phase, recorded in 1943, was considered sufficiently secure to feature4 in Linus Pauling's The Nature of the Chemical Bond, but is now considered to be a boron-rich carbide or nitride. And of the 16 polymorphs described so far, most are likely to be boron-rich compounds. Only for four of these putative phases are crystal structures known, most of them composed of interlinked B12 icosahedra.

This confusion and uncertainty is all the more surprising as boron is such a potentially useful material. Even in the mid-nineteenth century it was known to be very hard, and the synthesis of cubic boron nitride by researchers at General Electric in the 1950s supplied the main industrial alternative to diamond for cutting tools and abrasion. Robert Wentorf, one of the key players in that work, reported a very hard form of pure boron in 1965 made at high temperature and pressure5; but this was neglected until high-pressure phases of boron became fashionable because of their possible superconductivity6. And astonishingly, it wasn't until 2007 that the most stable phase of boron under ambient conditions was finally identified7,8,9.

The controversies are by no means over, for the priority for discovery of a new superhard phase of boron, γ-B28, remains disputed10,11,12. (It seems possible that Wentorf's hard material was an impure form of this one.) The uniqueness of its crystal structure10 (no B12 icosahedra) suggests that we may still be only scratching the surface of boron.


  1. 1

    Sands, D. E. & Hoard, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 79, 5582–5583 (1957).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Oganov, A. R. & Solozhenko, V. L. J. Superhard Mater. 31, 285–291 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Sainte-Claire Deville, H. & Wöhler, F. Ann. Physik 176, 635–646 (1857).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Pauling, L. The Nature of the Chemical Bond 3rd edn (Cornell Univ. Press, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Wentorf, R. H. Science 147, 49–50 (1965).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Eremets, M. I., Struzhkin, V. W., Mao, H. K. & Hemley, R. J. Science 293, 272–274 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Van Setten, M. J., Uijttewaal, M. A., de Wijs, G. A. & de Groot, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 2458–2465 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Widom, M. & Mihalkovic, M. Phys. Rev. B 77, 064113 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Ogitsu, T. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 1903–1909 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Oganov, A. R. et al. Nature 457, 863–867 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Solozhenko, V. L., Kurakevych, O. O. & Oganov, A. R. J. Superhard Mater. 30, 428–429 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Zarechnaya, E. Y. et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 185501 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Why is boron so hard?. Nature Mater 9, 6 (2010).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing