Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Cell-wall recovery after irreversible deformation of wood

Abstract

The remarkable mechanical properties of biological materials reside in their complex hierarchical architecture and in specific molecular mechanistic phenomena1,2,3. The fundamental importance of molecular interactions and bond recovery has been suggested by studies on deformation and fracture of bone and nacre4,5,6. Like these mineral-based materials, wood also represents a complex nanocomposite with excellent mechanical performance, despite the fact that it is mainly based on polymers. In wood, however, the mechanistic contribution of processes in the cell wall is not fully understood7,8,9. Here we have combined tensile tests on individual wood cells and on wood foils with simultaneous synchrotron X-ray diffraction analysis in order to separate deformation mechanisms inside the cell wall from those mediated by cell–cell interactions. We show that tensile deformation beyond the yield point does not deteriorate the stiffness of either individual cells or foils. This indicates that there is a dominant recovery mechanism that re-forms the amorphous matrix between the cellulose microfibrils within the cell wall, maintaining its mechanical properties. This stick–slip mechanism, rather like Velcro operating at the nanometre level, provides a 'plastic response' similar to that effected by moving dislocations in metals. We suggest that the molecular recovery mechanism in the cell matrix is a universal phenomenon dominating the tensile deformation of different wood tissue types.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: In situ synchrotron experiment on a wet wood foil.
Figure 2: Tensile experiment on individual wood cell.
Figure 3: Schematic relation between shear stress and strain in the matrix between cellulose fibrils in cell wall.
Figure 4: Mechanical behaviour of wood foils according to Equation 1.
Figure 5: Ratios of elastic moduli to wood density ρ plotted against microfibril angle for various wood tissue types tested in wet conditions.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weiner, S. & Wagner, H.D. The material bone: structure-mechanical functions relations. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 271–298 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashby, M.F., Gibson, L.J., Wegst, U. & Olive, R. The mechanical properties of natural materials. I. Material property charts. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 450, 123–140 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon, J.E. & Jeronimidis, G. Composites with high work of fracture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 294, 545–550 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, L.B. et al. Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites. Nature 399, 761–763 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson, J.B. et al. Bone indentation recovery time correlates with bond reforming time. Nature 414, 773–776 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nalla, R.K., Kinney, J.H. & Ritchie, R.O. Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone. Nature Mater. 2, 164–168 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Niklas, K.J. Plant Biomechanics (Univ.Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meylan, B.A. & Butterfield, B.G. Helical orientation of the microfibrils in tracheids, fibres and vessels. Wood Sci. Technol. 12, 219–222 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cave, I.D. The anisotropic elasticity of the plant cell wall. Wood Sci. Technol. 2, 268–278 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jentzen, C.A. The effect of stress applied during drying on some of the properties of individual pulp fibers. TAPPI J. 47, 412–418 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Navi, P., Rastogi, P.K., Gresse, V. & Tolou, A. Micromechanics of wood subjected to axial tension. Wood Sci. Technol. 29, 411–419 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spatz, H.-CH., Köhler, L. & Niklas, K.J. Mechanical behaviour of plant tissues: Composite materials or structures? J. Exp. Biol. 202, 3269–3272 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Köhler, L. & Spatz, H.-C. Micromechanics of plant tissues beyond the linear-elastic range. Planta 215, 33–40 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lichtenegger, H., Reiterer, A., Stanzl-Tschegg, S.E. & Fratzl, P. in Microfibril Angle in Wood (ed. Butterfield, B.G.) 140–156 (IAWA, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schniewind, A.P. & Barrett, J.D. Cell wall model with complete shear restrain. Wood Fiber 1, 205–214 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Burgert, I., Keckes, J., Frühmann, K., Fratzl, P. & Tschegg, S.E. A comparison of two techniques for wood fibre isolation—evaluation by tensile tests on single fibres with different microfibril angle. Plant Biol. 4, 9–12 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hepworth, D.G. & Vincent, J.F.V. Modelling the mechanical properties of xylem tissue from tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum 'Samsun') by considering the importance of molecular and micromechanisms. Ann. Bot. 81, 761–770 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamamoto, H. & Kojima, Y. Properties of cell wall constituents in relation to longitudinal elasticity of wood. Part 1. Formation of the longitudinal elasticity of an isolated wood fiber. Wood Sci. Technol. 36, 55–74 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Burgert, I., Frühmann, K., Keckes, J., Fratzl, P. & Stanzl-Tschegg, S.E. Microtensile testing of wood fibers combined with video extensometry for efficient strain detection. Holzforschung (in the press).

  20. Fengel, D. & Wegener, G. Wood—Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions (De Gruyter, Berlin, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bergander, A. & Salmen, L. Cell wall properties and their effects on the mechanical properties of fibers. J. Mater. Sci. 37, 151–156 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H. Lichtenegger for discussions at early stages of this project. This work was supported by the Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (FWF-P14331).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keckes, J., Burgert, I., Frühmann, K. et al. Cell-wall recovery after irreversible deformation of wood. Nature Mater 2, 810–813 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1019

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1019

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing